Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Certificate of Need Laws and Health Care Expenditures

by January 13, 2025
January 13, 2025
Certificate of Need Laws and Health Care Expenditures

Peter Van Doren

The Washington Post recently described a Nebraska Supreme Court case challenging so-called certificate-of-need (CON) laws that require state permission to operate a health care facility.

From 1965 until the early 1980s Medicare encouraged health care expenditures because of its cost-plus reimbursement framework. Rather than change the incentives in the reimbursement framework, the federal government responded with requirements that states enact CON programs that required permits for all large health care facility expenditures. The thinking was that because all medically necessary expenditures were reimbursed, one could constrain health care spending by restricting unnecessary capital expenditures. If you don’t build it, they won’t come.

Medicare changed its reimbursement practices in the mid-1980s and repealed the CON requirements in 1987. However, 35 states still retain CON programs.

An article in the Fall 2024 issue of Regulation examines the effect of CON entry restrictions on non-hospital surgery centers (also called ambulatory surgical centers or ASCs). In 1980, most surgeries took place in hospitals as in-patient procedures, with only sixteen percent performed on an outpatient basis in a few hundred ASCs nationwide. The market for surgeries looks dramatically different today. Eighty percent of surgeries occur in outpatient settings across almost 6,000 surgical centers nationwide.

Between 1991 and 2019, six states repealed their CON laws on ASCs. The article concludes that repealing ASC CON laws caused an increase in ASCs per capita of 44–47 percent and 92–112 percent in rural communities. By limiting the number of available ASCs, CON laws not only reduce competition between ASCs but also direct surgeries to the substantially more expensive hospital setting, increasing healthcare expenditures and burdening taxpayers. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Supermarket giant Morrisons backs farmers as inheritance tax row lands blow to Starmer
next post
‘Make Greenland Great Again’: Trump’s House GOP allies unveil bill to authorize country’s purchase

You may also like

Cato’s Contributions to Justice

May 29, 2025

Freight Rail Safety in the Year Since the...

February 6, 2024

Ninth Circuit: Prop 65 Warnings Can Count As...

March 29, 2024

Defending Globalization, Now Available in Paperback and Ebook

November 14, 2024

Leftist Victory in Mexico Puts Freedom at Risk

June 3, 2024

Naturalized Immigrants Probably Voted Republican in 2024

March 26, 2025

The FDA Finally Removes a Huge Barrier to...

March 7, 2025

House Bill Calls for an End to Government...

June 11, 2024

Campus Unrest: The Legal Framework

May 3, 2024

Social Security Spending Adds to the National Debt

June 5, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Universities in Libertarian Land

      June 6, 2025
    • Elon Musk may speak to Trump aides in push to calm feud

      June 6, 2025
    • Everyone Talks About Leaving a Better Planet for Our Children: Why Don’t We Leave Better Children for Our Planet?

      June 6, 2025
    • MARK HALPERIN: Democrats try to construct a Frankenstein candidate while JD Vance gains momentum for 2028

      June 6, 2025
    • ‘Gone too far’: GOP lawmakers rally around Trump after Musk raises Epstein allegations

      June 6, 2025
    • Democrats begin to embrace Musk amid Trump spat after party railed against him as a ‘dictator’

      June 6, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,149)
    • Investing (2,012)
    • Politics (15,544)
    • Stocks (3,130)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved