Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The Right to Hug Your Kids

by January 30, 2025
January 30, 2025
The Right to Hug Your Kids

Clark Neily

Among the most challenging and important questions in constitutional law is whether the constitutions of the United States and various individual states protect unenumerated rights—and if so, which rights. The Supreme Court has long held that the US Constitution does protect certain rights not explicitly set forth in the text, including the right to guide the upbringing of one’s children.

At issue in M.M. v. King is a policy of certain county jails in Michigan prohibiting in-person visits and forcing pretrial detainees and others to instead interact with their families, friends, and other loved ones exclusively through video conferencing and telephone calls. As a result, presumptively innocent arrestees who are detained pretrial have been prevented from seeing and hugging their own children for weeks, months, or even longer—and for no bona fide penological reason.

A state trial court dismissed a challenge to this no-contact, no in-person visitation policy, finding that the Michigan Constitution does not protect a right to family integrity or specifically for incarcerated parents—including ones who are being held pretrial and are therefore presumed innocent—to hug their own children.

On appeal, Cato joined an amicus brief with more than a dozen other organizations and individuals, including the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Children’s Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, arguing that incarcerated parents have a right to in-person visits with their children. Besides the constitutional argument, the brief summarizes extensive social-science data showing that in-person visits (a) mitigate the harm of incarceration to children as well as parents; (b) aid in the peaceful administration of jails by reducing prisoner misconduct and aggressive behavior; and (c) facilitate reentry into society by helping maintain potentially stabilizing family ties.

It is hardly surprising that neither the US Constitution nor any state constitution explicitly protects the right of a parent to hug their own children because the idea that the government would gratuitously interfere with such a basic expression of love and affection is almost incomprehensibly dystopian. But the mere fact that a given right is not expressly set forth in a constitution does not mean there is no such right, nor does it relieve the judiciary of its obligation to protect that right from infringement by the government.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
President Trump’s foreign policy playbook has our friends and foes equally rattled
next post
Why Do Illegal Immigrants Have a Low Crime Rate? 12 Possible Explanations

You may also like

Large-Scale Food Stamp Fraud

May 30, 2025

Should Governments Encourage Population Growth?

August 19, 2024

How Elimination of ‘Junk’ Cable Fees Can Reduce...

November 30, 2023

Full Expensing Is a Key Piece of the Republican...

June 7, 2023

Don’t Move the Swamp, Cut It!

January 28, 2025

The Pernicious Expansion of “Public Health”

June 26, 2024

Cato Forum Probes Farm Subsidies

October 3, 2023

Cato Report: Zero Chance of Being Killed by...

August 28, 2023

White House Extends Ukraine’s Steel Tariff Exemption; Sad...

June 5, 2023

ICE Is Releasing Fewer Criminals Than Under Trump

April 12, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Homeless people can be removed from streets by cities, states in new Trump executive order

      July 24, 2025
    • US pulls team from ceasefire talks in Qatar after Israel does the same, claiming Hamas is acting in bad faith

      July 24, 2025
    • US and Israel urgently need to replenish weapons stockpiles after 12-day war, defense analysts warn

      July 24, 2025
    • Ron Klain dodges reporters after marathon grilling in Biden cover-up probe

      July 24, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Newly declassified documents destroy Russian collusion hoax

      July 24, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      July 24, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,568)
    • Investing (2,145)
    • Politics (16,192)
    • Stocks (3,227)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved