Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

FBI, DOJ strike agreement in lawsuit over January 6 agent list amid fears of retaliation

by February 7, 2025
February 7, 2025

The Justice Department and a group of FBI agents reached an agreement in federal court Friday over the dissemination of information about FBI agents involved in the Jan. 6 investigation.

According to the text of the deal, the Trump administration cannot release information about the FBI agents who investigated the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot without giving plaintiffs at least two days’ notice so that the matter can be considered again in federal court.

It does not, however, place such a time limit on the dissemination of agents’ identities to other government agencies or the White House. 

The deal resolves, at least for now, a dispute over the release of information that agents said they feared could be used for retaliation or leaked to the public.

 

The agreement comes after active FBI agents and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents Association, a voluntary agents’ group, sued the Justice Department earlier this week seeking to block the release of any identifying information about FBI agents involved in the January 6 investigations.

The two parties tussled for hours in court on Thursday in front of U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, who questioned both parties at length on the nature of DOJ’s questionnaire, the potential for disclosures or retaliation and how the Justice Department intends to use information divulged in the questionnaires.

The agreement defers any immediate relief for plaintiffs, pushing to March 27 their hearing for a preliminary injunction. 

Cobb previously granted the two parties a brief administrative stay on Thursday evening, saying that if the information was released she believed it ‘would put FBI agents in immediate danger.’

The agreement comes just days after FBI leadership said it had provided the Justice Department with a list of agents who worked on Jan. 6 investigations and criminal cases, in keeping with an earlier deadline set by U.S. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove.

‘Plaintiffs assert that the purpose for this list is to identify agents to be terminated or to suffer other adverse employment action,’ lawyers for the FBI agents said, adding that they ‘reasonably fear that all or parts of this list might be published by allies of President Trump, thus placing themselves and their families in immediate danger of retribution by the now pardoned and at-large Jan. 6 convicted felons.’

Lawyers for the agents argued that any effort to review or discriminate against agents involved in the investigation would be ‘unlawful and retaliatory,’ and a violation of civil service protections under federal law.

They also cited ‘profound concern’ that the list of thousands of FBI agents involved would be leaked to the public, threatening their safety. 

Meanwhile, lawyers for the Justice Department stressed that their intent in issuing the questionnaire was to conduct an ‘internal review’ of activities in the Jan. 6 probe, not to punish individuals for carrying out orders. 

Bove also sought to emphasize this message in an all-staff email to FBI personnel earlier this week. In the email, Bove stressed that the questionnaire was not intended to be a first step to mass layoffs, and stressed it was simply intended for review.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Deadline looms for release of JFK assassination files
next post
Trump plans to meet with Zelenskyy as he looks to end Ukraine war

You may also like

Fake ‘Meat’ Sales Down Sharply – High Prices...

September 26, 2022

Trump recommends North Carolina GOP Chair Whatley to...

February 8, 2024

RNC confirms 8 candidates to participate in first...

August 22, 2023

Americans believe US should focus more on domestic...

June 17, 2024

Sinema, Manchin rebuke Biden admin’s attack on school...

August 3, 2023

The history of Gaza amid Trump’s plan to...

February 5, 2025

Hegseth says he’s undoing ‘social justice/Biden initiative’ that...

April 29, 2025

Creepy Planned Parenthood Sex Ed Director Claims Babies...

December 4, 2022

Electoral Count Act reforms included within Biden’s $1.7...

December 20, 2022

Jordan says Hunter Biden made a ‘huge change’...

December 14, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • State Department confirms ‘constructive’ nuclear talks with Iran; Trump says deal ‘sort of’ agreed to

      May 15, 2025
    • GOP rebel mutiny threatens to derail Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ before key committee hurdle

      May 15, 2025
    • What Sector Rotation Says About the Market Cycle Right Now

      May 15, 2025
    • US Withdrawal from the World Trade Organization Would Be an Epic Mistake

      May 15, 2025
    • Rubio doubts ‘anything productive’ will happen in Ukraine peace talks without Trump, Putin

      May 15, 2025
    • Far-left congresswoman revives ousted ‘Squad’ Dem’s reparations push for Black Americans: ‘We are awake’

      May 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (7,968)
    • Investing (1,964)
    • Politics (15,239)
    • Stocks (3,085)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved