Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Treasury Advisory Committee Calls for CBDCs to Replace Stablecoins

by November 4, 2024
November 4, 2024
Treasury Advisory Committee Calls for CBDCs to Replace Stablecoins

Nicholas Anthony

The Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee has published a new presentation calling for central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to replace stablecoins. Pointing to a history of so-called “wildcat banking,” the committee argued that just as the government monopolized the issuance of paper currency by establishing the Federal Reserve, the government should monopolize digital currency by establishing a CBDC:

In a similar manner to how privately-issued “wildcat” currencies were replaced by government-backed central currencies in the late-1800s, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) will likely need to replace stablecoins as the primary form of digital currency underpinning tokenized transactions.

This statement has several problems, but let’s consider just three.

The first problem is the implication that the history of banking in the United States was a history of wildcat banking. The idea that banks were defrauding customers and disappearing with their money is certainly a concerning one. And it did happen at times. However, such wildcats were far from the norm. 

While it is difficult to put an exact number on the issue, George Selgin, director emeritus of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives, estimates that the total number of wildcats was “no higher than 173.” In contrast, he estimates there were around 2,450 banks in total during this time. 

Second, while many people like to suggest wildcats were the source of failures during this period, the bigger problem was that the laws governing banks had undermined financial stability. Again, as Selgin explains, “free banking” laws during this period,

forced banks to invest in … very risky securities—and especially in risky state government bonds—while the rule against branching limited their ability to diversify around this risk…. It was owing to these restrictive components of U.S.-style free banking that scads of American free banks ended up going bust.

Third, it does not follow that because the government took over one area of money, it should take over another. What the experience in the 1800s showed was that the government has a unique power over others. Competitors in the private sector must strive to offer a better product. The government, however, can undermine others through laws and regulations that make it nearly impossible for the private sector to function. For a modern example, one need only look to the government’s hostility towards stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies.

With these problems in mind (and many still on the table), it’s unfortunate that the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee found the wildcat argument persuasive. Yet the committee is not alone. This argument has been used by the likes of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D‑MA), Securities and Exchange Commissioner Gary Gensler, then-Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, European Central Bank board member Fabio Panetta, and countless others in the pursuit of expanding the state.

The real lesson from the “wildcat story” is that policymakers must be held accountable. They should not be allowed to undermine an entire industry and they should not be allowed to swoop in to monopolize it when it eventually fails. That was true in the past and it’s true today. The difference comes down to whether Americans let it happen again. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Equities Hang on to Weaker “Go” Trend as Communications Offers a Helping Hand
next post
Deregulation, Not Rent Control, Is the Right Response to the Housing Crisis

You may also like

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But...

May 22, 2025

When It Comes to Cash Policies, Actions Speak...

April 5, 2024

Immigration is Good, Just Like Trade

May 27, 2025

Biden Administration Again Delays Decision on Banning Menthol...

April 29, 2024

Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

January 31, 2025

The Eighth Circuit Should Block SEC’s Illegal Climate...

June 25, 2024

Friday Feature: Tapestry Academy and Microschool Florida

July 14, 2023

Bank Secrecy Act and Capital Gains Targeted for...

June 30, 2025

From Nutrition to Nannying: Texas SB 25 and...

June 4, 2025

New Defending Globalization Essay Just in Time for...

November 26, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 9, 2025
    • Former Dragons’ Den star Julie Meyer stripped of MBE after court contempt ruling

      August 9, 2025
    • Gambling firms lose £4bn in market value amid fears of Reeves-led tax hike

      August 9, 2025
    • Soho House profits surge as membership limits boost exclusivity amid privatisation talks

      August 9, 2025
    • HSBC reverses Canary Wharf exit plan amid desk shortage and return-to-office push

      August 9, 2025
    • WATCH: GOP senators divided over whether Epstein documents are a distraction or a needed reckoning

      August 8, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,721)
    • Investing (2,191)
    • Politics (16,344)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved