Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Will Trump’s “Reciprocal Trade” Only Go One Way?

by February 7, 2025
February 7, 2025
Will Trump’s “Reciprocal Trade” Only Go One Way?

Scott Lincicome

On February 7, President Donald Trump announced his intention to unveil a “reciprocal tariff” system sometime next week, so that the United States is “treated evenly with other countries.” Trump didn’t provide details of how such a system would work. But it appears he wants US tariffs on countries’ imports to match their tariffs on US exports: “They charge us. We charge them. It’s the same thing.”

Such a system raises a host of legal, economic, and practical concerns, but, being a Friday afternoon and all, I just have two basic questions for now: 

First, does this mean that the US government will reduce tariffs on imports from the many countries that have lower tariffs than we have?  As Figures 1 and 2 show for trade in manufactured goods and other non-agricultural goods, the United States does not have the lowest tariffs in the world and instead ranks somewhere in the middle among wealthy, industrialized countries. (Tellingly, only really poor countries have very high tariffs, but that’s a discussion for another time.) Should Trump’s system be based on average tariff rates, then “true” reciprocity would require US tariff rate reductions on goods from dozens of countries. 

As seen in Table 1, moreover, a country-to-county comparison would raise similar questions. There, we see that tariffs applied on US non-agricultural exports by the United States’ top export markets are about the same—sometimes a little higher, but also sometimes a little lower (see bold/​italic numbers)—as those applied by the United States on the same goods from the same places.

By this metric, a new reciprocal system means reduced US tariffs on manufactured goods from Europe, Mexico, Canada, or the UK, where, depending on how you measure the average, tariffs are actually lower than what the United States applies.

Second, will there be reciprocity for the other protectionism?  As I wrote a few months ago:

…Washington uses many “non-tariff” measures to impede foreign competition. This includes subsidies, quotas, “Buy American” restrictions, the Jones Act (drink!), and regulatory protectionism like the FDA’s blockade on baby formula. We’re also one of the biggest users of “trade remedy” measures (anti-dumping, especially) and today apply more than 700 special duties on mainly manufactured goods like steel and chemicals.

Indeed, according to the independent Global Trade Alert, which monitors nations’ trade liberalization and protectionist policies, the United States has had the most “harmful” trade interventions—tariffs, non-tariff barriers, subsidies, etc.—of any nation since late 2008. 

One can reasonably quibble with the organization’s methodology, but that wouldn’t change the basic point: many foreign nations do have protectionist barriers against American goods, services, and investment, but the United States is no saint here either. Instead, all countries’ trade policies have their political sacred cows (sometimes literally targeting cows!), and some countries are surely better than others. But the idea that the United States must adopt “reciprocity”—and in the process become a tariff-wielding protectionist outlier—because of some grave historical trade injustice is just detached from reality.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
CDC staff told to remove terms like ‘non-binary,’ ‘they/them,’ ‘pregnant people’ from public health material
next post
Top federal agency with history of wasteful spending could be next DOGE target

You may also like

New Zealand Does About-Face on Plans To Impose...

November 28, 2023

The Untested Assumptions in SEC Chair Gensler’s Pivot...

July 31, 2023

Breaking Down Taiwan’s Arms Backlog, Part 1: Overview...

November 6, 2023

California Forever Project Must Overcome Land-Use Restrictions

September 7, 2023

Withdrawing from the WHO: A Chance to Rethink...

January 22, 2025

Defense Spending Can and Should Be Cut

May 21, 2024

Research Shows Taxes Matter for Investment and Growth

November 9, 2023

ADA Lawsuit Mills Reach the Supreme Court

October 4, 2023

Diamond, Dybvig, and Government Deposit Insurance

November 25, 2022

Biden Administration Proposes Tightening Protectionist Buy American Act

November 6, 2024

New Zealand Does About-Face on Plans To Impose...

November 28, 2023

The Untested Assumptions in SEC Chair Gensler’s Pivot...

July 31, 2023

Breaking Down Taiwan’s Arms Backlog, Part 1: Overview...

November 6, 2023

California Forever Project Must Overcome Land-Use Restrictions

September 7, 2023

Withdrawing from the WHO: A Chance to Rethink...

January 22, 2025

Defense Spending Can and Should Be Cut

May 21, 2024

Research Shows Taxes Matter for Investment and Growth

November 9, 2023

ADA Lawsuit Mills Reach the Supreme Court

October 4, 2023

Diamond, Dybvig, and Government Deposit Insurance

November 25, 2022

Biden Administration Proposes Tightening Protectionist Buy American Act

November 6, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Haitian Immigrants Have a Low Incarceration Rate

      July 7, 2025
    • Sen. Steve Daines says regime change is the best long-term plan in Iran

      July 7, 2025
    • Biden aides pushed for early debate to show off Biden’s ‘strength,’ expose Trump’s ‘weakness,’ book says

      July 7, 2025
    • US champions Lebanon’s response to Hezbollah disarmament, hints at Abraham Accords opportunity

      July 7, 2025
    • Liberal critics question why architect of failed Biden foreign policy is advising ‘Project 2029’

      July 7, 2025
    • Trump’s Vietnam Agreement Bodes Poorly for Future Trade Deals

      July 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,409)
    • Investing (2,105)
    • Politics (15,954)
    • Stocks (3,192)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved