Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Grocery Price Gouging?

by August 19, 2024
August 19, 2024
Grocery Price Gouging?

Peter Van Doren

Soon-to-be Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris announced a proposal to empower the federal government to ban corporate price gouging in grocery prices. Historically, politicians often float price control proposals when prices of energy or housing increase. Groceries are a new addition to the list.

Earlier this year Cato published a book about price controls edited by my colleague Ryan Bourne. While it does not include a chapter on grocery price controls because of the lack of historical precedent, it does contain a chapter entitled “Greed and Corporate Concentration Have Not Caused Inflation.”

The good news, in this case, is that reaction to the grocery price control proposal in both the New York Times and the Washington Post included criticism of the proposal before anyone at Cato had blogged about it.

An economist quoted in the Times article said, “If prices are rising on average over time and profit margins expand, that might look like price gouging, but it’s actually indicative of a broad increase in demand. Such broad increases tend to be the result of expansionary monetary or fiscal policy—or both.”

The title of Catherine Rampell’s column in the Post is quite blunt: “When your opponent calls you ‘communist,’ maybe don’t propose price controls?” In the column she says, “It’s hard to exaggerate how bad this policy is.”

In my chapter in Ryan’s book, I concluded that the 1970s experience with energy price controls was so negative that congressional responses to constituent anger about energy prices in the last twenty years have consisted of calls for the FTC to investigate the usual suspects rather than actual price controls. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s current Senate proposal goes further. It would empower the FTC to investigate not just the usual suspects but ban any “grossly excessive price.”

The bad news is that Harris’s proposal suggests memories of the chaos created by 1970s oil and gas price controls may be fading. The good news is that the media have not forgotten.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Brazilian Judiciary’s Continued Censorship and the Brussels-Brasilia Effect
next post
Americans Paid for the Trump Tariffs—and Would Do So Again

You may also like

In Congress, a Move To Strip Courts of...

May 9, 2025

Justice Thomas’s Individualist Concurrence

June 30, 2023

Misinformation Is Not the Election Boogeyman

November 12, 2024

Considering Safe Banking for the Cannabis Industry

May 23, 2024

New Evidence Underscores the Value of Tobacco Harm...

July 16, 2025

Where Is Public Corruption the Highest?

July 15, 2025

Where Trump and Biden Stand on CBDCs

February 1, 2024

Trump Redeems Convicted Insurrectionists—Will It End There?

January 21, 2025

Dulles Airport Metro Extension Not Paying Off

November 1, 2023

Does the Earned-Income Tax Credit Reduce Caregiving for...

September 25, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Brushed with value: How fine art is becoming the tax-efficient investment of choice for the wealthy

      July 24, 2025
    • Trump foe Boasberg orders DOJ to detail status of CECOT migrants sent to Venezuela

      July 24, 2025
    • Hamas ‘hardens’ stance in ceasefire talks as Netanyahu recalls negotiation team

      July 24, 2025
    • White House sends mixed signals in Russia ‘hoax’ blame game

      July 24, 2025
    • Ex-Biden chief of staff giving ‘credible’ answers in House Oversight cover-up probe, lawmakers say

      July 24, 2025
    • Trump-foe Adam Schiff dismisses Tulsi Gabbard’s declassified Russia collusion intelligence as ‘dishonest’

      July 24, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,568)
    • Investing (2,145)
    • Politics (16,187)
    • Stocks (3,226)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved