Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

FBI, DOJ strike agreement in lawsuit over January 6 agent list amid fears of retaliation

by February 7, 2025
February 7, 2025

The Justice Department and a group of FBI agents reached an agreement in federal court Friday over the dissemination of information about FBI agents involved in the Jan. 6 investigation.

According to the text of the deal, the Trump administration cannot release information about the FBI agents who investigated the January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot without giving plaintiffs at least two days’ notice so that the matter can be considered again in federal court.

It does not, however, place such a time limit on the dissemination of agents’ identities to other government agencies or the White House. 

The deal resolves, at least for now, a dispute over the release of information that agents said they feared could be used for retaliation or leaked to the public.

 

The agreement comes after active FBI agents and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents Association, a voluntary agents’ group, sued the Justice Department earlier this week seeking to block the release of any identifying information about FBI agents involved in the January 6 investigations.

The two parties tussled for hours in court on Thursday in front of U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, who questioned both parties at length on the nature of DOJ’s questionnaire, the potential for disclosures or retaliation and how the Justice Department intends to use information divulged in the questionnaires.

The agreement defers any immediate relief for plaintiffs, pushing to March 27 their hearing for a preliminary injunction. 

Cobb previously granted the two parties a brief administrative stay on Thursday evening, saying that if the information was released she believed it ‘would put FBI agents in immediate danger.’

The agreement comes just days after FBI leadership said it had provided the Justice Department with a list of agents who worked on Jan. 6 investigations and criminal cases, in keeping with an earlier deadline set by U.S. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove.

‘Plaintiffs assert that the purpose for this list is to identify agents to be terminated or to suffer other adverse employment action,’ lawyers for the FBI agents said, adding that they ‘reasonably fear that all or parts of this list might be published by allies of President Trump, thus placing themselves and their families in immediate danger of retribution by the now pardoned and at-large Jan. 6 convicted felons.’

Lawyers for the agents argued that any effort to review or discriminate against agents involved in the investigation would be ‘unlawful and retaliatory,’ and a violation of civil service protections under federal law.

They also cited ‘profound concern’ that the list of thousands of FBI agents involved would be leaked to the public, threatening their safety. 

Meanwhile, lawyers for the Justice Department stressed that their intent in issuing the questionnaire was to conduct an ‘internal review’ of activities in the Jan. 6 probe, not to punish individuals for carrying out orders. 

Bove also sought to emphasize this message in an all-staff email to FBI personnel earlier this week. In the email, Bove stressed that the questionnaire was not intended to be a first step to mass layoffs, and stressed it was simply intended for review.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Deadline looms for release of JFK assassination files
next post
Trump plans to meet with Zelenskyy as he looks to end Ukraine war

You may also like

‘Children are being trafficked’: Speaker McCarthy warns how...

July 30, 2023

Border Patrol union rips Biden’s border visit, says...

January 8, 2023

FLASHBACK: Top Harris campaign aide was key voice...

August 27, 2024

Biden admin should look at Abraham Accords-type initiative...

November 28, 2023

Trump’s DOJ to tackle ‘barbaric Hamas terrorists’ with...

March 18, 2025

US scrambles as drones shape the landscape of...

November 23, 2024

Feinstein’s future ‘in her own hands’ amid extended...

April 24, 2023

Retired rear admiral praises Secret Service’s cocaine investigation...

July 17, 2023

Trump to meet with American ballerina freed from...

May 5, 2025

Ted Cruz rips Buttigieg at CPAC: ‘What the...

March 3, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Wimbledon winners face £1m UK tax bills despite non-resident status

      July 15, 2025
    • ‘Game changer’: Bipartisan senators gunning for Russia sanctions ready to give Trump runway

      July 15, 2025
    • Constitutional scholar uses Biden autopen to flip Dems’ ‘democracy’ script against them: ‘Scandal’

      July 15, 2025
    • The Radiology Group Atlanta: Helping Small Hospitals Stay Open with Smart Imaging Support

      July 15, 2025
    • Senate GOP braces for test vote on Trump’s $9.4B clawback package

      July 15, 2025
    • Anthony Bernal: Who is Jill Biden’s top aide ordered to testify about alleged cover-up?

      July 15, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,485)
    • Investing (2,121)
    • Politics (16,047)
    • Stocks (3,209)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved