Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

DOGE Recommendations: Emergency Spending

by December 17, 2024
December 17, 2024
DOGE Recommendations: Emergency Spending

Romina Boccia and Dominik Lett

As part of the Cato Institute Report to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), we submitted the following recommendations to address the abuse of emergency designations and advance fiscal responsibility.

Emergency spending is out of control. Congress has designated nearly $12 trillion as emergency-related spending since 1992, circumventing statutory spending limits and enabling inflationary deficit spending. Moreover, reliance on emergency designations and powers is growing, with emergency funds accounting for 12 percent of total budget authority over the past decade. Prior emergency responses, even when unwise, end up justifying future emergency expenditures. This puts the United States in a perpetual state of emergency. Congress and the administration should rein in emergency spending.

Emergency spending surges, such as during the Great Recession and COVID-19 pandemic, are often initiated before the full scope of the emergency is fully understood, exacerbating waste, fraud, and abuse. At least $1 in every $10 of pandemic relief funds was estimated to have been stolen, wasted, or misspent. Furthermore, tens of billions in emergency funds are regularly misused for predictable, nonemergency priorities, such as annual law enforcement salaries. This violates statutory criteria for emergency designations: necessary, sudden, urgent, unforeseen, and temporary. 

This erosion of fiscal norms, in which emergency spending is paid for with borrowed funds to be repaid later, undermines the United States’ financial credibility and brings America closer to a fiscal crisis. A more prudent approach to emergencies would be limited, targeted fiscal measures offset with spending cuts to low-priority programs.

The current federal disaster relief system is a bloated mess with a patchwork of agencies that poorly handle overlapping responsibilities. The result is waste and the crowding out of state, local, and private organizations that would otherwise provide for those directly affected by disasters. 

Moreover, the existing disaster framework creates a moral hazard by covering any catastrophic costs that arise from living or developing property in high-risk areas, thus shifting the financial risk from property owners to taxpayers. This misalignment of incentives leads to escalating costs and repeated bailouts, undermining disaster preparedness, subsidizing dangerous living patterns, and promoting fiscal irresponsibility.

Congress should do the following:

Offset emergency spending by establishing a budgetary mechanism requiring any emergency funding be paid for with immediate or future spending cuts over a 5- to 10-year window.
Raise emergency spending voting thresholds by increasing the number of votes required to waive Senate points of order against emergency designations from three-fifths to three-fourths.
Restrict presidential emergency declarations to 30 days unless reauthorized by Congress.
Remove emergency spending from the budget baseline.
Require legislators to justify how new emergency expenditures meet existing emergency criteria.
Regularly track and report on emergency spending.
Rescind any remaining unobligated COVID-19 funding.
Eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Barring full repeal,

cut spending, including by ending future spending on disasters that occurred five years in the past or earlier, and
change the default cost-sharing ratio for FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund so that states pay for a larger share of the costs of disaster and recovery activities.

Privatize the National Flood Insurance Program.
Avoid enacting federal anti–price gouging laws. Allowing prices to adjust in response to changes in market conditions guarantees that goods and services demanded in disaster zones are allocated efficiently to those in greatest need.
Eliminate the Small Business Administration.
Eliminate most of the more than 30 federal entities involved in disaster recovery and consolidate only those narrowly defined legitimate federal functions into a single agency.

The president should do the following:

Direct a government-wide review of all disaster-related programs to identify overlap and eliminate redundant or low-performing initiatives.
Make National Emergency Act expenditure reports more detailed and publicly available.
Reject appropriations bills that contain phony emergency designations.
If the president requests an emergency supplemental package, he should

justify why each emergency provision meets statutory criteria for emergencies, and
offer rescissions to offset new emergency expenditures.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Dems push drastic move that Mike Lee calls ‘a phenomenally bad idea’
next post
Ten Years of the Human Freedom Index

You may also like

Treating Business Costs Correctly in the Tax Code

September 5, 2024

Trade in Barbieland!

September 21, 2023

British Columbia Should Legalize, Not Recriminalize, Drugs

June 18, 2024

Can Million-Dollar Apartments Solve California’s Housing Crisis?

October 18, 2024

A Carbon Tariff Is a Carbon Tax for...

October 30, 2023

Follow Up on Bank Secrecy Act Data

June 5, 2023

Remembering David Boaz

June 7, 2024

The Latest International Exam Scores Look Bad—Are They?

December 4, 2024

Reviewing the Case Against a Border-Adjusted Corporate Income...

October 17, 2024

Governor Tim Walz’s Fiscal Record

August 9, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Olivier v. City of Brandon Brief: Protecting the Right to Recover for Free Speech Violations

      August 29, 2025
    • Is Putin stringing Trump along to sidestep US sanctions while bombing Ukraine?

      August 29, 2025
    • House investigators nix Mueller testimony in Epstein probe over health concerns

      August 29, 2025
    • Shakedowns and a Sovereign Wealth Fund

      August 29, 2025
    • Witkoff meets Ukraine officials in New York ahead of emergency UN Security Council meeting: ‘Very productive’

      August 29, 2025
    • Senators demand oversight, reject vaccine guidance as illegitimate as CDC turmoil rages

      August 29, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,920)
    • Investing (2,256)
    • Politics (16,521)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved