Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Government Officials Should Not Try to Influence Social Media

by July 8, 2024
July 8, 2024
Government Officials Should Not Try to Influence Social Media

Jeffrey Miron and Jacob Winter

The Supreme Court recently threw out a case alleging that Biden administration officials unlawfully pressed social media companies to remove COVID-19-related disinformation. The court found that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, so it did not address the free speech or broader policy issues. Future cases with standing are likely, however, so it is important to consider the underlying questions.

Distressingly, many on the left and right want to regulate social media, claiming these outlets inappropriately promote or suppress certain viewpoints. Social media outlets inevitably make choices about whether, how much, and what to promote or suppress on their sites, and their decisions cannot possibly be neutral.

That, however, is the nature of free speech. The defense of the First Amendment is not that all speech is good, correct, or without harmful consequences. Instead, the defense is that controlling speech makes society worse by preventing discussion, expression of different viewpoints, and the vigorous debates that characterize a free society.

The opposing view holds that if content is false and harmful, it might be good overall to keep it offline. It is not possible, however, to restrict this power so that officials can pressure for the removal of only false or harmful content. 

In particular, many claims are difficult to prove. Granting officials power in deciding validity privileges those officials’ weighing of the evidence. Additionally, ceding evaluative power to the government promotes a culture where the public is not responsible for evaluating claims themselves. At worst, this would allow government officials to assert that false claims are true, or vice versa, with minimal resistance.

More broadly, it is difficult to know the harmfulness of content. For example, social media platforms moderate content about mental health, such as by suppressing pictures of self-harm. After viewing these images, however, youth have reported varied reactions — from wanting to imitate the harm to offering help and feeling a sense of belonging.

Thus, the antidote to false and harmful content is not government regulation; it is market forces that will provide a range of social media outlets for users to engage with each other. 

Social media outlets should therefore be free to choose their moderation policies and political biases — or eschew them — with no interference from the government.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Importance of Speed in PR: A Wake-Up Call for UK SMEs
next post
French parliament divided among far-left, center, far-right after elections

You may also like

Property Rights and Economic Progress

October 10, 2024

Capitalism—The Best System on (and for) Earth

April 22, 2024

Cato Files Suit Against HHS to Obtain Medicaid...

March 15, 2024

Milei’s Key Pending Task: Ending Argentina’s Currency Controls...

January 10, 2025

A US Attack on Iran Could Cause the...

June 18, 2025

Delaying Dollarization Can Put Milei’s Libertarian Agenda at...

January 19, 2024

CFPB Targets Currency Devaluations, Just Not Government-Caused Devaluations

June 3, 2024

SCOTUS Stumbles: EPA’s Power Plant Rule Is Inflicting...

October 24, 2024

Spending Cuts for 2025

November 19, 2024

Hayek, Peru, and The Road to Serfdom

October 9, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Britain’s fastest-growing firms revealed for 2025: Dfyne, Nala’s Baby and Hawkstone lead the charge

      June 29, 2025
    • Schumer to force Senate reading of Trump’s entire ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 28, 2025
    • Rubio condemns Iran’s ‘unacceptable’ threats against IAEA director

      June 28, 2025
    • Key blue state Republican says Senate’s local tax write-off offer is a ‘good deal’

      June 28, 2025
    • Key GOP senator defects on crucial vote, imperiling Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ in narrow majority

      June 28, 2025
    • Terror in Gaza: Hamas offers bounties to kill US and local aid workers, group says

      June 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,330)
    • Investing (2,081)
    • Politics (15,851)
    • Stocks (3,177)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved