Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Tradeoffs Podcast: the Case for Medicaid Reform

by January 23, 2025
January 23, 2025
Tradeoffs Podcast: the Case for Medicaid Reform

Michael F. Cannon

If you’ve never listened to the Tradeoffs podcast, this episode would be a good place to start. It’s a 25-minute look into why so many people think the Medicaid program needs reform.

Tradeoffs Medicaid reform episode

Medicaid is a government program that subsidizes health insurance, medical care, and long-term care for about 80 million people or 19 percent of the population (depending on the measurement). The federal government provides most of the funds by offering to match every dollar states spend with anywhere from one to nine federal dollars. 

Host Dan Gorenstein: “For every dollar states pay for Medicaid, the feds cover something like anywhere from 50 to 90 cents of that dollar.”

Producer Ryan Levi: “Right … And Tom Scully—who ran Medicaid for President George W. Bush—says with the feds picking up such a big part of the tab, states can go wild.”

Tom Scully: “It’s not your money. You’re spending federal tax dollars. So why not expand?”

Little wonder that this year, Medicaid will spend close to $900 billion.

Unlike just about every other discussion of this issue you will find in the media, the Tradeoffs team addresses the most reliable and important study that anyone has ever conducted on Medicaid: the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.

Ryan Levi: “In 2008, Oregon expanded its Medicaid program. And the state used a lottery to decide who was able to join, so researchers could follow the people who got on Medicaid and the people who didn’t to see what the difference was.”

Dan Gorenstein: “Right, and this is a big deal in the research world because this type of study is what’s called a randomized controlled trial, which is considered the most rigorous type of study around.”

Ryan Levi: “Right, and this is so far the only randomized study of Medicaid and its impacts. And the researchers found that people on Medicaid were more likely to get preventive care, less likely to be depressed, less likely to get hit with big medical bills and reported being in better health.… But researchers also found no differences when it came to physical health.”

Josh Archambault: “The Oregon study found that those that were on Medicaid were no different in their health outcomes than if you were uninsured.”

The hosts also include clips from Brian Blase (Paragon Health Institute) and me.

Give it a listen for crucial information about Medicaid that most coverage omits. For recommendations on how Congress should cut Medicaid spending, click here.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
‘Complete failure’: Government shutdown crisis threatens Capitol Hill as Trump plans policy overhaul
next post
Top trade association sends letters calling on big changes in three key departments: ‘Unleash American energy’

You may also like

Libertarians and DOGE Anxiety Disorder

March 28, 2025

Friday Feature: Learn Beyond The Book

June 14, 2024

Intuit v. FTC Brief: Federal Agencies Should Not...

May 6, 2024

Taiwan Takes Step in Right Direction with Longer...

January 26, 2024

Friday Feature: Taking Charge of Your Children’s Education

May 12, 2023

The First Amendment Protects Against Bad‐​Faith Prosecutions

June 8, 2023

The War on Drugs is Also a War...

April 1, 2024

New Defending Globalization Content: Tariffs, Climate Change, and...

April 16, 2024

Friday Feature: City of Fountains

January 3, 2025

126 Parole Orders over 7 Decades: A Historical Review of...

July 17, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Don’t Overlook This Lagging Industry; I Believe It’s Set To Explode!

      July 6, 2025
    • Iran still wants a nuclear weapon despite ‘serious damage’ from US, Israeli strikes: expert warns

      July 6, 2025
    • Democrats project doom and gloom, not celebration, with July 4 messages

      July 5, 2025
    • Xi Jinping’s surprise no-show at BRICS Summit fuels speculation about China’s global standing

      July 5, 2025
    • Tesla sees UK sales rebound in June as EV market accelerates

      July 5, 2025
    • Hived raises $42m to roll out electric delivery fleet across southern England

      July 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,397)
    • Investing (2,102)
    • Politics (15,948)
    • Stocks (3,191)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved