Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Federal appeals court dismisses classified records case against former Trump co-defendants

by February 11, 2025
February 11, 2025

A federal appeals court dismissed the appeal charges brought against President Donald Trump aides Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira by former Special Counsel Jack Smith in his classified documents case, Fox News Digital has learned. 

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case against Nauta and De Oliveira on Tuesday morning, two weeks after the Justice Department moved to drop the charges.

Nauta, Trump’s valet, and De Oliveira, the property manager of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, had pleaded not guilty to federal charges alleging they conspired to obstruct the FBI investigation into classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago. 

The Justice Department had filed a motion in January to drop all criminal proceedings against Nauta and De Oliveira, putting an end to Smith’s probe more than two years after it began.

Former Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith, a former Justice Department official, as special counsel in November 2022. 

Smith, a former assistant U.S. attorney and chief to the DOJ’s public integrity section, led the investigation into Trump’s retention of classified documents after leaving the White House and whether the former president obstructed the federal government’s investigation into the matter. 

Smith also was tasked with overseeing the investigation into whether Trump or other officials and entities interfered with the peaceful transfer of power following the 2020 presidential election, including the certification of the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6, 2021. 

Smith charged Trump in both cases, but Trump pleaded not guilty.

The classified records case was dismissed in July 2024 by U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Judge Aileen Cannon, who ruled that Smith was unlawfully appointed as special counsel. 

Smith charged Trump in the U.S. District Court for Washington, D.C., in his 2020 election case, but after Trump was elected president, Smith sought to dismiss the case. Judge Tanya Chutkan granted that request. 

Both cases were dismissed. 

The Justice Department, in January, fired more than a dozen key officials who worked on Smith’s team prosecuting the president, after then-acting Attorney General James McHenry said they could not be trusted in ‘faithfully implementing the president’s agenda.’ 

Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove has also directed acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll to identify agents involved in Jan. 6 prosecutions for internal review. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump nominees debut new science journal aimed at spurring scientific discourse, increasing transparency
next post
More than half a million law enforcement personnel back Patel as FBI director

You may also like

SEE IT: John Fetterman landed brief, non-speaking part...

January 11, 2023

Former doctor for Trump, Obama slams White House’s...

June 4, 2023

Indiana mail-in voting crackdown headed to governor’s desk

April 12, 2023

Republican mega-donor to bankroll pro-Trump super PAC in...

May 30, 2024

Arkansas Department of Education throws down gauntlet on...

August 22, 2023

Most Republicans support Trump ordered military strike on...

June 24, 2025

Legislative standstill may lead to tuition hikes at...

July 12, 2023

AOC’s campaign keeps paying Chinese foreign agent, FEC...

July 29, 2023

DeSantis challenges Trump: ‘Why are you running?’

December 4, 2023

Biden tells reporter at Japan G7 summit to...

May 21, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump Accounts Won’t Replace Social Security or Help Americans Build Significant Wealth

      August 4, 2025
    • How Special Interests Keep Bad Laws on the Books: The Case of the Jones Act

      August 4, 2025
    • Four Cymru partners with Wales Tech Week to showcase Welsh innovation on the global stage

      August 4, 2025
    • Rachel Reeves urged to apply VAT to private healthcare in bid to fund NHS

      August 4, 2025
    • Trump accuses Senate Democrats of using nominee confirmations as leverage for funding deals

      August 4, 2025
    • UK high street banks lose £100bn in savings as customers chase better rates online

      August 4, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,658)
    • Investing (2,170)
    • Politics (16,293)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved