Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Black Market Beckons: Biden’s Last-Minute Move on Nicotine

by January 7, 2025
January 7, 2025
The Black Market Beckons: Biden’s Last-Minute Move on Nicotine

Jeffrey A. Singer

Axios reports that the Biden Administration is planning an 11th-hour move to order cigarette manufacturers to reduce the nicotine content in the tobacco cigarettes they market to consumers—possibly by as much as 95 percent. The FDA proposed the rule in 2022, and the Office of Management and Budget cleared the rule proposal on January 3, 2025.

The Food and Drug Administration has not yet issued the rule but may do so within the next two weeks.

Nicotine is the addictive component of tobacco cigarettes, but by itself is relatively harmless. The harm comes from carbon monoxide, a poisonous gas, and tobacco tar that contains carcinogens and other chemicals that harm the lungs and circulatory system. Britain’s Royal Society for Public Health claims nicotine is “no more harmful to health than caffeine.” As I have written here, what differentiates nicotine from caffeine is that it has calming as well as stimulative effects.

Tobacco cigarettes are a type of nicotine delivery system. While some smokers may enjoy the flavor of tobacco and the act of smoking, many primarily smoke for the effects of nicotine.

The rationale behind ordering cigarette makers to reduce the nicotine content of tobacco cigarettes is that it might nudge smokers to abandon smoking. In 2018, FDA researchers reported in the New England Journal of Medicine that they used a simulation model that suggested reducing the nicotine content of tobacco cigarettes by 95 percent could lower the percentage of adult smokers to 1.4 percent by 2100.

Yet one randomized controlled study of the efficacy of reducing nicotine content to such levels found:

In smokers not interested in quitting, reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes over 12 months does not appear to result in extinction of nicotine dependence, assessed by persistently reduced nicotine intake or quitting smoking over the subsequent 12 months.

Some researchers have found that reducing the nicotine content may lead to a compensatory increase in cigarette consumption or increased puff volume to attain the nicotine effect. A team of researchers at the University of Pennsylvania reported in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence on a novel “within-subject human laboratory study” hypothesizing “that compensatory smoking, specifically greater total puff volume, would be observed as nicotine levels decreased, thereby supporting behavioral compensation. Further, due to increased total puff volume, we hypothesized increases in CO boost as nicotine levels decreased (i.e. biochemical evidence of compensation).” They found:

As hypothesized, both total puff volume and CO boost per cigarette increased when cigarette nicotine level decreased, although the effect was modest. Subjective ratings of cigarette strength and satisfaction were significantly lower for the lower-nicotine cigarettes.

Yet, other studies, such as this 4‑day study, failed to discern any increase in the number of cigarettes smokers consumed with decreased nicotine levels. Researchers at the University of Minnesota conducted a “secondary analysis of data” from studies where cigarette nicotine content was either gradually or immediately reduced and found:

The results showed that in general, these two approaches led to minimal compensatory smoking…over the course of the experimental period, suggesting that neither of these approaches poses a major safety concern.

Policymakers also aren’t considering that mandating cigarette makers to reduce nicotine will likely stimulate a healthy black market in higher-nicotine cigarettes, benefiting drug cartels and other criminal organizations. Menthol cigarette black markets have arisen in states and countries that have banned them. Ironically, the Biden administration has delayed a decision on a federal menthol cigarette ban, yet seems poised to generate a black market in regular cigarettes.

If policymakers want more people to quit tobacco smoking, they should remove barriers to tobacco harm reduction by increasing access to e‑cigarettes, including flavored ones preferred by smokers wishing to quit, nicotine pouches, and less harmful products like heated tobacco and snus. That way, people can get the nicotine they desire without utilizing the harmful tobacco cigarette delivery system.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Supreme Court Should Save TikTok
next post
Venezuela’s Maduro to start third term in office amid rigged election: ‘Blatant violation’

You may also like

High Court Upends Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy Settlement

June 27, 2024

On Inflation Reduction Act Reform, Anything Short of...

November 12, 2024

Who Loses from Immigration Restrictions?

January 23, 2025

The Lesson from Oregon: Drug Decriminalization Is a...

November 7, 2024

Grocery Price Gouging?

August 19, 2024

High Earners Make Relatively Smaller Tax Errors

May 23, 2023

Cato Seeks Injunction To Obtain DOJ Internal FISA...

February 22, 2024

High Costs of Low-Income Housing

December 18, 2023

New Ships Offer a Case Study in Protectionist...

October 11, 2024

The Whole DEI Project Is a “McCarthyite Witch...

May 2, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump ally stands firm against ‘big, beautiful bill’ despite pressure: ‘It’ll completely backfire’

      June 8, 2025
    • Rubio condemns assassination attempt on Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe

      June 8, 2025
    • Obama WH physician says Biden doc should have performed cognitive test

      June 8, 2025
    • Trump warns of ‘serious consequences’ if Elon Musk funds Democrats

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff’s praise

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk deletes explosive posts about Trump and Epstein files

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,571)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved