Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Equal Rights Amendment Isn’t Part of the Constitution

by December 18, 2024
December 18, 2024
The Equal Rights Amendment Isn’t Part of the Constitution

Walter Olson

The Equal Rights Amendment failed when its time limit expired before it could be ratified by 34 states; several states have also moved to rescind their previous approvals. But in recent weeks, advocates, including 46 senators led by Kirsten Gillibrand (D‑NY), 100 members of the House of Representatives, the League of Women Voters, and 23 state attorneys general, have urged President Biden to insert the Equal Rights Amendment into the Constitution by decree, given additional ratifications after the time limit, by ordering the archivist to publish it as a duly enacted Twenty-Eighth Amendment.

In a statement yesterday, Archivist Colleen Shogan and Deputy Archivist William J. Bosanko stated that they lack any legal power to carry out such an order, saying that the Equal Rights Amendment “cannot be certified as part of the Constitution due to established legal, judicial, and procedural decisions.” Shogan and Bosanko should be applauded for insisting that legality must come first, even when it conflicts with the prevailing opinion in the governing party.

This is not the first runaround for the issue. I wrote about it in 2020 when advocates tried a similar move, a lawsuit in which the attorneys general of Virginia, Illinois, and Nevada sued the archivist, demanding recognition of the amendment as validly ratified. (The suit failed.)

Shortly after that, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg drew widespread notice when she publicly criticized efforts to declare the Equal Rights Amendment ratified in the face of the expiration date and the rescissions. “I would like to see a new beginning. I’d like it to start over,” she told a Georgetown Law audience. “There’s too much controversy about a latecomer Virginia ratifying long after the deadline passed. Plus, a number of states have withdrawn their ratification. If you count a latecomer on the plus side, how can you disregard states that said, ‘We’ve changed our minds’?”

Ginsburg was, of course, a lifelong and vigorous advocate of the Equal Rights Amendment, but as one scholar has pointed out, over the years she came to emphasize its “expressive, rather than doctrinal significance.” One reason is that a long line of Supreme Court opinions has developed the equivalent of an Equal Rights Amendment in practice through the Equal Protection Clause, with statutory enactments filling in further gaps.

Ignoring Ginsburg’s advice now would, at best, invite a Supreme Court strike-down, if not further constitutional complications, for no apparent gain. Is setting up constitutional collisions between branches of government now somehow seen as fun or productive in itself?

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
How to Improve Network Security in a Small Business
next post
The Future of Interactive Online Experiences: How Emerging Technologies Are Transforming Customer Engagement

You may also like

Governor DeSantis Tells Residents of the “Free State...

May 3, 2024

Jones Act Exacerbates US Ferry System Struggles

May 7, 2024

Ten Spending Cuts for President Trump

November 8, 2024

Intrusive and Unnecessary Social Media Mandates in the...

June 6, 2024

From Debt Ceiling Crisis to Debt Crisis

May 22, 2023

Warren, Trump, and the Debt Limit

June 25, 2025

Social Security’s $4.1 Trillion Hidden Government Deficit

July 2, 2024

David Boaz, Our Great Persuader

June 7, 2024

High Court Sticks With Flawed Racial‐​Redistricting Standard

June 8, 2023

Is Nuclear Power’s High Cost Justified for Clean...

November 5, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Hawley opens probe into Meta after reports of AI romantic exchanges with minors

      August 15, 2025
    • Friday Feature: Braveheart Christian Academy

      August 15, 2025
    • From admiration to Alaska: A timeline of Trump and Putin’s high-stakes encounters

      August 15, 2025
    • Schumer claims Trump admin withholding Epstein files, threatens to sue

      August 15, 2025
    • UK prices for Mounjaro weight-loss jab to rise by up to 170% after Trump pressure on drugmakers

      August 15, 2025
    • UK workers rank among the world’s most miserable, survey finds

      August 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,796)
    • Investing (2,216)
    • Politics (16,392)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved