Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Brazilian Judiciary’s Continued Censorship and the Brussels-Brasilia Effect

by August 19, 2024
August 19, 2024
The Brazilian Judiciary’s Continued Censorship and the Brussels-Brasilia Effect

David Inserra

This past weekend (Aug. 17–18), X announced it would close its local offices in Brazil in response to the judiciary’s continued censorial demands. This unprecedented action puts X at direct odds with Justice Alexandre de Moraes of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court and Superior Electoral Court, who demanded that X comply with his secret censorship orders or else he would jail X’s local staff.

This incident shows how increasing regulation and censorship abroad are negatively affecting Americans and US businesses.

The last time tensions flared between Moraes and X was in April when journalists revealed the vast judicial efforts to investigate, censor, and prosecute social media users for statements critical of the Brazilian government. Citing the need to defend democracy and stop misinformation, these orders were often secret and included high-profile speakers, such as sitting members of Brazil’s National Congress. Other reporting from across the political spectrum questioned Moraes’ arresting of individuals for the wrong political opinions, sometimes without trials. X argued that these orders were illegal under Brazil’s constitution and its Marco Civil da Internet, a law similar to the US’ Section 230 of the Communications Act, which provides platforms with civil liability protection from user-generated content.

At the time, Elon Musk had threatened to refuse to follow such orders but later acquiesced, seemingly recognizing that it would put X employees in danger. This is a position that some other tech companies find themselves in as well and most appear to be complying with such government orders.

But now X is prepared to stand its ground. Over the past few days, Moraes issued yet more secret orders—this time to censor popular accounts including another current member of Congress, and to turn over user data on not only Brazilians but also residents of Argentina and the United States. X refused to comply.

Given that such refusal has already put X at significant risk of growing fines and imprisonment of their personnel, it is possible that the decision to close the local office will lead to even more drastic government threats and penalties. Beyond censoring and jailing political dissidents, Moraes has previously suspended the encrypted communications app, Telegram, for its refusal to take down and turn over information on accounts belonging to Bolsonaro activists. Rumble stopped providing its services to Brazil at the end of 2023 in response to similar judicial orders, largely from Moraes. Trying to shut down X might not be much of a stretch for Moraes.

While only time will tell what comes next, the Brazilian government and judiciary’s increasingly common use of censorship to “protect democracy” is itself a threat to democracy. And its continued overreach may eventually push even more tech companies to decide that they, too, need to protect themselves from the Brazilian authorities.

Unfortunately, Brazil isn’t alone. Other democratic nations, including Canada, Australia, and especially the EU, are considering or have already passed internet speech regulations that are being used to threaten social media companies to comply with various censorial threats. Known as the “Brussels effect” because of the EU’s vast regulatory pressures on tech companies, such regulations not only suppress domestic speech in these countries but are increasingly impacting the speech and success of Americans and US companies.

Americans should be thankful that our First Amendment protects us from such blatant censorship, but we must not be complacent. We must affirm the importance of free expression, reject giving governments around the world the power to censor non-violent speech, and encourage our government to be more vocal in its defense of Americans and American companies facing censorial and abusive regulation abroad.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Prices and Price Controls: An Introduction
next post
Grocery Price Gouging?

You may also like

Rather Than Litigate Over Encampment Sweeps, San Francisco...

August 31, 2023

Possible Good News on Reform of Civil Forfeiture?

June 7, 2024

Australian Study on Opioid Prescribing is the Latest...

August 14, 2023

Welcome to Free Society

March 20, 2024

The Patchwork Strikes Back: State Data Privacy Laws...

July 6, 2023

Friday Feature: Path of Life Learning

March 1, 2024

The Untested Assumptions in SEC Chair Gensler’s Pivot...

July 31, 2023

Follow Up on Bank Secrecy Act Data

June 5, 2023

Maria Corina Machado Has United Venezuelans to Vote...

July 27, 2024

Terrorist Entry Through the Southwest Border

September 15, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • What’s Driving the Drop in Overdose Deaths?

      May 15, 2025
    • The real breakthrough in U.S.–China trade talks is much bigger than just tariffs

      May 15, 2025
    • Dem senator says ‘no doubt’ Biden declined cognitively during presidency

      May 15, 2025
    • Trump makes historic UAE visit as first US president in nearly 30 years

      May 15, 2025
    • GOP reps, advocacy group to target competitive House districts in Trump tax-cut push

      May 15, 2025
    • Biden’s pandemic playbook failed. Trump just offered a smarter path forward

      May 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (7,966)
    • Investing (1,960)
    • Politics (15,230)
    • Stocks (3,084)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved