Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Certificate of Need Laws and Health Care Expenditures

by January 13, 2025
January 13, 2025
Certificate of Need Laws and Health Care Expenditures

Peter Van Doren

The Washington Post recently described a Nebraska Supreme Court case challenging so-called certificate-of-need (CON) laws that require state permission to operate a health care facility.

From 1965 until the early 1980s Medicare encouraged health care expenditures because of its cost-plus reimbursement framework. Rather than change the incentives in the reimbursement framework, the federal government responded with requirements that states enact CON programs that required permits for all large health care facility expenditures. The thinking was that because all medically necessary expenditures were reimbursed, one could constrain health care spending by restricting unnecessary capital expenditures. If you don’t build it, they won’t come.

Medicare changed its reimbursement practices in the mid-1980s and repealed the CON requirements in 1987. However, 35 states still retain CON programs.

An article in the Fall 2024 issue of Regulation examines the effect of CON entry restrictions on non-hospital surgery centers (also called ambulatory surgical centers or ASCs). In 1980, most surgeries took place in hospitals as in-patient procedures, with only sixteen percent performed on an outpatient basis in a few hundred ASCs nationwide. The market for surgeries looks dramatically different today. Eighty percent of surgeries occur in outpatient settings across almost 6,000 surgical centers nationwide.

Between 1991 and 2019, six states repealed their CON laws on ASCs. The article concludes that repealing ASC CON laws caused an increase in ASCs per capita of 44–47 percent and 92–112 percent in rural communities. By limiting the number of available ASCs, CON laws not only reduce competition between ASCs but also direct surgeries to the substantially more expensive hospital setting, increasing healthcare expenditures and burdening taxpayers. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Supermarket giant Morrisons backs farmers as inheritance tax row lands blow to Starmer
next post
‘Make Greenland Great Again’: Trump’s House GOP allies unveil bill to authorize country’s purchase

You may also like

Is Tort Reform the Way to Constrain Healthcare...

October 13, 2023

The Time to Prepare for AI Financial Agents...

February 7, 2025

Overdrafts on the Line

March 28, 2025

James L. Buckley, R.I.P.

August 18, 2023

Evaluating PDUFA: Paying for FDA Drug-Application Reviewers by...

March 7, 2025

Who Stopped the Rescue of Silicon Valley Bank?

April 20, 2023

Taxpayer Funding for Religious Schools?

June 13, 2023

Friday Feature: Eye of a Scientist

August 9, 2024

Affirmative Action in College Admissions

May 30, 2023

Anatomy of China’s Housing Crisis: Ending Financial Repression

November 14, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First Amendment Protections

      June 27, 2025
    • Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor Online Speech

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump secures record-shattering $1.4B for political war chest; will be ‘dominant force’ for GOP in midterms

      June 27, 2025
    • Trump says ‘big, beautiful’ bill ‘must’ meet deadline as some Republicans waver

      June 27, 2025
    • Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

      June 27, 2025
    • The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs, But That’s Not Enough

      June 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,329)
    • Investing (2,081)
    • Politics (15,837)
    • Stocks (3,174)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved