Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

by February 12, 2025
February 12, 2025
Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

Jeffrey Miron

President Donald Trump has reportedly shown a strong interest in privatizing the US Postal Service (USPS). Proponents of the USPS applaud its mandate to provide mail service to every American at uniform rates; critics claim it is less efficient than private competitors and no longer financially viable (if it ever was).

From its inception, the USPS was intended to be a public good, not a profit-making entity. Indeed, in 1958, federal law declared it “clearly not a business enterprise conducted for profit.” But non-profits should not be financial black holes, and universal service should not require billions in annual losses, as demonstrated by private providers.

At present, the USPS is a failing monopoly. Title 39 of the US Code hinders private carriers’ ability to compete by requiring weight minimums and USPS approval for packages. Additionally, only USPS may use mailboxes. The USPS also receives substantial financial aid from taxpayers: $120 billion since 2020. Despite this legal and fiscal aid, USPS has run a deficit every year since 2007, accumulating a total loss of $108 billion. And service quality continues to decline—between 2022 and 2024, the percentage of packages delivered on time fell substantially.

A possible response to these financial difficulties is the removal of rules that make the USPS less profitable. The USPS must offer reduced postage rates for certain users, such as non-profits, and its uniform rate requirement means serving remote areas at the same price as cities. Repealing these restrictions would allow USPS to be more competitive.

An even better response is to privatize the USPS. This would eliminate its uniform price and service mandate and allow it to close unprofitable locations. Privatizing would also eliminate restrictions on private carriers’ activity, enhancing their efficiency.

A key aspect of this privatization is that it must be complete, or nearly so. Since Britain sold a majority stake in its national postal service, the share price has fallen about 25 percent. But Royal Mail failed to eliminate the barriers that made it unprofitable, such as uniform pricing. Mail services such as FedEx and UPS show that private mail couriers can function effectively.

Ultimately, the case for privatization is one of efficiency, competition, and fiscal responsibility. By privatizing the USPS, the US could foster a competitive, market-driven postal industry that better serves consumers and taxpayers alike.

This article appeared on Substack on February 13, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Tulsi Gabbard confirmation vote kicks off Wednesday morning after snowstorm thwarts midnight session
next post
Economic Growth Won’t Save Social Security: New Paper Release

You may also like

Green Energy Trash

November 12, 2024

“Where the Writ of the Courts Does Not...

April 15, 2025

How Can You Miss a Deadline Before You Even...

May 24, 2023

David Boaz, Our Great Persuader

June 7, 2024

A New K-12 Productivity Chart

March 10, 2025

Breaking Down Taiwan’s Arms Backlog, Part 2: Maintenance

November 9, 2023

Maine Legalizes the Sale of Prostitution Services

July 3, 2023

What Are the Black Students Still Getting into...

September 26, 2024

Maybe Most People Do Not Want Teacher-Led Public...

June 27, 2025

Pass-Through Deduction Wins Worst Tax Expenditure

April 7, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Wimbledon winners to pay up to £1.3m in tax as HMRC claims £17m from prize pot

      July 4, 2025
    • Saudi defense minister secretly meets with Trump to discuss Iran de-escalation, Israel: sources

      July 4, 2025
    • Trump administration swarms SCOTUS with emergency requests and sees surprising success

      July 4, 2025
    • Mike Johnson touts ‘beauty of unified government’ after Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ sails through Congress

      July 3, 2025
    • From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the Move

      July 3, 2025
    • Bank Capital Standards

      July 3, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,380)
    • Investing (2,102)
    • Politics (15,941)
    • Stocks (3,189)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved