Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

by January 31, 2025
January 31, 2025
Should the US Respond to “Unfair” Trade Practices?

Jeffrey Miron

In September 2024, the Biden administration implemented a 100 percent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), citing concerns over China’s subsidies of its EV industry. These subsidies, the administration claimed, allowed Chinese manufacturers to sell vehicles at artificially low prices, putting US automakers at a disadvantage.

This example illustrates a common justification for tariffs: that other countries engage in “unfair” trade practices, such as subsidizing their manufacturing firms. This claim is likely overstated; in many cases the costs of production are lower in poorer countries because labor costs are lower, even adjusting for skill levels.

But some countries do subsidize particular industries, which allows them to sell at lower prices relative to US producers. India provides favorable loans and tax breaks to its sugar industry, while the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy offers direct payments and market interventions to its farmers.

Is that a good reason for the US to impose tariffs on these countries?

No. Subsidies for particular industries harm the countries that adopt them by distorting the allocation of productive activity and forcing residents to pay higher taxes. But such policies benefit the United States overall: while some workers see less demand for their services, the US purchasers of the subsidized products face lower prices, and this stimulates demand, allowing for job creation instead of loss.

Historical evidence supports this: in the five years following the passage of NAFTA, which eliminated most tariffs and trade barriers between the United States, Mexico, and Canada, the unemployment rate fell to below 4 percent while the number of manufacturing jobs increased by half a million. Likewise, estimates from the International Trade Commission and the Peterson Institute suggest a modest positive impact on the labor market and the economy more broadly from the agreement.

If other countries want to “throw money out the window,” the US should stand under that window.

This article appeared on Substack on January 31, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Journavx: A Promising Opioid Alternative, but Not a Silver Bullet
next post
After stinging election defeats, DNC eyes rural voters as key to 2026 midterm success

You may also like

That’s Not How the BRAC Commission Worked: No...

November 28, 2023

The Government Can’t Target TikTok Because of the...

June 28, 2024

Don’t Conflate US and Israeli Border Security Challenges

October 18, 2023

For National Recovery Month, Congress Should Expand Access...

September 7, 2023

Pharmaceutical Pricing Around the World

May 14, 2025

A Small Step Toward Ending Jawboning, a Big...

June 26, 2024

Learning from the Caribbean CBDC Experience

July 24, 2025

Lesh v. United States Brief: The Supreme Court...

January 7, 2025

How to Tackle Debanking on Day One and...

December 4, 2024

Two Great First Amendment Decisions by Judge Willett...

January 22, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • What James Carville doesn’t get about voter priorities

      July 25, 2025
    • Fields of fortune: Why farmland remains a tax-efficient safe haven — for now

      July 25, 2025
    • UK firms cutting staff at fastest pace since February as economic pressures mount

      July 25, 2025
    • River Island faces collapse unless landlords approve urgent rescue plan

      July 25, 2025
    • LVMH suffers steep drop in fashion sales as wealthy consumers tighten belts

      July 25, 2025
    • EU fails to reduce 50% steel tariff in draft US trade deal as industry warns of ‘catastrophic’ impact

      July 25, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,573)
    • Investing (2,145)
    • Politics (16,193)
    • Stocks (3,227)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved