Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

by January 31, 2025
January 31, 2025
Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

Jeffrey Miron

In September 2024, the Biden administration implemented a 100 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), citing concerns over China’s subsidies of its EV industry. These subsidies, the administration claimed, allowed Chinese manufacturers to sell vehicles at artificially low prices, putting US automakers at a disadvantage.

This example illustrates a common justification for tariffs: that other countries engage in “unfair” trade practices, such as subsidizing their manufacturing firms. This claim is likely overstated; in many cases the costs of production are lower in poorer countries because labor costs are lower, even adjusting for skill levels.

But some countries do subsidize particular industries, which allows them to sell at lower prices relative to US producers. India provides favorable loans and tax breaks to its sugar industry, while the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy offers direct payments and market interventions to its farmers.

Is that a good reason for the US to impose tariffs on these countries?

No. Subsidies for particular industries harm the countries that adopt them by distorting the allocation of productive activity and forcing residents to pay higher taxes. But such policies benefit the United States overall: while some workers see less demand for their services, the US purchasers of the subsidized products face lower prices, and this stimulates demand, allowing for job creation instead of loss.

Historical evidence supports this: in the five years following the passage of NAFTA, which eliminated most tariffs and trade barriers between the United States, Mexico, and Canada, the unemployment rate fell to below 4 percent while the number of manufacturing jobs increased by half a million. Likewise, estimates from the International Trade Commission and the Peterson Institute suggest a modest positive impact on the labor market and the economy more broadly from the agreement.

If other countries want to “throw money out the window,” the US should stand under that window.

This article appeared on Substack on January 31, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Journavx: A Promising Opioid Alternative, but Not a Silver Bullet
next post
After stinging election defeats, DNC eyes rural voters as key to 2026 midterm success

You may also like

SCOTUS: If You’re Jailed on a False Charge,...

June 20, 2024

Answering Frequently Asked Questions about the Inflation Reduction...

March 18, 2025

The Pernicious Expansion of “Public Health”

June 26, 2024

New Defending Globalization Content: Resource Abundance and Gaming

May 14, 2024

Trump’s 100-Day Health Scorecard: Mixed Signals and Missed...

April 30, 2025

Affirmative Action in College Admissions

May 30, 2023

Fitch Downgrades U.S. Debt

August 2, 2023

A Jeffersonian Dinner on the Future of Social...

May 31, 2024

Has the Overdose Death Rate Peaked? Insights from...

November 19, 2024

It’s Tax Season—Five Charts on Who Pays and...

April 11, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Business Settings that Need Rolling Shutters

      May 15, 2025
    • What’s Driving the Drop in Overdose Deaths?

      May 15, 2025
    • The real breakthrough in U.S.–China trade talks is much bigger than just tariffs

      May 15, 2025
    • Dem senator says ‘no doubt’ Biden declined cognitively during presidency

      May 15, 2025
    • Trump makes historic UAE visit as first US president in nearly 30 years

      May 15, 2025
    • GOP reps, advocacy group to target competitive House districts in Trump tax-cut push

      May 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (7,967)
    • Investing (1,960)
    • Politics (15,230)
    • Stocks (3,084)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved