Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Rep. Massie presses Garland on constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment

by June 5, 2024
June 5, 2024
Rep. Massie presses Garland on constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, R-Ky., pressed Attorney General Merrick on the constitutionality of appointing Jack Smith as special counsel in a hearing Tuesday. 

Garland testified before the House Judiciary Committee and was questioned by Massie on Smith’s appointment to oversee the classified documents and January 6 probe into former President Donald Trump. 

‘What gives you the authority to appoint a special counsel to create…you’ve created an office in the U.S. government that does not exist without authorization from Congress,’ Massie posed to Garland. 

Massie referenced amicus briefs in the cases brought by the DOJ against Trump filed by former Attorney General Ed Meese under Ronald Reagan – in which he argues that the case that Garland’s appointment of Smith — a private citizen — is in violation of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. 

‘Not clothed in the authority of the federal government, Smith is a modern example of the naked emperor,’ the brief states. 

‘Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos,’ they argued. 

Meese argues that the ‘illegality’ of Smith’s appointment is ‘sufficient to sink Smith’s petition, and the Court should deny review.’ 

Meese and company noted in the brief that Smith was appointed ‘to conduct the ongoing investigation into whether any person or entity [including former President Donald Trump] violated the law in connection with efforts to interfere with the lawful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote held on or about January 6, 2021.’

Garland responded to Massie that, ‘there are regulations under which the Attorney General appoint Special Counsel, they have been in effect for 30 years, maybe longer, under both parties. The matter that you’re talking about, about whether somebody can have an employee of the Justice Department serve as special counsel has been adjudicated,’ he said. 

Garland argued that special counsel appointments that he and other AGs, including Attorney General William Barr, have made cite a regulation that points to a statute. 

Meese, however, in his briefs filed in several points in the Trump cases, argued that ‘none of those statutes, nor any other statutory or constitutional provisions, remotely authorized the appointment by the Attorney General of a private citizen to receive extraordinary criminal law enforcement power under the title of Special Counsel.’

‘Second, even if one overlooks the absence of statutory authority for the position, there is no statute specifically authorizing the Attorney General, rather than the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint such a Special Counsel,’ the former AG wrote. 

Meese’s brief was even mentioned in a question by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Supreme Court oral arguments over Trump’s presidential immunity – which the high court is expected to decide this month.

‘It seems like you’ve created an office that would require an act of Congress, yet there’s not an act of Congress that authorizes that. And even if it didn’t require an act of Congress, and you’ve already admitted that there was no act of Congress that established this office, it would still require, according to the Constitution, a nomination by the President and confirmation by the Senate,’ Massie said to Garland. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Management team incentivisation and selling your business
next post
Iran-backed Houthis launch more missiles into Red Sea after Greece said attacks have declined

You may also like

‘Powerful tool’ for China: Government defends pending TikTok...

January 10, 2025

Wisconsin lawmakers propose ban on child sex dolls,...

May 23, 2023

Biden administration launches national strategy to combat Islamophobia,...

December 13, 2024

Trump vows to commute prison sentence of Silk...

May 26, 2024

McCarthy falls short in second House speaker vote...

January 3, 2023

North Carolina legislature begins with increased GOP majorities

January 11, 2023

Trump greets Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago, says World War...

July 26, 2024

Bipartisan resolution urges Biden admin to crack down...

December 21, 2023

Mystery flights from China to Iran raise questions...

June 19, 2025

Netanyahu dismisses claims of imminent cease-fire deal during...

September 5, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Right Supreme Court Call on Downsizing the US Department of Education

      July 14, 2025
    • From Hammer to Harami: Using StockCharts to Crack the Candlestick Code

      July 14, 2025
    • Jeremy Clarkson slams regulators as ‘most expensive’ Hawkstone beer advert is banned

      July 14, 2025
    • Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal

      July 14, 2025
    • ‘Held accountable’: Sen. Rand Paul again vows to issue a criminal referral for Fauci

      July 14, 2025
    • How the law shapes the reality for motorcyclists after serious injuries

      July 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,475)
    • Investing (2,121)
    • Politics (16,035)
    • Stocks (3,209)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved