Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Equal Rights Amendment Isn’t Part of the Constitution

by December 18, 2024
December 18, 2024
The Equal Rights Amendment Isn’t Part of the Constitution

Walter Olson

The Equal Rights Amendment failed when its time limit expired before it could be ratified by 34 states; several states have also moved to rescind their previous approvals. But in recent weeks, advocates, including 46 senators led by Kirsten Gillibrand (D‑NY), 100 members of the House of Representatives, the League of Women Voters, and 23 state attorneys general, have urged President Biden to insert the Equal Rights Amendment into the Constitution by decree, given additional ratifications after the time limit, by ordering the archivist to publish it as a duly enacted Twenty-Eighth Amendment.

In a statement yesterday, Archivist Colleen Shogan and Deputy Archivist William J. Bosanko stated that they lack any legal power to carry out such an order, saying that the Equal Rights Amendment “cannot be certified as part of the Constitution due to established legal, judicial, and procedural decisions.” Shogan and Bosanko should be applauded for insisting that legality must come first, even when it conflicts with the prevailing opinion in the governing party.

This is not the first runaround for the issue. I wrote about it in 2020 when advocates tried a similar move, a lawsuit in which the attorneys general of Virginia, Illinois, and Nevada sued the archivist, demanding recognition of the amendment as validly ratified. (The suit failed.)

Shortly after that, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg drew widespread notice when she publicly criticized efforts to declare the Equal Rights Amendment ratified in the face of the expiration date and the rescissions. “I would like to see a new beginning. I’d like it to start over,” she told a Georgetown Law audience. “There’s too much controversy about a latecomer Virginia ratifying long after the deadline passed. Plus, a number of states have withdrawn their ratification. If you count a latecomer on the plus side, how can you disregard states that said, ‘We’ve changed our minds’?”

Ginsburg was, of course, a lifelong and vigorous advocate of the Equal Rights Amendment, but as one scholar has pointed out, over the years she came to emphasize its “expressive, rather than doctrinal significance.” One reason is that a long line of Supreme Court opinions has developed the equivalent of an Equal Rights Amendment in practice through the Equal Protection Clause, with statutory enactments filling in further gaps.

Ignoring Ginsburg’s advice now would, at best, invite a Supreme Court strike-down, if not further constitutional complications, for no apparent gain. Is setting up constitutional collisions between branches of government now somehow seen as fun or productive in itself?

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
How to Improve Network Security in a Small Business
next post
The Future of Interactive Online Experiences: How Emerging Technologies Are Transforming Customer Engagement

You may also like

New Essay: Public Health as If People Mattered

March 18, 2025

Milking the System: The Problem with Licensing Lactation...

December 10, 2024

Deceptive Advertising on the Ballot

November 4, 2024

New Trump Administration Proposals Would Increase US Shipping...

February 26, 2025

Friday Feature: Kind Academy

July 7, 2023

CBDC vs. Crypto: What’s the Difference?

May 31, 2023

Call for Papers: Cato Health Policy Workshop 2025

April 23, 2025

At Least They Asked This Time: Treasury Department’s...

December 6, 2023

An Ominous Quiet on the Law Firm Revenge...

May 21, 2025

Trump’s Immunity Claims Aren’t Likely To Let Him...

January 4, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • EDF buys EV charger firm pod point for just £10m – four years after £352m london float

      June 12, 2025
    • Public opinion turns against Trump-backed tax and spending bill, new survey finds

      June 12, 2025
    • Pentagon may sink Biden-era deal to sell Australia nuclear-powered submarines

      June 12, 2025
    • California Dem tells Hegseth he’s an ’embarrassment’ to the US, should ‘get the hell out’ of the DOD

      June 12, 2025
    • RFK Jr. picks eight for vaccine panel after firing all 17 members

      June 12, 2025
    • Poll: Musk’s favorability among Republicans drops 16 points after Trump feud

      June 12, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,200)
    • Investing (2,030)
    • Politics (15,614)
    • Stocks (3,142)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved