Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

United States v. Duarte Brief: Universal, Lifetime Disarmament of Felons Is Unconstitutional

by September 24, 2024
September 24, 2024
United States v. Duarte Brief: Universal, Lifetime Disarmament of Felons Is Unconstitutional

Matthew Cavedon

In 2020, petitioner Steven Duarte was charged with the federal offense of possessing a firearm while a convicted felon; he had no violent crimes on his record. He was convicted after a trial and sentenced to be imprisoned for 51 months.

On appeal, a panel of the Ninth Circuit reversed Duarte’s conviction under the Second Amendment, holding that the government failed to show that permanently depriving Duarte of his fundamental rights is consistent with our nation’s history. However, at the government’s request, the Ninth Circuit vacated the panel’s decision and agreed to rehear the case en banc.

Cato joined an amicus brief filed by federal public and community defender offices asking the en banc court to hold that universal, lifetime disarmament of all people convicted of felonies is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court’s history-based test allows for only narrow, concrete, historically grounded exceptions to the Second Amendment.

Additionally, disarming all felony probationers reflects a judgment that all felonies are dangerous. That premise is belied by an aggressive, decades-long trend in American politics: overcriminalization. 

Overcriminalization bears out a commonly held fear about the government’s bid for extreme deference: that instead of tethering the Second Amendment to the dangers motivating our regulatory traditions, the government would give legislatures unreviewable power to manipulate the Second Amendment by choosing a label.

Exceptions to individual rights do not move with the political winds. When it comes to individual rights, history—not legislatures—determines the existence and scope of exceptions. This means that courts may not simply assume that the Second Amendment will expand or contract to fit any crime labeled a felony. Rather, courts must confront the reality of what modern felonies look like, and compare that reality to the government’s proposed historical analogues. 

Applying history’s lessons to today’s sprawling criminal codes, the court should conclude that the government has not met its burden to square universal felon disarmament with our regulatory traditions.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
No CBDC, Says Canadian, Australian, and Colombian Central Banks
next post
Cooper v. United States Brief: Terry Frisks Are Unconstitutional

You may also like

The Equal Rights Amendment Isn’t Part of the...

December 18, 2024

Friday Feature: The Grove Christian Co-Op

April 26, 2024

The Political Economy of EPA’s Updated Social Cost...

February 28, 2024

Kamala Harris and the PRO Act: A Bad...

November 4, 2024

Two Great First Amendment Decisions by Judge Willett...

January 22, 2024

Modern Libertarianism Author: “It’s the Ideas’ Victories That...

March 14, 2025

Plan for Immigrant Spouses of US Citizens Faces...

June 18, 2024

FDIC Vice Chairman Travis Hill to Visit Cato...

September 18, 2023

Fast Facts about Discretionary Spending

May 30, 2023

North Carolina Legislature Cracks Down on Delinquent Local...

June 23, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Marco Rubio holds first meeting with families of hostages held by Hamas

      June 28, 2025
    • Trump’s NATO Turnaround: From threatening to pull US out to ‘daddy’ of the alliance

      June 28, 2025
    • Week Ahead: As NIFTY Breaks Out, Change Of Leadership Likely To Keep The Index Moving

      June 28, 2025
    • Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces Republican family feud as Senate reveals its final text

      June 28, 2025
    • Senate shuts down Kaine’s attempt to check Trump’s war powers

      June 28, 2025
    • 3 Stock Setups for the Second Half of 2025

      June 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,081)
    • Politics (15,845)
    • Stocks (3,177)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved