Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Lesson from Oregon: Drug Decriminalization Is a Partial Solution, at Best

by November 7, 2024
November 7, 2024
The Lesson from Oregon: Drug Decriminalization Is a Partial Solution, at Best

Jeffrey Miron and Jacob Winter

Libertarians believe that drug prohibition is costly and ineffective. Prohibition encourages violence, since participants in banned activities cannot use legal, peaceful means to resolve disputes. Moreover, people who transact drugs are already hiding from authorities and thus are less concerned about employing violence. Underground markets also increase overdoses and poisonings since quality control is difficult. Prohibition reduces respect for the law, inhibits medicinal use of various drugs, promotes racial profiling and infringements on civil liberties, and spreads violence and corruption both domestically and in source countries.

In 2020, Oregon decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs such as fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine. Earlier this year, however, Oregon recriminalized drugs in response to high rates of overdose deaths and open-air drug use. Free-market skeptics claim the state’s unsuccessful policy experiment is evidence supporting prohibition.

This view is incorrect. First, recent research found that fentanyl saturated Oregon’s illegal drug market around the same time that decriminalization went into effect. The study found that this spread of fentanyl caused the increase in deaths, which would have happened regardless of decriminalization.

Second, Oregon’s policy failed not because it legalized possession but because it failed to legalize supply. Under decriminalization, drug users must still buy from the underground market. This leaves the negatives of prohibition in place, including the incentive for suppliers to lace drugs with fentanyl to minimize the volume of contraband.

Decriminalization reduces penalties for use, which is presumably good for drug users, but this may exacerbate the negatives of prohibition because reduced penalties for possession might increase demand for drugs, implying a larger underground market and more of the attendant ills. Thus, if policymakers legalize only one side of the market, the right approach is to legalize supply rather than demand. This would reduce violence in the underground drug market and allow consumers to protect themselves against laced substances through legal channels.

Indeed, successful decriminalization experiments like Portugal’s relaxed supply-side enforcement. Since 2010, the proportion of people serving sentences for drug offenses has fallen, and the number of heroin and cocaine seizures has declined despite rising throughout Europe. Penalties for trafficking and dealing drugs have also lessened. At the same time, the crime and homicide rates have dropped by 1.13 per 100,000 people since 2000, suggesting that their policy changes reduced supply-side violence.

Beyond these points, effective legalization must repeal federal prohibition. While state-by-state legalization is valuable, in part because it signals popular opposition to prohibition, state legalizations leave many issues in legal limbo. Many banks refuse to work in the marijuana industry, leaving cash-only dispensaries vulnerable to theft while complicating their transactions. Moreover, the federal tax code bars dispensaries from deducting typical business expenses from gross profits. Until federal prohibition ends, the clash between state and federal regulations will prevent the marijuana industry—and society at large—from reaping the full benefits of legalization.

This article appeared on Substack on November 6, 2024. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard University, assisted with the production of this post.  

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Best Political Argument for More Immigration Restrictions Just Failed
next post
‘Doomed’: Experts say this crucial campaign decision led to VP Harris’ ‘disastrous’ defeat

You may also like

Disbarment, Attorney Discipline, and Occupational Licensing

June 20, 2023

Friday Feature: Christian Halls International

October 5, 2024

No, Overruling Chevron Won’t Turn Judges into Policymakers

July 3, 2024

Maritime Protectionism Continues to Plague Offshore Wind Development

May 30, 2023

Democracies, Autocracies, and Same‐​Sex Unions

May 3, 2023

DOGE and “Waste, Fraud, and Abuse”

February 20, 2025

FERC’s Order No. 1920: A Costly Shell Game

May 16, 2024

Tariffs and Agriculture: Reaping What You Sow?

May 5, 2025

California Insurance Market: Another Victim of the War...

January 10, 2025

Government Debt Varies Widely by State

July 19, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Bank of England expected to cut interest rates to 4% amid weakening UK economy

      August 7, 2025
    • OpenAI in talks over $500bn share sale, potentially surpassing SpaceX in value

      August 7, 2025
    • UK construction activity slumps to lowest level since Covid amid housing slowdown

      August 7, 2025
    • Getting to Know You: Stuart Davis, CEO & co-founder, Dubs Universe

      August 7, 2025
    • TSB brand under threat as £2.65bn sale to Santander approved by Sabadell shareholders

      August 7, 2025
    • Junk food banned from SNAP benefits in 6 more states, a win for MAHA advocates

      August 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,696)
    • Investing (2,179)
    • Politics (16,329)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved