Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

Could everything you have been told about Britain’s low productivity be wrong?

by October 5, 2024
October 5, 2024
Could everything you have been told about Britain’s low productivity be wrong?

If you’ve been paying any attention to the news in recent years you will know that Britain has a productivity ‘problem’.

August publications such as the Financial Times, and The Economist will tell you Britain’s ‘poor productivity’ is ‘holding us back’ as a country on the world stage.

Institutions from the London School of Economics, Economics Observatory and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research put it down to a ‘lack of investment’.

And if you look at the latest Office for National Statistics figures you can see it in black and white.

For every hour we work in the UK we make £46.92, while in the US they make £58.88, Germany makes £55.83 and France makes £55.50. If only we could work harder and more efficiently they bemoan.

But what if we look at those same statistics as a customer. Suddenly the UK looks the best value. All things being equal customers can buy an hour of work in the UK for the less than in some of our G7 neighbours.

When customers are global suddenly that ‘poor productivity’ is not a disadvantage its an advantage. The UK looks cheap.

Now some might argue that I am simplifying too much; economists also use a second measure of productivity and that is Gross Value Added (GVA). Simply put, it’s the difference between a raw product and the output after a worker has turned it into something.

This measure works really well in manufacturing. You just take the end price of a car, minus the cost of the raw materials in making that car and then divide the remainder by the hours worked. If the factory becomes more productive and they produce cars in less time then productivity is up.

But here’s the problem with using that measure in the UK. Our economy is 81 per cent services! Our service sector is an unusually high proportion of our economy. In France it is 70% and in Germany 62%.

Now the thing about services is the human hours generally is the product. And the price people can charge for those hours flexes according to the market.

If the raw materials of a car goes up, the overall price of all cars will go up so companies can make a profit.

But in the service sector, companies can cut back much further if the economy is doing badly because the hours are the only thing they are really selling.

So you can see what I am talking about let’s look at an example.

I run a professional services firm. One of the things my firm provides for its clients is PR services. Broken down in very simple terms we might say to a client that we can generate four high quality pieces of coverage for £X per month. And for simplicity I calculate that it is going to take my team 50 hours of work per month to achieve that.

Now this client is a global client and also needs to achieve the same in the US. Their agency takes the same amount of time and achieves the same result but charges twice as much.

According to the economist which company is more productive? That’s right, if you’ve been following you will know that the US agency has charged twice as much for its time even though the output for the end consumer was the same.

I’m no economist but I do understand value and I know that all things being equal something half as much is better value.

But it’s not just me spotting it, our customers do to. Despite my company being an agency of just 15 people, around a third of our customers are headquartered abroad. We don’t market ourselves outside the UK – they just know they get better bang for buck.

That’s also why after seven years in the UK we are looking to expand into North America. We already have interest in us setting up an office in Toronto.

I will be taking an exploratory trip out next month. And guess what, I’ll be taking two of my ‘unproductive’ British workers with me.

Read more:
Could everything you have been told about Britain’s low productivity be wrong?

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump says Israel should hit Iran’s nuclear facilities, slamming Biden’s response
next post
Week Ahead: Putting Market Moves In Perspective; Watch Nifty From This Angle

You may also like

Different Ways To Maximise The Limited Space In...

November 2, 2023

MPs calling for tax cuts show ‘questionable judgement’,...

August 24, 2023

One in ten businesses lose staff over office...

August 6, 2025

Ticked off: Beyoncé and Ronaldo among those to...

April 21, 2023

Data Collection: Empowering Businesses with Insights

April 4, 2024

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak hopes EU will waive...

May 18, 2023

Adrian Chiles Faces £1.7m Tax Bill After Losing...

June 11, 2024

Secrets of Success: Paul Seabridge, CEO of Opulentia...

January 16, 2024

Investigating the Tactics Used by De Hek and...

December 23, 2022

Former environment secretary urges successor not to drop...

October 4, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Bill Barr, former Trump attorney general, to face House investigators in Epstein probe

      August 18, 2025
    • Back from Alaska, Trump starts week with crucial foreign policy talks over Ukraine war

      August 18, 2025
    • Trump blasts ‘lightweight’ Dem senator who criticized Putin summit in Alaska: ‘Stupid’

      August 18, 2025
    • Zelenskyy heads into crucial Trump meeting as US weighs security guarantees for Kyiv

      August 18, 2025
    • Are you better off since Donald Trump took office?

      August 18, 2025
    • Tesla slashes UK leasing costs as sales slump against Chinese rivals

      August 18, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,811)
    • Investing (2,217)
    • Politics (16,408)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved