Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Right Corporate Tax Rate is 0 Percent

by October 25, 2024
October 25, 2024
The Right Corporate Tax Rate is 0 Percent

Jeffrey Miron

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the tax rate on corporate income from 35% to 21%. Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris wants to raise the rate to 28%, arguing it would be “fairer” and help fund public services. In contrast, Republican candidate Donald Trump, who signed the 2017 Act, now advocates for a 15% corporate tax rate for US-based manufacturers, calling it “the centerpiece of his plan for a manufacturing renaissance.”

Both approaches are way off: the right corporate tax rate is 0%.

Beyond lowering the return to capital and thus reducing economic growth, taxing corporate income has three negatives.

First, taxing corporate income perpetuates the idea that something other than people can pay taxes. False. If you can’t shake hands with it, it doesn’t pay taxes. Corporations send checks to the IRS, but the economic burden of these payments falls on consumers (via higher prices), employees (via lower wages), and shareholders (via lower after-tax profits). Believing otherwise implies—incorrectly—that governments can fund their activities by making corporations pay their fair share, rather than by taxing people.

Second, taxing corporate income makes it harder for investors to understand corporate accounts, since corporations subject to taxation take actions that lower their taxable income even when not economically sensible.

Third, taxing corporate income leads governments to distinguish between for-profit (taxable) and non-profit (non-taxable) entities. This allows politicization of such designations and forces governments to make inherently controversial decisions about which activities and organizations are charitable, educational, religious, and so on.

The standard argument in favor of taxing corporate income—soaking the rich—is weak at best. Although existing evidence suggests that corporate taxation falls disproportionately on higher-income taxpayers, it harms lower-income taxpayers in many cases, including by lowering wages. A more targeted approach is progressive rates in the personal income tax system, possibly combined with a social safety net like universal basic income.

An ideal tax system distorts economic decisions as little as possible and avoids incentivizing evasion, avoidance, confusion, and politicization. A 0% corporate tax rate does just that.

This article appeared on Substack on October 25, 2024. Apex Poudel, a student at Motherland Secondary School in Pokhara, Nepal, assisted in the preparation of this post. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The US Is Not The Only Stock Market In The World
next post
Why the S&P 500 Won’t Break 6000 (Yet)

You may also like

California Implications of Britain’s Plan to Truncate its...

October 6, 2023

We Are Still Measuring Inflation All Wrong

February 26, 2024

FISA Legislative ‘Reform’: Secret House Session Edition

February 12, 2024

Friday Feature: Homeschool Connections Educational Services

April 12, 2024

Election Policy Roundup

April 1, 2025

Bay Area Transit Agency Experiment with “Low Cost”...

December 18, 2023

A New Heritage “Backgrounder” Addresses the Mix of...

May 14, 2024

Tariffs on Imports from China Are Still Too...

May 23, 2025

Rep. Miller‐​Meeks’ OTC Act Might Nudge the FDA...

July 14, 2023

Petty Grievances, Erosion of the Rule of Law...

March 12, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Frasers Group secures potential £3.5bn war chest to fund growth and acquisitions

      July 3, 2025
    • Roomix raises £850k to expand family-focused custom furniture platform

      July 3, 2025
    • House advances Trump’s massive agenda bill after fiscal hawks cave

      July 3, 2025
    • Technological Innovation: How are Greece and the UK Leading the Way?

      July 3, 2025
    • Trump turns to Supreme Court in fight to oust Biden-era consumer safety officials

      July 3, 2025
    • Bush teams up with notorious Trump foes to trash ‘colossal mistake’ shuttering USAID

      July 2, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,368)
    • Investing (2,094)
    • Politics (15,922)
    • Stocks (3,187)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved