Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

DOJ Jumps the Shark

by December 24, 2024
December 24, 2024
DOJ Jumps the Shark

Clark Neily

Imagine you were operating a shark-diving charter boat in Florida and came across a long fishing line that you believed to be the work of poachers. You haul in the line, release a number of fish, and take the rig back to the marina after notifying state officials.

If it turns out you were mistaken and had actually stumbled onto a bona fide research project, would it be fair to charge you with “stealing” the line you hauled in and left on the dock? The US Department of Justice thought so and pursued felony charges against the two boat operators, John Moore and Tanner Mansell, for theft of property within the “special maritime jurisdiction” of the United States.

A jury reluctantly convicted Moore and Mansell after deliberating for longer than the entire trial took, sending out seven (!) notes to the judge, and nearly deadlocking. The Eleventh Circuit reluctantly affirmed, with Judge Barbara Lagoa—herself a former federal prosecutor—castigating the Assistant United States Attorney by name in her concurrence for “taking a page out of Inspector Javert’s playbook.” She noted that Moore and Mansell “never sought to derive any benefit from their conduct” and have been branded as lifelong felons “for having violated a statute that no reasonable person would understand to prohibit the conduct they engaged in.”

Yesterday, Cato filed an amicus brief urging the court to grant en banc review and reverse the convictions. The brief explains that for centuries, the greatest protection against unjust convictions and punishments was the institution of jury independence, including so-called “jury nullification.” But because modern judges have effectively nullified the power to nullify, it is all the more important that other defendant-protecting doctrines—such as the rule of lenity—be applied robustly. 

Because the jury instructions in this case reflected a broad conception of the word “steal” rather than a narrow one, Moore and Mansell are entitled to a new trial with a properly instructed jury.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Top Biden ally ‘disappointed’ by president’s veto on bill to increase number of US judges
next post
MUST SEE Options Trade Ideas! DIS, AAPL, META, BA, LULU

You may also like

ICE Is Arresting 1,300 Percent More Noncriminals on...

June 24, 2025

Worried About Declining Marriage Rates? Our Ancestors May...

February 14, 2025

The Drug War Is Failing, So Let’s Try…...

March 10, 2025

Becoming Cato’s Fourth Director of Constitutional Studies

November 4, 2024

Friday Feature: Leading Little Arrows

February 16, 2024

Friday Feature: Innovation School

June 13, 2025

Medicaid Expansion Will Not Increase Mississippi’s Labor Force...

March 14, 2024

Friday Feature: Tapestry Academy and Microschool Florida

July 14, 2023

Friday Feature: The National Personal Finance Challenge

April 5, 2024

Inflation Has Been Coming Down So Fed’s Rate...

June 15, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally’s third party push

      July 8, 2025
    • Data Security Posture Management – The Next Big Data Solution Your Business Needs (And How to Get Started)

      July 7, 2025
    • Bondi under siege after DOJ reveals no Epstein client list

      July 7, 2025
    • Over 158 million Americans voted in 2024 as Trump reclaimed the White House

      July 7, 2025
    • US ends terrorist designation of Syrian militant leaders

      July 7, 2025
    • Haitian Immigrants Have a Low Incarceration Rate

      July 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,410)
    • Investing (2,105)
    • Politics (15,958)
    • Stocks (3,192)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved