Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Perttu v. Richards Brief: Defending the Right to a Jury Trial for All Americans

by January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025
Perttu v. Richards Brief: Defending the Right to a Jury Trial for All Americans

Matthew Cavedon

On January 21, the Cato Institute filed an amicus brief in the case Perttu v. Richards, now pending before the Supreme Court, arguing that prisoners have a right to have a jury resolve disputes concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies.
Cato’s brief recounts how in this case, Kyle Richards, a prisoner, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit “alleging that Petitioner Thomas Perttu, a correctional officer, committed sexual misconduct against him and other inmates—then threatened Richards and destroyed the grievances he sought to file in order to exhaust his administrative remedies.”
Richards’ claims are subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), which requires inmates to exhaust prisons’ internal administrative processes before filing lawsuits. Richards alleges that he tried to exhaust these remedies, but Perttu destroyed his written grievances and threatened him against trying to file any more.
Without putting the issue to a jury, the district court determined that Richards had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and dismissed his suit. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Richards is entitled to a jury trial of the disputed facts concerning his efforts to exhaust his administrative remedies. The Supreme Court granted Perttu’s petition to review the case.
Cato’s amicus brief argues that Richards and other inmates are entitled to have a jury determine disputed facts concerning administrative exhaustion, especially when those factual disputes are inseparable from the merits of an inmate’s underlying claim. The Seventh Amendment guarantees Americans the right to a truly neutral fact-finder in the form of a jury in most civil cases, including those challenging government actions. 
This protection is especially important when government officials, such as the correctional officers in this case, have ready means of thwarting citizens’ efforts to pursue their claims through the courts. The Constitution assigns to juries, not judges, responsibility for resolving disputed facts in criminal cases and civil cases involving common-law causes of action (including federal civil rights claims)—and for good reason. No less than other citizens, PLRA litigants are thus entitled to have their claims decided by jurors, who are the constitutionally appointed fact-finders.
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Bookings Open for The Royal Ballet School’s 2025 Regional Winter Intensives
next post
Cisco Systems’ Stock Keeps Hitting All-Time Highs: Investment Tips to Maximize Your Success

You may also like

The Equal Rights Amendment Isn’t Part of the...

December 18, 2024

How to Make Temporary “Acting” Officers Accountable

April 9, 2024

Menthol Tobacco Ban Appears Inevitable. Expect a Healthy...

October 17, 2023

Ballot Disqualification: The Stakes

February 8, 2024

Crime Rates, Not the Number of Crimes, Are...

April 17, 2024

Most People Want Teacher-Led Prayer in Public Schools—It’s...

June 26, 2025

Should Defamation Lawsuits Exist?

January 13, 2025

Postal Reforms Abroad

April 10, 2025

FTC Gets 2/3 of the Infant Formula Crisis...

March 25, 2024

The US Military Role in the Red Sea...

January 13, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Revealed: The extensive perks UN officials receive amid budget crisis

      June 29, 2025
    • Trump administration takes on new battle shutting down initial Iran strike assessments

      June 29, 2025
    • Trump administration takes on new battle shutting down initial Iran strike assessments

      June 29, 2025
    • Schumer forces reading of Trump’s entire ‘big, beautiful bill’ as Senate braces for all-nighter

      June 29, 2025
    • Schumer forces reading of Trump’s entire ‘big, beautiful bill’ as Senate braces for all-nighter

      June 29, 2025
    • Trump, lawmakers react after ‘big, beautiful bill’ clears Senate hurdle

      June 29, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,334)
    • Investing (2,081)
    • Politics (15,858)
    • Stocks (3,177)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved