Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Unions demand flexible working for civil servants

by July 29, 2024
July 29, 2024
Unions demand flexible working for civil servants

Labour must allow civil servants the flexibility to work from home by eliminating “arbitrary targets” requiring office attendance for a set number of days each week, union chiefs have asserted.

Union leaders are urging Sir Keir Starmer to overturn the previous government’s policy of mandating civil servants to be in the office for the majority of the week.

Fran Heathcote, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, stated, “Evidence shows productivity rises when employers consider the needs of workers. Setting arbitrary targets about office attendance does nothing to help productivity.”

The PCS is leading the charge against Britain’s official statistics body after it mandated staff to be in the office for two days a week.

Paul Nowak, of the Trades Union Congress (TUC), welcomed what he perceives as a change in attitude towards the civil service since Labour’s victory earlier this month. Recent civil service job adverts have indicated a requirement for office presence for just two days a week.

Nowak suggested that Labour “should follow the example of thousands of other employers and negotiate working arrangements with their staff and unions. Civil servants are more than capable of working flexibly and performing their duties effectively.”

Labour’s potential shift on working from home could be unexpected, particularly after Jonathan Ashworth, now chief executive of think tank Labour Together, stated that Labour would prefer civil servants to spend most of their time in the office.

Earlier this month, Ashworth deemed it “sensible” for civil servants to spend at least 60% of their week in the office, aligning with the previous Conservative stance.

Conservative ministers had attempted to dismantle the Tuesday-to-Thursday office culture in Whitehall due to concerns that remote working was harming public sector productivity. However, the PCS has resisted, arguing that workers should not be compelled to adhere to the new Office for National Statistics (ONS) rule of two days in the office per week.

Heathcote noted that some ONS workers accepted their roles because they had the option of full-time remote work.

A Labour insider mentioned that ministers are not prioritising “arguments about working arrangements or lanyards” and that previous arrangements remain unchanged. The publication of office occupancy data across civil service departments was paused during the pre-election period.

A government spokesman stated, “Our entire focus is on delivering change. We will support the civil service with the necessary tools to ensure it can deliver that for working people.”

Read more:
Unions demand flexible working for civil servants

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro wins re-election, as opposition disputes results
next post
Women in their 50s face looming pension crisis

You may also like

Rachel Reeves tells MPs Bank chief says ‘markets...

April 8, 2025

UK wellness start-up Zoe secures $15m investment to...

July 30, 2024

The importance of data privacy in the age...

May 2, 2023

M&S warns of possible price hikes as national...

November 7, 2024

Tightening SME lending rules ‘deeply irresponsible’: Business groups...

March 31, 2023

Facebook and Instagram to restrict advertisers’ access to...

January 11, 2023

What is the Purpose of Basic Life Support:...

October 27, 2023

European real estate appeal on the global market:...

August 30, 2024

INDONESIA’S FOREIGN MINISTRY IS BEING HIT FROM BOTH...

March 16, 2023

Soaring inflation forces Brits to tighten belts on...

June 23, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved