Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Trump and Vance Have Room to Run on Ukraine, and on Europe

by November 6, 2024
November 6, 2024
Trump and Vance Have Room to Run on Ukraine, and on Europe

Justin Logan

The Washington foreign-policy establishment, working in concert with the Europeans, has been trying for years to “Trump-proof” both endless US aid to Ukraine and endless US dominance of Europe.

The new Trump administration can blow through most of these efforts if it chooses. And it should.

To much fanfare a few months ago, the effort to distribute military aid to Ukraine was moved from the US aegis to the NATO one. This was widely viewed as an effort to “Trump-proof” military aid to Ukraine, but it was never quite clear how it would Trump-proof the aid. The bulk of the military aid that has been instrumental to Ukraine’s survival thus far has come from the United States. A NATO bureaucracy can’t prevent a US president from simply not requesting more aid.

The more interesting angle is the domestic effort to constrain the president. In a thinly veiled effort to hamstring Trump, Senators Tim Kaine and Marco Rubio authored a bill that Congress passed last year prohibiting the use of any funds “to support, directly or indirectly, any decision on the part of any United States Government official to suspend, terminate, denounce, or withdraw the United States from the North Atlantic Treaty” without two-thirds of the Senate approving.

This legal formalist approach is unlikely to constrain a motivated president. Trump wouldn’t have to do a mortgage’s worth of paperwork to distance the United States from being taken advantage of by Europe. He could simply walk to a podium and say, “You know, when you look at Article 5, some people, the worst people, are saying that this means Americans have to protect Europeans forever. I think Article 5 means something different. Something very different, something beautiful, actually. And you know, Article 11, maybe the most beautiful article of all, says the treaty needs to be ‘carried out by the Parties in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.’ So this idea that America would automatically go to war for these European freeloaders… Well, I would never do that.”

In the same speech, he could repeat the pledge he made to David Sacks on the All-In Podcast that he would never send US troops to Ukraine and make clear, as a consequence, that he opposed letting Ukraine join the alliance.

Such a speech would be an enormous blow to NATO. It would make clear Washington’s waning interest in being the cornerstone of European security and call into question what Joe Biden and Kamala Harris called the “sacred” nature of the US commitment. Trump could do this without spending a single congressionally allocated dollar.

Instead, or in addition to a speech making clear his interpretation of Article 5, Trump could just Irish goodbye the alliance. He could do this in any number of ways: removing tens of thousands of troops from Germany, for example, or participating at a lower level—or none at all—in alliance military planning. He could insist that the next Supreme Allied Commander be a European, which none has ever been before. Any of these moves, much less all of them, would come as a massive shock to Europe.

By giving a speech like the one I outline above, or by Irish goodbying the alliance, or by doing both, Trump would dare Congress to invoke its legislation to stop him by taking the question to a judiciary that has been exceedingly deferential to the executive on foreign policy questions. It seems unlikely that the jurisprudence surrounding presidential authority in foreign policy could regulate his speechmaking or his movement of forces overseas.

Washington’s blank check to Ukraine has gone on too long, as has its dominance of European security affairs. Trump has a generational opportunity to renegotiate the division of labor on European security and get American taxpayers and servicemembers a better deal.

If he wants to, Congress and NATO likely cannot stop him.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Solar Panels, Open Lands, and Federalism
next post
Election night winners and losers: 2024 edition

You may also like

Spending Cuts for 2025

November 19, 2024

Freight Rail Safety in the Year Since the...

February 6, 2024

To Close the Budget Deficit, Uncle Sam Should...

February 26, 2025

The Rational Basis Test Is an Unconstitutional Kludge

February 27, 2025

More Bank Lending Won’t Cure China’s Ills

January 31, 2024

Affordable Housing: Subsidies Raise Costs

March 20, 2024

OECD’s Pillar One: A Step Towards Chaos Rather...

October 30, 2023

The Untested Assumptions in SEC Chair Gensler’s Pivot...

July 31, 2023

Surprisingly, the World Is Becoming More Equal

June 8, 2023

Modi’s India Is Better in Economics than History

June 21, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Maybe Most People Do Not Want Teacher-Led Public School Prayer—But They Do Want Chaplains

      June 27, 2025
    • Flashback: The debate night against Trump that threw Biden’s reelection campaign into a free fall

      June 27, 2025
    • How to Improve your Trading Odds and Increase Opportunities

      June 27, 2025
    • UK Export Finance unveils new tools to boost SME global trade

      June 27, 2025
    • Republicans raise alarm over US vulnerability to mass drone strikes after Israel-Iran conflict

      June 27, 2025
    • Manchester businessman cleared of hacking charges in ICO case

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,075)
    • Politics (15,826)
    • Stocks (3,173)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved