Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

United States v. Duarte Brief: Universal, Lifetime Disarmament of Felons Is Unconstitutional

by September 24, 2024
September 24, 2024
United States v. Duarte Brief: Universal, Lifetime Disarmament of Felons Is Unconstitutional

Matthew Cavedon

In 2020, petitioner Steven Duarte was charged with the federal offense of possessing a firearm while a convicted felon; he had no violent crimes on his record. He was convicted after a trial and sentenced to be imprisoned for 51 months.

On appeal, a panel of the Ninth Circuit reversed Duarte’s conviction under the Second Amendment, holding that the government failed to show that permanently depriving Duarte of his fundamental rights is consistent with our nation’s history. However, at the government’s request, the Ninth Circuit vacated the panel’s decision and agreed to rehear the case en banc.

Cato joined an amicus brief filed by federal public and community defender offices asking the en banc court to hold that universal, lifetime disarmament of all people convicted of felonies is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court’s history-based test allows for only narrow, concrete, historically grounded exceptions to the Second Amendment.

Additionally, disarming all felony probationers reflects a judgment that all felonies are dangerous. That premise is belied by an aggressive, decades-long trend in American politics: overcriminalization. 

Overcriminalization bears out a commonly held fear about the government’s bid for extreme deference: that instead of tethering the Second Amendment to the dangers motivating our regulatory traditions, the government would give legislatures unreviewable power to manipulate the Second Amendment by choosing a label.

Exceptions to individual rights do not move with the political winds. When it comes to individual rights, history—not legislatures—determines the existence and scope of exceptions. This means that courts may not simply assume that the Second Amendment will expand or contract to fit any crime labeled a felony. Rather, courts must confront the reality of what modern felonies look like, and compare that reality to the government’s proposed historical analogues. 

Applying history’s lessons to today’s sprawling criminal codes, the court should conclude that the government has not met its burden to square universal felon disarmament with our regulatory traditions.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
No CBDC, Says Canadian, Australian, and Colombian Central Banks
next post
Cooper v. United States Brief: Terry Frisks Are Unconstitutional

You may also like

Is Argentina’s Sale of Puts on Treasury Bonds...

July 9, 2024

The Government Can’t Evade Lawsuits by Strategically Mooting...

January 8, 2024

10 Reasons to Cut Corporate Welfare

March 6, 2025

A Better Approach to U.S.-China Trade

May 9, 2023

White House and DOJ Keep CBDC Legislation Secret,...

November 14, 2024

Luna Introduces PATRIOT Act Repeal Bill

May 9, 2025

Another Fiscal Commission Model? The Greenspan Commission Was...

November 9, 2023

The Wrong Door: Federal Agents Raid the Wrong...

March 21, 2025

New Paper: Only 3 Percent of Green Card...

February 15, 2024

How Special Interests Keep Bad Laws on the...

August 4, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Bill Gates met with Trump to talk ‘importance of US global health programs and health research’: spox

      August 28, 2025
    • Trump asks SCOTUS to uphold freeze on billions in USAID payments

      August 27, 2025
    • Three Years of Sounding the Debt Alarm at Cato and on the Debt Dispatch

      August 27, 2025
    • Trump Administration Rightly Attacks EU Tech Regulations but Tariffs and Censorship at Home Harm Americans 

      August 27, 2025
    • White House demands all Gaza hostages return home ‘this week’ amid stalled talks

      August 27, 2025
    • Bankruptcy, Hell, and Exit Barriers

      August 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,897)
    • Investing (2,246)
    • Politics (16,502)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved