Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Lesson from Oregon: Drug Decriminalization Is a Partial Solution, at Best

by November 7, 2024
November 7, 2024
The Lesson from Oregon: Drug Decriminalization Is a Partial Solution, at Best

Jeffrey Miron and Jacob Winter

Libertarians believe that drug prohibition is costly and ineffective. Prohibition encourages violence, since participants in banned activities cannot use legal, peaceful means to resolve disputes. Moreover, people who transact drugs are already hiding from authorities and thus are less concerned about employing violence. Underground markets also increase overdoses and poisonings since quality control is difficult. Prohibition reduces respect for the law, inhibits medicinal use of various drugs, promotes racial profiling and infringements on civil liberties, and spreads violence and corruption both domestically and in source countries.

In 2020, Oregon decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs such as fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine. Earlier this year, however, Oregon recriminalized drugs in response to high rates of overdose deaths and open-air drug use. Free-market skeptics claim the state’s unsuccessful policy experiment is evidence supporting prohibition.

This view is incorrect. First, recent research found that fentanyl saturated Oregon’s illegal drug market around the same time that decriminalization went into effect. The study found that this spread of fentanyl caused the increase in deaths, which would have happened regardless of decriminalization.

Second, Oregon’s policy failed not because it legalized possession but because it failed to legalize supply. Under decriminalization, drug users must still buy from the underground market. This leaves the negatives of prohibition in place, including the incentive for suppliers to lace drugs with fentanyl to minimize the volume of contraband.

Decriminalization reduces penalties for use, which is presumably good for drug users, but this may exacerbate the negatives of prohibition because reduced penalties for possession might increase demand for drugs, implying a larger underground market and more of the attendant ills. Thus, if policymakers legalize only one side of the market, the right approach is to legalize supply rather than demand. This would reduce violence in the underground drug market and allow consumers to protect themselves against laced substances through legal channels.

Indeed, successful decriminalization experiments like Portugal’s relaxed supply-side enforcement. Since 2010, the proportion of people serving sentences for drug offenses has fallen, and the number of heroin and cocaine seizures has declined despite rising throughout Europe. Penalties for trafficking and dealing drugs have also lessened. At the same time, the crime and homicide rates have dropped by 1.13 per 100,000 people since 2000, suggesting that their policy changes reduced supply-side violence.

Beyond these points, effective legalization must repeal federal prohibition. While state-by-state legalization is valuable, in part because it signals popular opposition to prohibition, state legalizations leave many issues in legal limbo. Many banks refuse to work in the marijuana industry, leaving cash-only dispensaries vulnerable to theft while complicating their transactions. Moreover, the federal tax code bars dispensaries from deducting typical business expenses from gross profits. Until federal prohibition ends, the clash between state and federal regulations will prevent the marijuana industry—and society at large—from reaping the full benefits of legalization.

This article appeared on Substack on November 6, 2024. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard University, assisted with the production of this post.  

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Best Political Argument for More Immigration Restrictions Just Failed
next post
‘Doomed’: Experts say this crucial campaign decision led to VP Harris’ ‘disastrous’ defeat

You may also like

Extraterritorial Taxation: Is It All Our Fault?

August 7, 2023

Government Proposes To Make Bad Standards on Race...

April 20, 2023

Addressing Foreign Assaults on American Expression and Innovation:...

December 18, 2024

GAO Finds 218 Percent Arrest Increase with Police...

November 5, 2024

In Memoriam: Fred Smith

December 6, 2024

House Budget Committee Advances Fiscal Commission to Address...

January 23, 2024

Unprecedented Student Visa Denials in 2022: 35% Rejected

May 31, 2023

The Economist Gets It Wrong on Dollarization in...

September 25, 2023

Public Schools Can’t Force Employees to Support Ideas...

May 26, 2023

Crime Rates, Not the Number of Crimes, Are...

April 17, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Mark Cuban urges young people to focus on AI integration skills for career success

      August 27, 2025
    • Financial Times owner Nikkei sues Perplexity AI over copyright infringement claims

      August 27, 2025
    • Debenhams considers sale of Pretty Little Thing in bid to accelerate turnaround

      August 27, 2025
    • UK firms spent up to £65m on post-Brexit food export licences last year as Labour pledges to scrap scheme

      August 27, 2025
    • The executive burnout: Why rested founders build better businesses

      August 27, 2025
    • Nearly £1bn wiped off UK retailers’ market value as Deutsche Bank ‘fear index’ warns of consumer squeeze

      August 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,892)
    • Investing (2,242)
    • Politics (16,498)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved