Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

by February 12, 2025
February 12, 2025
Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

Jeffrey Miron

President Donald Trump has reportedly shown a strong interest in privatizing the US Postal Service (USPS). Proponents of the USPS applaud its mandate to provide mail service to every American at uniform rates; critics claim it is less efficient than private competitors and no longer financially viable (if it ever was).

From its inception, the USPS was intended to be a public good, not a profit-making entity. Indeed, in 1958, federal law declared it “clearly not a business enterprise conducted for profit.” But non-profits should not be financial black holes, and universal service should not require billions in annual losses, as demonstrated by private providers.

At present, the USPS is a failing monopoly. Title 39 of the US Code hinders private carriers’ ability to compete by requiring weight minimums and USPS approval for packages. Additionally, only USPS may use mailboxes. The USPS also receives substantial financial aid from taxpayers: $120 billion since 2020. Despite this legal and fiscal aid, USPS has run a deficit every year since 2007, accumulating a total loss of $108 billion. And service quality continues to decline—between 2022 and 2024, the percentage of packages delivered on time fell substantially.

A possible response to these financial difficulties is the removal of rules that make the USPS less profitable. The USPS must offer reduced postage rates for certain users, such as non-profits, and its uniform rate requirement means serving remote areas at the same price as cities. Repealing these restrictions would allow USPS to be more competitive.

An even better response is to privatize the USPS. This would eliminate its uniform price and service mandate and allow it to close unprofitable locations. Privatizing would also eliminate restrictions on private carriers’ activity, enhancing their efficiency.

A key aspect of this privatization is that it must be complete, or nearly so. Since Britain sold a majority stake in its national postal service, the share price has fallen about 25 percent. But Royal Mail failed to eliminate the barriers that made it unprofitable, such as uniform pricing. Mail services such as FedEx and UPS show that private mail couriers can function effectively.

Ultimately, the case for privatization is one of efficiency, competition, and fiscal responsibility. By privatizing the USPS, the US could foster a competitive, market-driven postal industry that better serves consumers and taxpayers alike.

This article appeared on Substack on February 13, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Tulsi Gabbard confirmation vote kicks off Wednesday morning after snowstorm thwarts midnight session
next post
Economic Growth Won’t Save Social Security: New Paper Release

You may also like

Tennessee Auctioneers Make a Bid for Free Speech

October 18, 2024

In 1932-33 Leading Intellectuals Used ‘Dictatorial’ as a...

September 21, 2023

Bipartisan Stirrings on the National Emergencies Act

June 5, 2024

America in Debt: Remarks at the Coolidge Foundation...

April 1, 2024

Calling for Papers! Beyond the Fourteenth Amendment: Protecting...

August 22, 2023

Tax Expenditure Madness Bracket: Pick the Worst Tax...

March 21, 2025

2022 Arms Sales Risk Index

July 18, 2023

Argentines Are All Peronists No Longer

August 14, 2023

Rep. Miller‐​Meeks’ OTC Act Might Nudge the FDA...

July 14, 2023

How Common Has Private Currency Been?

August 16, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Tariffs on Imports from China Are Still Too High

      May 23, 2025
    • US and Iran clash over uranium enrichment as nuclear talks resume in Rome

      May 23, 2025
    • Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners released in swap with Russia, Zelenskyy says

      May 23, 2025
    • Financial Surveillance Is Expanding—But So Is the Resistance

      May 23, 2025
    • SCOOP: House GOP memo highlights Republican wins in Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      May 23, 2025
    • Don’t Put a Tariff on Barbie: Global Trade Increases the Variety and Lowers the Price of Dolls and Almost All Else We Buy

      May 23, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,036)
    • Investing (1,984)
    • Politics (15,359)
    • Stocks (3,101)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved