Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

by January 31, 2025
January 31, 2025
Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

Jeffrey Miron

In September 2024, the Biden administration implemented a 100 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), citing concerns over China’s subsidies of its EV industry. These subsidies, the administration claimed, allowed Chinese manufacturers to sell vehicles at artificially low prices, putting US automakers at a disadvantage.

This example illustrates a common justification for tariffs: that other countries engage in “unfair” trade practices, such as subsidizing their manufacturing firms. This claim is likely overstated; in many cases the costs of production are lower in poorer countries because labor costs are lower, even adjusting for skill levels.

But some countries do subsidize particular industries, which allows them to sell at lower prices relative to US producers. India provides favorable loans and tax breaks to its sugar industry, while the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy offers direct payments and market interventions to its farmers.

Is that a good reason for the US to impose tariffs on these countries?

No. Subsidies for particular industries harm the countries that adopt them by distorting the allocation of productive activity and forcing residents to pay higher taxes. But such policies benefit the United States overall: while some workers see less demand for their services, the US purchasers of the subsidized products face lower prices, and this stimulates demand, allowing for job creation instead of loss.

Historical evidence supports this: in the five years following the passage of NAFTA, which eliminated most tariffs and trade barriers between the United States, Mexico, and Canada, the unemployment rate fell to below 4 percent while the number of manufacturing jobs increased by half a million. Likewise, estimates from the International Trade Commission and the Peterson Institute suggest a modest positive impact on the labor market and the economy more broadly from the agreement.

If other countries want to “throw money out the window,” the US should stand under that window.

This article appeared on Substack on January 31, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Journavx: A Promising Opioid Alternative, but Not a Silver Bullet
next post
After stinging election defeats, DNC eyes rural voters as key to 2026 midterm success

You may also like

An Encouraging Report on Overdose Deaths

September 18, 2024

Feds Should Leave Campus Unrest to Others

May 3, 2024

Navigating the Ma(i)ze of Mexico’s GM Corn Ban

October 22, 2023

Celebrating Charles Koch’s Legacy of Liberty

March 28, 2025

A “Bidenomics” Cautionary Tale

July 7, 2023

Trade in Barbieland!

September 21, 2023

Friday Feature: Redeemer Classical School

March 21, 2025

Defund the (Diversity) Police

December 7, 2023

House Bill Calls for an End to Government...

June 11, 2024

Q&A with House Budget Committee Members

December 19, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Blue state Republicans threaten rebellion if Senate changes key provision in Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Ricketts, Fetterman team up for crackdown on China’s attempts to purchase US farmland

      June 5, 2025
    • Hamas working to ‘sabotage’ Trump-backed aid group with ‘fake news’: Israeli official

      June 5, 2025
    • Longtime Trump loyalist flips on GOP’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Supreme Court rules Wisconsin unconstitutionally discriminated against Christian charity

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump touts ‘very positive’ breakthrough with Xi after slamming China for trade violation

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,529)
    • Stocks (3,128)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved