Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

United States v. Pierre Brief: Categorical Felon Disarmament Violates the Second Amendment

by January 6, 2025
January 6, 2025
United States v. Pierre Brief: Categorical Felon Disarmament Violates the Second Amendment

Matthew Cavedon

Lorenzo Pierre was convicted in July 2022 for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Pierre appealed, arguing that his conviction, as applied, violates the Second Amendment. On appeal, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit twice affirmed Pierre’s conviction, following circuit precedent. Pierre is now asking the full court to decide whether a criminal defendant may raise an as-applied Second Amendment challenge to the federal “felon-in-possession” law. 

This law imposes a categorical, lifetime ban on firearm possession for any individual who has been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term of more than one year. Since the passage of this law, tens of thousands of such offenses—many of which society would not deem morally wrong—have been added to the books. Many of these crimes are neither particularly serious nor indicative of danger with a firearm, and the underlying conduct—such as cutting a fishing line—would not historically have sufficed to strip the perpetrator of their fundamental right to armed self-defense.

The Cato Institute filed an amicus brief arguing that the categorical disarmament of felons violates the Second Amendment. Exceptions to constitutional rights do not move with the political winds. Congress does not have unfettered power to define what counts as a felony and then use that categorization to abridge Second Amendment rights. History—not legislatures—determines the existence of exceptions to and the scope of individual rights. 

In assessing whether a particular defendant can be disarmed, courts must compare prior convictions to historical analogs. Permanently disarming every felon simply for being a felon is unconstitutional.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump reacts to Trudeau resignation: ‘Many people in Canada LOVE being the 51st State’
next post
Mental health disorders attributed to more service member hospital stays than any other ailment: DoD

You may also like

Chileans Vote to Step Back from the Socialist...

May 10, 2023

Some Simple Facts about U.S. Government Debt

July 10, 2023

Itinerant Baseball Team May “Need” More Taxpayer Funds

December 9, 2024

A Small City’s Financial Crisis Leaves Virginia at...

July 24, 2023

In Yale University ERISA Case, Plaintiffs Lose but...

July 19, 2023

New Defending Globalization Content: International Tax Competition and...

March 19, 2024

South Carolina School Choice Law Benefits the Public

February 13, 2024

Seventy Years after Brown, the Goal Must Be...

May 15, 2024

Friday Feature: Boone Prairie School

May 5, 2023

Solar Panels and Open Lands

November 6, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump warns of ‘serious consequences’ if Elon Musk funds Democrats

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff’s praise

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk deletes explosive posts about Trump and Epstein files

      June 7, 2025
    • House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed him during hearing with unearthed tweet: ‘Iceberg is ahead’

      June 7, 2025
    • Call with China’s Xi, and Trump-Musk exchange fueled barbs during 20th week in office

      June 7, 2025
    • Trump’s conservative allies warn Congress faces critical ‘test’ with $9.4B spending cut proposal

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,568)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved