Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”

by January 28, 2025
January 28, 2025
Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”

Neal McCluskey

On January 24, the US Department of Education announced that it was ending “Biden’s book ban hoax” by dismissing eleven active and six pending complaints with the Office of Civil Rights over public schools removing books from library shelves. Complainants alleged that the removals created a hostile environment for students. The department also eliminated the position of “book ban coordinator” created under the Biden administration. This pulls together two big problems in education: federal overreach and culture war.

The Trump administration is doing the correct federalism thing. The Constitution gives the feds no authority to govern education, leaving it to the people and the states. It does have civil rights enforcement power, but clashes of values—affirming children’s identities versus religious convictions, colorblindness versus ameliorating past wrongs—should not be subject to top-down imposition. Values differences need to be navigated by millions of freely acting people, both to maintain liberty and to reach social equilibria.

Of course, public schooling by its nature—government-established and run schools—does not allow people to freely interact. It requires that all pay for public schools governed by states and school boards that do the will of the political majority, or the minority with the most political power. This is a major reason that book battles are a constant presence. Americans are diverse, and public schools force them to engage in political struggles to decide who gets what they think is right and who does not.

Contentious issues are better handled at lower levels of government—state better than federal, local better than state. Smaller units are more likely to reflect the will of specific communities and they prevent bad decisions from being imposed on many people. But as long as there are any dissenters from what a school district decides, especially about deeply personal issues like gender, race, or religion, public schooling treats them unequally under the law.

The solution is school choice: funding following kids to educational options their families choose. Then all can seek what they think is best without imposing on others. At the federal level, Washington should generally stay out of culture war, which the Trump administration has done with book challenges but seems less inclined to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The latter is potentially at least as big a problem as dictating book policies—we will see how it plays out.

In a world where decent people constantly disagree, imposing one answer on everyone is almost always the wrong policy.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Transgender service members and rights groups file suit against Trump’s Pentagon directive
next post
Snowflake and Twilio Stocks are Surging: Here’s What to Do Now!

You may also like

Friday Feature: LUMIN Schools

May 23, 2025

Machines Do Feed Families

October 16, 2024

Friday Feature: Taking Charge of Your Children’s Education

May 12, 2023

David Boaz: A Life Well Lived

June 7, 2024

Where Did Your Tax Dollars Go? A Federal Budget...

April 20, 2023

WSJ Ed Board Knives Fourth Amendment, Betrays Journal’s...

March 26, 2024

The US Labor Market Explains Most of the...

November 16, 2023

Introduction to the New Cato Book Your Body,...

April 8, 2025

Unlikely Senate Alliance Proposes Cryptocurrency Surveillance

July 20, 2023

How Pharmacists Can Increase Access to Routine Health...

March 21, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Week Ahead: NIFTY May Continue Showing Resilience; Broader Markets May Relatively Outperform

      June 15, 2025
    • Netanyahu calls on Iranian citizens to seize ‘opportunity’ for regime change

      June 15, 2025
    • Israel’s actions against Iran create strategic opportunity for US in nuclear talks, experts say

      June 14, 2025
    • Israel strikes at the heart of Iran’s nuclear ambitions in Isfahan offensive

      June 14, 2025
    • Time for Israel to take out ‘head of the snake,’ target members of Iranian regime, says former IDF intel chief

      June 14, 2025
    • HMRC to slash physical post – unless you owe them money

      June 14, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,213)
    • Investing (2,035)
    • Politics (15,651)
    • Stocks (3,148)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved