Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Mississippi State Auditor’s Report “How Illegal Immigration Hurts Mississippi Taxpayers” Isn’t Serious

by August 22, 2024
August 22, 2024
The Mississippi State Auditor’s Report “How Illegal Immigration Hurts Mississippi Taxpayers” Isn’t Serious

Alex Nowrasteh

The Mississippi Office of the State Auditor released a report that purports to show that illegal immigrants impose a cost of over $100 million on state taxpayers and that “actual spending could be higher.” Unfortunately, the report is not a high-quality estimate and is practically worthless because it doesn’t even attempt to include the tax revenue collected from illegal immigrants in the state. The report poorly estimates outlays for illegal immigrants and entirely ignores tax revenue, so a negative answer is the only methodologically possible answer.

The report, which is six pages long, isn’t even useful when it comes to estimating the costs by themselves. It uses back-of-the-envelope estimates for the number of students who are illegal immigrants and emergency room visits by illegal immigrants. Oddly, the auditor didn’t use state administrative data to more accurately identify illegal immigrants who consume taxpayer-funded health care and other services. Instead, the auditor looked at macro data and merely made assumptions—for instance, that half of illegal immigrants go to the emergency room once a year. The Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System FY 2023 report shows that emergency services for illegal immigrants amounted to a total of $0 in Mississippi. The state auditor should have started there, at least.

Upon opening the report, there were two initial signs that the state auditor’s report was not a careful study. The first was its heavy reliance on a state-level fiscal cost estimate by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) that overcounted costs and underestimated tax revenue to such an extent that it’s hopelessly flawed, detailed above.

The second sign is that the opening paragraph unintentionally argues that the illegal immigrant share of the population halved from 2016 to 2022—which did not happen. They wrote:

Illegal Immigration [sic] is a challenge all 50 states face. According to experts from Yale and MIT, 22.1 million illegal immigrants lived in the United States in 2016. Experts acknowledge the number of illegal immigrants in the United States is expected to grow when 2023 and 2024 data becomes available. As of 2022, researchers estimate that illegal immigrants make up 3.3% of the nation’s population.

An illegal immigrant population of 22.1 million in 2016 would have been equal to just over 6.8 percent of the US population at that time. But the auditor then wrote that the population of illegal immigrants was just 3.3 percent of the US population in 2022. What happened? The auditor took two illegal immigrant population estimates from two different sources, one of them a numerical estimate and the other a share of the population, and used them interchangeably. The numerical estimate that comprises 3.3 percent of the population is 11 million. That’s a sloppy mistake.

What about the estimated population of 22.1 million illegal immigrants in 2016? This substantially overstates the illegal immigrant population in that year. Don’t believe me? Perhaps you should read the piece “New Estimate of 22 Million Illegal Immigrants Is Not Plausible” by Steven A. Camarota from the immigration-restrictionist Center for Immigration Studies.

Most troubling, the Mississippi Office of the State Auditor produced a much better state-level illegal immigrant fiscal cost estimate in 2006. There are a few oddities in that report, such as counting the lost tax revenue from remittances as a cost, but it tries to include the tax revenue paid by illegal immigrants, whereas the most recent auditor’s report doesn’t. The state auditor could have dusted off their old paper, updated the data, and published a much more defensible estimate. Instead, they published a report that is even less defensible than the report produced by FAIR. Despite all its flaws, at least FAIR tried to estimate tax revenue paid by illegal immigrants. The Mississippi Auditor didn’t even try. Shockingly, the FAIR report above is more methodologically sound than the Mississippi auditor’s attempt in 2024 to estimate the fiscal costs of illegal immigration in Mississippi.

State auditors should attempt to produce better fiscal cost estimates of illegal immigration if they’re going to go down this path. Mississippi state auditors have tried it before, and they can do it again. Failing to publish fiscal cost estimates is better than publishing unserious reports like Mississippi’s most recent effort. Who audits the auditors? Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Why this former Republican presidential candidate is at the Democrats’ 2024 convention
next post
RFK Jr’s running mate says Democrats are ‘terrified’ their campaign may join forces with Trump

You may also like

When the State Kills, Medical Ethics Don’t Matter

February 12, 2025

Friday Feature: Buffalo Christian Homeschool Academy

April 25, 2025

Repealing Only Two Biden-Era Tax Credits Could Cement...

March 27, 2025

Friday Feature: Institute for Catholic Liberal Education

July 21, 2023

Jimmy Lai: Prisoner of the State

May 30, 2023

A Case for Deficit Reduction

April 19, 2024

Border Patrol Agent Deaths in the Line of...

January 8, 2024

More Costly Steel Tariffs on the Horizon

February 11, 2025

Top Tax Rates Are Already on Wrong Side...

April 24, 2024

Joint Economic Committee Report Sounds the Alarm on...

March 25, 2025

When the State Kills, Medical Ethics Don’t Matter

February 12, 2025

Friday Feature: Buffalo Christian Homeschool Academy

April 25, 2025

Repealing Only Two Biden-Era Tax Credits Could Cement...

March 27, 2025

Friday Feature: Institute for Catholic Liberal Education

July 21, 2023

Jimmy Lai: Prisoner of the State

May 30, 2023

A Case for Deficit Reduction

April 19, 2024

Border Patrol Agent Deaths in the Line of...

January 8, 2024

More Costly Steel Tariffs on the Horizon

February 11, 2025

Top Tax Rates Are Already on Wrong Side...

April 24, 2024

Joint Economic Committee Report Sounds the Alarm on...

March 25, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Right Supreme Court Call on Downsizing the US Department of Education

      July 14, 2025
    • From Hammer to Harami: Using StockCharts to Crack the Candlestick Code

      July 14, 2025
    • Jeremy Clarkson slams regulators as ‘most expensive’ Hawkstone beer advert is banned

      July 14, 2025
    • Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal

      July 14, 2025
    • ‘Held accountable’: Sen. Rand Paul again vows to issue a criminal referral for Fauci

      July 14, 2025
    • How the law shapes the reality for motorcyclists after serious injuries

      July 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,475)
    • Investing (2,121)
    • Politics (16,035)
    • Stocks (3,209)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved