Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

DOJ Jumps the Shark

by December 24, 2024
December 24, 2024
DOJ Jumps the Shark

Clark Neily

Imagine you were operating a shark-diving charter boat in Florida and came across a long fishing line that you believed to be the work of poachers. You haul in the line, release a number of fish, and take the rig back to the marina after notifying state officials.

If it turns out you were mistaken and had actually stumbled onto a bona fide research project, would it be fair to charge you with “stealing” the line you hauled in and left on the dock? The US Department of Justice thought so and pursued felony charges against the two boat operators, John Moore and Tanner Mansell, for theft of property within the “special maritime jurisdiction” of the United States.

A jury reluctantly convicted Moore and Mansell after deliberating for longer than the entire trial took, sending out seven (!) notes to the judge, and nearly deadlocking. The Eleventh Circuit reluctantly affirmed, with Judge Barbara Lagoa—herself a former federal prosecutor—castigating the Assistant United States Attorney by name in her concurrence for “taking a page out of Inspector Javert’s playbook.” She noted that Moore and Mansell “never sought to derive any benefit from their conduct” and have been branded as lifelong felons “for having violated a statute that no reasonable person would understand to prohibit the conduct they engaged in.”

Yesterday, Cato filed an amicus brief urging the court to grant en banc review and reverse the convictions. The brief explains that for centuries, the greatest protection against unjust convictions and punishments was the institution of jury independence, including so-called “jury nullification.” But because modern judges have effectively nullified the power to nullify, it is all the more important that other defendant-protecting doctrines—such as the rule of lenity—be applied robustly. 

Because the jury instructions in this case reflected a broad conception of the word “steal” rather than a narrow one, Moore and Mansell are entitled to a new trial with a properly instructed jury.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges
next post
MUST SEE Options Trade Ideas! DIS, AAPL, META, BA, LULU

You may also like

Economic Growth Won’t Save Social Security: New Paper...

February 12, 2025

New York’s Hate Speech Law Violates the First...

September 29, 2023

Major EU Regulator Threatens Free Social Media by...

April 23, 2024

NRA v. Vullo: A Big First Amendment Win...

May 31, 2024

The Government Doesn’t Want You Using Cash

June 28, 2024

R.I.P. Newton Minow

May 10, 2023

James Buckley and Federalism

August 21, 2023

Sorry Unions, China Isn’t Responsible for US Shipbuilding...

March 18, 2024

High Protective Tariffs Have Been Short-Lived in American...

April 8, 2025

Autonomy and Affordability: Solving Homelessness Without Coercion

December 13, 2024

Economic Growth Won’t Save Social Security: New Paper...

February 12, 2025

New York’s Hate Speech Law Violates the First...

September 29, 2023

Major EU Regulator Threatens Free Social Media by...

April 23, 2024

NRA v. Vullo: A Big First Amendment Win...

May 31, 2024

The Government Doesn’t Want You Using Cash

June 28, 2024

R.I.P. Newton Minow

May 10, 2023

James Buckley and Federalism

August 21, 2023

Sorry Unions, China Isn’t Responsible for US Shipbuilding...

March 18, 2024

High Protective Tariffs Have Been Short-Lived in American...

April 8, 2025

Autonomy and Affordability: Solving Homelessness Without Coercion

December 13, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Here’s What’s Fueling the Moves in Bitcoin, Gaming, and Metals

      July 12, 2025
    • Inside longtime Biden aide’s marathon closed-door grilling in House GOP cover-up probe

      July 12, 2025
    • David Gergen, trusted White House advisor to 4 US presidents across decades, dies at 83

      July 11, 2025
    • 3 Stocks Seasoned Investors Should Watch

      July 11, 2025
    • What Happens Next for the S&P 500? Pick Your Path!

      July 11, 2025
    • The First Amendment Protects Ideologically Based Ad Boycotts

      July 11, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,454)
    • Investing (2,118)
    • Politics (16,011)
    • Stocks (3,205)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved