Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

‘What a ripoff!’: Trump sparks backlash after cutting billions in overhead costs from NIH research grants

by February 10, 2025
February 10, 2025

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced it would be cutting billions in overhead costs associated with federally funded research grants that go to various institutions, as part of a wider move by the Trump administration to slash wasteful spending.

The agency’s announcement unveiling the directive indicated that in fiscal year 2023, the NIH spent around $35 billion across roughly 50,000 grants that go to research institutions, such as universities and hospitals. Of that $35 billion, according to the announcement, $9 billion was allocated for ‘indirect costs’ that cover expenses related to depreciation on buildings, equipment, capital improvements, interest on debt associated with certain buildings, and operations and maintenance expenses.

When a grant is awarded, an additional percentage, on top of the allocated research funding, goes to the facility housing their work to cover these ‘indirect costs.’ According to the announcement, that percentage has historically been around 27 to 28% for each grant; however, the new directive is now imposing a 15% threshold, unless otherwise negotiated. 

‘Most private foundations that fund research provide substantially lower indirect costs than the federal government, and universities readily accept grants from these foundations. For example, a recent study found that the most common rate of indirect rate reimbursement by foundations was 0%, meaning many foundations do not fund indirect costs whatsoever,’ NIH’s announcement, released Friday evening, stated. ‘In addition, many of the nation’s largest funders of research—such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation—have a maximum indirect rate of 15%. And in the case of the Gates Foundation, the maximum indirect costs rate is 10% for institutions of higher education.’

Some universities responded to the new, indirect cost cap with confusion and backlash.

The University of Wisconsin-Madison put out a statement arguing the new indirect cost cap will ‘significantly disrupt vital research activity and daily life-saving discoveries.’ It added that the move will also ‘have an inevitable impact on student opportunities to engage in research activities.’ 

At the University of Michigan, which currently has a negotiated indirect cost rate with the federal government of 56%, the school put out a statement emphasizing the ‘great deal of uncertainty’ over how the policy will be implemented. The school said it has begun investigating the implications of this new rule on its current grants.  

‘It seems like it is of a piece with the sort of slash-and-burn philosophy of the current administration,’ Dr. Francis P. Wilson, a Yale associate professor of medicine and public health, told the Yale Daily News. ‘It feels indiscriminate and abrupt, executed with little regard for the potential downstream consequences.’

The Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, applauded the move in a post on social media. ‘Amazing job by the NIH team,’ the group said in a post on social media. ‘Saved > $4B annually in excessive grant administrative costs.’

‘Can you believe that universities with tens of billions in endowments were siphoning off 60% of research award money for ‘overhead’?’ Musk also posted on social media. ‘What a ripoff!’

‘Contrary to the hysteria, redirecting billions of allocated NIH spending away from administrative bloat means there will be more money and resources available for legitimate scientific research, not less,’ added White House spokesperson Kush Desai in a statement to Fox News Digital.

The NIH declined to comment for this story. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Iran’s campaign trail threats against Trump more serious than publicly reported, book claims
next post
Dems flirt with government shutdown threat despite past furor over spending cliff

You may also like

US and Israel urgently need to replenish weapons...

July 24, 2025

The Kiss of Death: US Knocked Out of...

December 4, 2022

Trump-aligned group putting pressure on Republican senators in...

February 3, 2025

Former Commander in 101st Airborne: Refusing Jab Was...

November 29, 2022

5 terrifying flashpoints that could ignite global war

June 9, 2025

Former Georgetown Professor After Supreme Court Hearing On...

November 1, 2022

Sen. Rand Paul says criticism of Ukraine funding...

October 5, 2023

Dem senator urges Supreme Court to reinstate major...

July 19, 2023

Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks Governor DeSantis’ “Stop Woke Act”...

November 18, 2022

Black Massachusetts Mother Films Herself Helping Daughter Brutally...

September 29, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Gen Z workers turn back to office jobs to combat loneliness

      August 25, 2025
    • US jobs market faces ‘Trump slump’ as tariffs and cuts hit growth

      August 25, 2025
    • Royal Mail and DHL suspend US parcel deliveries as Trump tariffs take effect

      August 25, 2025
    • Farmers warn of crisis as poll shows 80% fear for survival and none back Labour

      August 25, 2025
    • TikTok cuts threaten hundreds of UK content moderator jobs amid AI shift

      August 25, 2025
    • Hospitality hit hardest as nearly 90,000 jobs lost after budget tax rises

      August 25, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,874)
    • Investing (2,235)
    • Politics (16,476)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved