Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”

by January 28, 2025
January 28, 2025
Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”

Neal McCluskey

On January 24, the US Department of Education announced that it was ending “Biden’s book ban hoax” by dismissing eleven active and six pending complaints with the Office of Civil Rights over public schools removing books from library shelves. Complainants alleged that the removals created a hostile environment for students. The department also eliminated the position of “book ban coordinator” created under the Biden administration. This pulls together two big problems in education: federal overreach and culture war.

The Trump administration is doing the correct federalism thing. The Constitution gives the feds no authority to govern education, leaving it to the people and the states. It does have civil rights enforcement power, but clashes of values—affirming children’s identities versus religious convictions, colorblindness versus ameliorating past wrongs—should not be subject to top-down imposition. Values differences need to be navigated by millions of freely acting people, both to maintain liberty and to reach social equilibria.

Of course, public schooling by its nature—government-established and run schools—does not allow people to freely interact. It requires that all pay for public schools governed by states and school boards that do the will of the political majority, or the minority with the most political power. This is a major reason that book battles are a constant presence. Americans are diverse, and public schools force them to engage in political struggles to decide who gets what they think is right and who does not.

Contentious issues are better handled at lower levels of government—state better than federal, local better than state. Smaller units are more likely to reflect the will of specific communities and they prevent bad decisions from being imposed on many people. But as long as there are any dissenters from what a school district decides, especially about deeply personal issues like gender, race, or religion, public schooling treats them unequally under the law.

The solution is school choice: funding following kids to educational options their families choose. Then all can seek what they think is best without imposing on others. At the federal level, Washington should generally stay out of culture war, which the Trump administration has done with book challenges but seems less inclined to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The latter is potentially at least as big a problem as dictating book policies—we will see how it plays out.

In a world where decent people constantly disagree, imposing one answer on everyone is almost always the wrong policy.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Transgender service members and rights groups file suit against Trump’s Pentagon directive
next post
Snowflake and Twilio Stocks are Surging: Here’s What to Do Now!

You may also like

More Senators Target Financial Privacy with “CANSEE Act”

July 25, 2023

Governor Newsom Claims Florida Has More Per Capita...

December 1, 2023

Expensing Could Help Manufacturing’s Productivity Problem

June 12, 2024

International Students Benefit the United States

April 11, 2025

Wall Street Journal Columnist Triggers a ‘Reefer Madness’...

January 31, 2024

Sanders and Hawley Are Wrong on Rate Caps

February 18, 2025

Solar Panels, Open Lands, and Federalism

November 6, 2024

Meta Oversight Board’s Mixed Bag of Decisions

April 28, 2025

Trump’s Tariffs Undermine His Tax Cuts

June 27, 2024

Friday Feature: Bright Minds STEAM Studio

February 28, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump unleashes US nuclear renaissance with bold executive orders

      May 24, 2025
    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Stays In Technically Challanging Situation; Sector Rotation Shows Likely Change In Leadership

      May 24, 2025
    • Trump admin steps up overhaul of National Security Council, weeks after Waltz’s departure

      May 24, 2025
    • Leadership Development: Unlocking the Inner Leader

      May 24, 2025
    • Satellite images reveal North Korea’s mangled naval destroyer after failed launch

      May 24, 2025
    • 3 Stocks to Watch While Everyone’s Staring at NVIDIA

      May 24, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,037)
    • Investing (1,986)
    • Politics (15,363)
    • Stocks (3,106)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved