Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Trump’s Tariff Threats a Reminder of the Need to Curb Presidential Power

by September 25, 2024
September 25, 2024
Trump’s Tariff Threats a Reminder of the Need to Curb Presidential Power

Tad DeHaven

On September 24, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump told a crowd in Georgia that “tariff” is “one of the most beautiful words I’ve ever heard.” The former president’s affection for taxing goods Americans import is well established. But it seems that as we’ve moved closer to election day, his tariff zeal has intensified. Last week, he said he would use tariffs to lower food prices, a suggestion my colleagues Scott Lincicome and Sophia Bagley have labeled “deranged.” 

On the twenty-fourth, he threatened a 200 percent tariff on John Deere tractor imports because the company had previously announced plans to shift some production from Iowa to Mexico. This apparently was an off-the-cuff proposal, prompted by the sight of a John Deere tractor behind him at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. He also repeated a threat to automakers that, “We’re going to put big tariffs on those cars that are coming here [from Mexico] at 100 to 200 percent, and they’re no longer going to be competitive … so you better stay in Michigan.” 

Scott’s recent post, “Tariff Myths, Debunked,” is a handy takedown of the protectionist justifications for Trump’s tariff fetish, and Pierre Lemieux further breaks down the economics of tariffs in a new Regulation article, including explaining why the prices of domestic-made goods rise when tariffs are applied. I won’t rehash those arguments here. Instead, I want to say it’s long overdue for Congress to reclaim its constitutional responsibility to “regulate commerce with foreign nations.” 

At Monday’s event in Pennsylvania, Trump asserted to a reporter that he could unilaterally impose widespread tariffs without congressional approval. After initially responding blithely that Congress will approve his tariffs, he said, “I don’t need Congress, but they will approve it … I’ll have the right to impose them myself if they don’t.” 

Trump’s confidence in his presumed omnipotence stems from his administration’s abuse of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to restrict imports on national security grounds. As a thorough analysis by Scott and Inu Manak explains in detail, this justification is dubious and Trump’s use of it during his 2017–2020 presidency to threaten US allies was decidedly abuse. 

There was bipartisan support in the Senate to rein in executive branch overstep on trade policy during Trump’s time in office but, unfortunately, nothing came of it. Maybe that will now change. Last week, Sen. Rand Paul (R‑KY) introduced his No Taxation Without Representation Act on, fittingly, Constitution Day. The bill is relatively simple: The president could only impose a tariff if Congress receives a proposal from the White House explaining the rationale for it, which Congress would then have to approve. It would apply to the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and would not affect US embargoes. 

From Paul’s press release:

The No Taxation Without Representation Act seeks to curb the President’s ability to tax Americans by implementing tariffs without Congressional approval. The bill strengthens our system of checks and balances by requiring Congressional consent for any tariffs that significantly impact American businesses and consumers. By restoring the role of Congress in the taxation process, the bill ensures greater accountability, transparency, and long-term economic stability.

Regardless of whether one supports or opposes tariffs generally, our system of government calls explicitly for balance between the branches. With the two candidates for president taking turns sounding like an authoritarian Santa Claus, Trump’s mounting threats to punish American companies with a wave of his wand exemplifies the need to rein in executive overreach.
 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Dems eye possible Trump investigations if they win House majority
next post
Johnson demands Zelenskyy fire Ukraine’s ambassador to US amid fallout from Pennsylvania trip

You may also like

Catastrophic Enrollment Declines at Some Community Colleges

May 1, 2023

Overdose Prevention Centers Are Saving Lives—So Why Is...

February 19, 2025

AI Isolationism’s Risks: The Unintended Consequences of Banning...

March 21, 2025

Is Our Credit Card System Broken?

March 19, 2024

Concerned About Learning Loss? Let Funding Follow Students

December 11, 2023

The Misguided Antitrust Investigations in AI

September 13, 2024

Libertarians and DOGE Anxiety Disorder

March 28, 2025

OECD International Tax Hearing Wrap‐​Up

July 24, 2023

In Minneapolis, Planners Mix Basic Income and Rent...

November 8, 2024

Food Freedom Is Personal Freedom—A Personal Crusade Should...

April 22, 2025

Catastrophic Enrollment Declines at Some Community Colleges

May 1, 2023

Overdose Prevention Centers Are Saving Lives—So Why Is...

February 19, 2025

AI Isolationism’s Risks: The Unintended Consequences of Banning...

March 21, 2025

Is Our Credit Card System Broken?

March 19, 2024

Concerned About Learning Loss? Let Funding Follow Students

December 11, 2023

The Misguided Antitrust Investigations in AI

September 13, 2024

Libertarians and DOGE Anxiety Disorder

March 28, 2025

OECD International Tax Hearing Wrap‐​Up

July 24, 2023

In Minneapolis, Planners Mix Basic Income and Rent...

November 8, 2024

Food Freedom Is Personal Freedom—A Personal Crusade Should...

April 22, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump defends embattled AG Pam Bondi, says ‘nobody cares about’ Jeffrey Epstein

      July 12, 2025
    • Bondi says all charges against doctor who allegedly destroyed COVID vaccines have been dropped

      July 12, 2025
    • Meet ‘China’s man in Lima’ who jetted over to US to collect trains donated by Biden admin

      July 12, 2025
    • Inside Dan Bongino’s tense meeting with White House officials over Jeffrey Epstein fallout

      July 12, 2025
    • Could Butler happen again? Former Secret Service agents weigh in on political violence in 2025

      July 12, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Trump is flunking his MAGA base’s Jeffrey Epstein test

      July 12, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,456)
    • Investing (2,118)
    • Politics (16,017)
    • Stocks (3,205)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved