Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

How Trump, AG Bondi can persuade Democrats to abandon lawfare

by January 30, 2025
January 30, 2025
How Trump, AG Bondi can persuade Democrats to abandon lawfare
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

On President Donald Trump’s first day back in office, he signed an executive order entitled ‘Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government,’ responding to the Biden administration’s lawfare against him. Democrats still harshly criticize that E.O.

On Nov. 15, 2022, former President Donald Trump announced that he again was running for president. On Nov. 18, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith as special counsel to investigate and prosecute Trump, a historical first because prosecuting a former president and the leading presidential candidate of the major opposition political party shattered two centuries of legal norms and tradition. 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, recently said that Biden’s ‘Justice Department’s infected with political decision-making, while its leaders refuse to acknowledge that reality.’

Trump consistently and correctly criticized the Biden administration’s politicization and weaponization of government. He must now fundamentally choose whether to allow the Democrats’ wrongful lawfare against him to naturally end.

Unfortunately, the Biden administration’s last-minute machinations, such as politicized special counsel reports and Biden’s blanket pardons for his family, friends and political allies, signal that Democrats likely will not stop lawfare and weaponization until they are turned against them. 

Biden’s statement accompanying his pardons showed that he knew lawfare was wrong: ‘baseless and politically motivated investigations wreak havoc on the lives, safety and financial security of targeted individuals and their families… being investigated or prosecuted can irreparably damage their reputations and finances.’

If Democrats disavowed lawfare and committed to never doing it again, Biden’s last-minute pardons would have been unnecessary. Instead, they indicate that Democrats still want lawfare, expect tit-for-tat Republican-led investigations of Democrats, and anticipate that Trump perhaps will pardon his family, appointees and political supporters when he leaves office.

Democrats recently signaled their commitment to lawfare when they attacked Pam Bondi during her confirmation hearings about ‘future weaponization’ at DOJ. They intend to do the same at Kash Patel’s upcoming hearings for FBI director. 

Their questions followed Special Counsel Jack Smith’s pointless report, where he inaptly claimed that he would have convicted Trump for J6 but for the 2024 election. Smith is wrong because he ignored the Supreme Court’s Trump immunity case and cases such as Fischer, McDonnell, and Yates, all of which stripped away the heart of Smith’s charges. Ironically, Smith was the lead prosecutor in McDonnell; the Supreme Court ruled against him, 9-0.

Furthermore, Smith’s report futilely cited the Trump dissenting opinions and the lower courts’ denials of presidential immunity, even though the Supreme Court rejected them; this reveals Smith’s bias and poor legal judgment. 

Smith’s report implied that the Supreme Court was wrong: ‘no court had ever found that presidents are immune from criminal responsibility for their official acts, and no text in the Constitution explicitly confers such criminal immunity on the President.’ The Supreme Court, however, never before had to rule on presidential immunity because no DOJ ever prosecuted a former president.

Perhaps Smith takes comfort from legacy media outlets which supported him. For example, The Washington Post noted that Smith’s report ‘seems to make a point to offer a subtle but pretty unmistakable rebuke of the Supreme Court and its role in sparing Trump a possible conviction.’  Smith’s duty as a special counsel, however, is to obey the Supreme Court, not ignore or ‘rebuke’ it.

Customarily, special counsel reports are dry, boring, factual documents.  Smith filled his with politically tinged allegations that he cribbed from his indictments and the congressional J6 committee. 

He so strenuously claimed that he and his office were ‘unbiased,’ ‘neutral,’ and ‘professional’ such that he ‘doth protest too much, methinks’ as per Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet,’ Act 3, Scene 2. No previous special counsel felt the need to repeatedly declare his own fairness and disinterest; none ever prosecuted a former president and the leading candidate of the main opposition party.

Worse, Smith dropped an ‘October Surprise’ when he filed a huge J6 court brief shortly before Election Day, one-sidedly reciting unflattering allegations against Trump. It wrongly claimed, among other things, that Trump directed ‘an angry mob to the United States Capitol to obstruct the congressional certification of the presidential election and then leverage rioters’ violence to further delay it’ and that Trump ‘resorted to crimes.’

Smith violated DOJ’s internal rules, which state that federal prosecutors ‘may never select the timing of any action, including investigative steps, criminal charges, or statements, for the purpose of affecting any election or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.’ 

It appears that Pam Bondi will be confirmed as attorney general. She and President Trump can right our DOJ and criminal justice system, but only if the Democrats admit that their lawfare and weaponizing the government were wrong and backfired on them. 

Sadly, it may be that Democrats have to be shown that investigations and prosecutions can descend on them just as easily as they did on Republicans in order to drive a stake into lawfare’s heart.

The views expressed in this article are the writers’ own.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump’s foreign policy: What to expect from MAGA 2.0
next post
‘Dems look unhinged’: Conservatives rally around RFK Jr’s ‘masterclass’ confirmation hearing performance

You may also like

Key House projection spells trouble for two Republican...

November 1, 2024

2024 GOP candidate faced wrath of Romney after...

October 24, 2023

How Trump, or Kamala, could win, as all...

September 5, 2024

Left-Wing Late Night Hosts Floundering – Gutfeld Dominates...

October 11, 2022

House, Senate GOP leaders urge SCOTUS to halt...

January 19, 2024

US Household Wealth Sees Second-Fastest Decline in US...

December 12, 2022

A-Rod spotted near Trump Tower as crowds await...

April 4, 2023

Donald Trump Jr. wants a ‘fighter’ to serve...

March 25, 2024

Ex-Venezuelan Soldiers Located Homeless on the Streets of...

September 27, 2022

Biden insists ‘I made the decisions’ as Republicans...

June 5, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Barclays exits Entercard joint venture with £200m sale to Swedbank

      August 28, 2025
    • Is Trump considering bold Africa play to push back on China, Russia and Islamic terrorists?

      August 28, 2025
    • ‘Gender bonus bias’ revealed as men nearly 1.5 times more likely to receive bonuses than women

      August 28, 2025
    • Four in five online small businesses expect growth despite UK economic headwinds

      August 28, 2025
    • Tesla sales slump 42% in Europe as BYD overtakes market share

      August 28, 2025
    • “XRP Futures Hit $1B — WinnerMining Cloud Mining Shows You How to Earn $1,850 a Day”

      August 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,908)
    • Investing (2,246)
    • Politics (16,504)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved