Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

New sick pay rules risk dismissals as businesses grapple with Rayner’s reforms

by December 9, 2024
December 9, 2024
New sick pay rules risk dismissals as businesses grapple with Rayner’s reforms

Recruiters have warned that Angela Rayner’s proposed overhaul of workers’ rights could force employers to sack staff who fall ill for extended periods, as businesses grapple with new cost burdens at a time of escalating employment expenses.

Under the government’s plans, employees will be able to claim statutory sick pay (SSP) from the first day of absence instead of the fourth. The earnings threshold, currently set at £123 per week, will be scrapped, making more people eligible for SSP. While hailed as a boost to workplace support, critics say the move risks saddling businesses—especially small firms—with unsustainable costs.

Shazia Ejaz of the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) warned that higher outlays stemming from the reforms could encourage employers to “move swiftly to capability-based dismissal” if staff remain off work for lengthy periods or suffer repeated absences. She added that smaller businesses, which make up a substantial share of the labour market, would shoulder 60 per cent of the extra SSP costs.

With the government’s wider employment reforms also including a £25 billion rise in employers’ National Insurance Contributions and the most recent in a series of sharp minimum wage increases, companies face a mounting tally of additional costs. Ms Ejaz said: “A balance between worker support and business sustainability is necessary.” Setting SSP at a more manageable level could, she suggests, encourage employers to retain staff rather than resorting to layoffs.

The proposed measures form part of a broader package to enhance workers’ rights, which includes tighter restrictions on zero-hours contracts and tougher rules against “fire and rehire” practices. Deputy Prime Minister Rayner has described it as “the biggest upgrade to rights at work for a generation,” claiming it will raise both pay and productivity in a modernised employment landscape.

However, the Regulatory Policy Committee, an independent body charged with scrutinising new regulations, branded the package “not fit for purpose” due to insufficient analysis of how businesses will pass on these costs. Government estimates put the annual price tag for businesses at more than £4.5 billion.

Agency workers are set to be particularly hard-hit by the expansion of SSP eligibility, Ms Ejaz said, with agencies likely to shoulder the lion’s share of the financial burden rather than passing it onto clients. Faced with higher costs, businesses are expected to respond by cutting job creation, limiting wage growth, or raising consumer prices, according to recent surveys.

A spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions defended the changes, arguing that no one should be forced to choose between health and financial hardship. “These reforms as part of the Employment Rights Bill will support people managing a health condition to stay in work and raise living standards across the country,” he said. The department is now reviewing responses to a public consultation, promising to proceed “at pace” as it shapes the final legislation.

Read more:
New sick pay rules risk dismissals as businesses grapple with Rayner’s reforms

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
British retailer warns Reeves’s budget will deliver a £50m ‘punch in the face’
next post
Car finance crisis set to cost billions and dent investor confidence, warns Lloyds boss

You may also like

Google Mulls Charging for Premium AI-Powered Search Results

April 5, 2024

10 Tips to Pick Long-Term Investment Opportunities

September 27, 2024

Hunt set to announce a 2p cut in...

March 6, 2024

Crowdfunding specialists appoint X Factor producer as new...

March 20, 2023

Labour Could Cut Taxes by £16bn, Say Economists

June 27, 2024

Get It Made launches new fund to champion...

June 6, 2023

The Impact of the Tourist Tax on Retail...

August 14, 2023

Getting To Know You: Shiraz Master, Managing Director,...

January 25, 2023

Google’s emissions surge 48% in five years due...

July 4, 2024

Getting to Know You: Amy Knight, Co-Founder of...

August 5, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Starmer accused of betraying farmers as British food pledge stalls

      August 22, 2025
    • Fed rate cut looms after Powell’s Jackson Hole speech

      August 22, 2025
    • Tariff “Inclusion” Process Comes with High Costs, Absurd Outcomes, and Extra Cronyism

      August 22, 2025
    • Trump DOJ releases ‘thousands’ of Epstein files to House Oversight Committee

      August 22, 2025
    • Jackson scathing dissent levels partisan charge at colleagues after high-profile ruling

      August 22, 2025
    • ‘Leftist’ taxpayer-funded academy sparks backlash after moving against Trump’s rollback of key regulation

      August 22, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,857)
    • Investing (2,235)
    • Politics (16,464)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved