Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Right Corporate Tax Rate is 0 Percent

by October 25, 2024
October 25, 2024
The Right Corporate Tax Rate is 0 Percent

Jeffrey Miron

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reduced the tax rate on corporate income from 35% to 21%. Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris wants to raise the rate to 28%, arguing it would be “fairer” and help fund public services. In contrast, Republican candidate Donald Trump, who signed the 2017 Act, now advocates for a 15% corporate tax rate for US-based manufacturers, calling it “the centerpiece of his plan for a manufacturing renaissance.”

Both approaches are way off: the right corporate tax rate is 0%.

Beyond lowering the return to capital and thus reducing economic growth, taxing corporate income has three negatives.

First, taxing corporate income perpetuates the idea that something other than people can pay taxes. False. If you can’t shake hands with it, it doesn’t pay taxes. Corporations send checks to the IRS, but the economic burden of these payments falls on consumers (via higher prices), employees (via lower wages), and shareholders (via lower after-tax profits). Believing otherwise implies—incorrectly—that governments can fund their activities by making corporations pay their fair share, rather than by taxing people.

Second, taxing corporate income makes it harder for investors to understand corporate accounts, since corporations subject to taxation take actions that lower their taxable income even when not economically sensible.

Third, taxing corporate income leads governments to distinguish between for-profit (taxable) and non-profit (non-taxable) entities. This allows politicization of such designations and forces governments to make inherently controversial decisions about which activities and organizations are charitable, educational, religious, and so on.

The standard argument in favor of taxing corporate income—soaking the rich—is weak at best. Although existing evidence suggests that corporate taxation falls disproportionately on higher-income taxpayers, it harms lower-income taxpayers in many cases, including by lowering wages. A more targeted approach is progressive rates in the personal income tax system, possibly combined with a social safety net like universal basic income.

An ideal tax system distorts economic decisions as little as possible and avoids incentivizing evasion, avoidance, confusion, and politicization. A 0% corporate tax rate does just that.

This article appeared on Substack on October 25, 2024. Apex Poudel, a student at Motherland Secondary School in Pokhara, Nepal, assisted in the preparation of this post. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The US Is Not The Only Stock Market In The World
next post
Why the S&P 500 Won’t Break 6000 (Yet)

You may also like

Representative Mooney Calls Out Fed’s CBDC Pilots

May 26, 2023

The Fed Must Adopt a Monetary Policy Rule

January 14, 2025

The “Zombification” of Qualified Immunity?

May 15, 2024

New HIV Prevention Drug Approved—Now Let’s Remove the...

June 19, 2025

The US Food Trade Deficit Is Nothing to...

April 15, 2025

Congress Should Reverse its $196 Billion Social Security...

February 10, 2025

Words to Fear: I’m From the State Government,...

June 10, 2024

The Incoherence of the White House’s Anti- “Junk...

March 11, 2024

Where Is Public Corruption the Highest?

July 15, 2025

New Data Show Migrants Were More Likely to...

November 2, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • American history won’t be displayed ‘in a woke manner’ at Smithsonian, Trump says

      August 15, 2025
    • Please Stop Calling them “Reciprocal” Tariffs

      August 14, 2025
    • Energy Department Not Interested In Government Transparency

      August 14, 2025
    • A Bet on X, a Bottle of Scotch, and Why the IRA Was Bound to Break

      August 14, 2025
    • ICE Could Prevent Some of the Coming Corruption, Criminal, and Misconduct Scandals That Will Plague the Agency

      August 14, 2025
    • Anti-Profiling Court Order Cuts LA ICE Arrests by 66 Percent

      August 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,782)
    • Investing (2,213)
    • Politics (16,389)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved