Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”

by January 28, 2025
January 28, 2025
Public Schooling, Trump, and the “Book Ban Hoax”

Neal McCluskey

On January 24, the US Department of Education announced that it was ending “Biden’s book ban hoax” by dismissing eleven active and six pending complaints with the Office of Civil Rights over public schools removing books from library shelves. Complainants alleged that the removals created a hostile environment for students. The department also eliminated the position of “book ban coordinator” created under the Biden administration. This pulls together two big problems in education: federal overreach and culture war.

The Trump administration is doing the correct federalism thing. The Constitution gives the feds no authority to govern education, leaving it to the people and the states. It does have civil rights enforcement power, but clashes of values—affirming children’s identities versus religious convictions, colorblindness versus ameliorating past wrongs—should not be subject to top-down imposition. Values differences need to be navigated by millions of freely acting people, both to maintain liberty and to reach social equilibria.

Of course, public schooling by its nature—government-established and run schools—does not allow people to freely interact. It requires that all pay for public schools governed by states and school boards that do the will of the political majority, or the minority with the most political power. This is a major reason that book battles are a constant presence. Americans are diverse, and public schools force them to engage in political struggles to decide who gets what they think is right and who does not.

Contentious issues are better handled at lower levels of government—state better than federal, local better than state. Smaller units are more likely to reflect the will of specific communities and they prevent bad decisions from being imposed on many people. But as long as there are any dissenters from what a school district decides, especially about deeply personal issues like gender, race, or religion, public schooling treats them unequally under the law.

The solution is school choice: funding following kids to educational options their families choose. Then all can seek what they think is best without imposing on others. At the federal level, Washington should generally stay out of culture war, which the Trump administration has done with book challenges but seems less inclined to do with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The latter is potentially at least as big a problem as dictating book policies—we will see how it plays out.

In a world where decent people constantly disagree, imposing one answer on everyone is almost always the wrong policy.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Transgender service members and rights groups file suit against Trump’s Pentagon directive
next post
Snowflake and Twilio Stocks are Surging: Here’s What to Do Now!

You may also like

My Year’s Worth (or Two) of Election Law...

January 22, 2024

ProPublica Profiles Army Corps Failures

November 17, 2023

Is Nuclear Power’s High Cost Justified for Clean...

November 5, 2024

New Ships Offer a Case Study in Protectionist...

October 11, 2024

Shedding Light on the Incidence of Illegal Noncitizen...

May 23, 2024

The Republican Study Committee Budget on the Key...

June 16, 2023

Reasons to Feel Thankful in 2024

November 28, 2024

Social Security at 89: Time to Retire the...

August 14, 2024

Defense and Veterans Spending Tops $1.2 Trillion

February 5, 2025

Senator Lee’s New and Improved Biosimilar Red Tape...

July 14, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • DAVID MARCUS: Zany Zohran endorsement is existential choice for Hakeem Jeffries

      July 26, 2025
    • FTC firings take spotlight in Trump’s fight to erase independence of agencies

      July 26, 2025
    • DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified Trump-Russia docs: Here’s what they say

      July 26, 2025
    • Trump signs rescissions package, closes out week with trip to Scotland

      July 26, 2025
    • CHARLIE KIRK: Republicans must seize Gen Z moment or risk losing an entire generation

      July 26, 2025
    • Technology in Hospitality: Innovations Shaping Guest Experiences

      July 26, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,580)
    • Investing (2,151)
    • Politics (16,208)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved