Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

by February 12, 2025
February 12, 2025
Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

Jeffrey Miron

President Donald Trump has reportedly shown a strong interest in privatizing the US Postal Service (USPS). Proponents of the USPS applaud its mandate to provide mail service to every American at uniform rates; critics claim it is less efficient than private competitors and no longer financially viable (if it ever was).

From its inception, the USPS was intended to be a public good, not a profit-making entity. Indeed, in 1958, federal law declared it “clearly not a business enterprise conducted for profit.” But non-profits should not be financial black holes, and universal service should not require billions in annual losses, as demonstrated by private providers.

At present, the USPS is a failing monopoly. Title 39 of the US Code hinders private carriers’ ability to compete by requiring weight minimums and USPS approval for packages. Additionally, only USPS may use mailboxes. The USPS also receives substantial financial aid from taxpayers: $120 billion since 2020. Despite this legal and fiscal aid, USPS has run a deficit every year since 2007, accumulating a total loss of $108 billion. And service quality continues to decline—between 2022 and 2024, the percentage of packages delivered on time fell substantially.

A possible response to these financial difficulties is the removal of rules that make the USPS less profitable. The USPS must offer reduced postage rates for certain users, such as non-profits, and its uniform rate requirement means serving remote areas at the same price as cities. Repealing these restrictions would allow USPS to be more competitive.

An even better response is to privatize the USPS. This would eliminate its uniform price and service mandate and allow it to close unprofitable locations. Privatizing would also eliminate restrictions on private carriers’ activity, enhancing their efficiency.

A key aspect of this privatization is that it must be complete, or nearly so. Since Britain sold a majority stake in its national postal service, the share price has fallen about 25 percent. But Royal Mail failed to eliminate the barriers that made it unprofitable, such as uniform pricing. Mail services such as FedEx and UPS show that private mail couriers can function effectively.

Ultimately, the case for privatization is one of efficiency, competition, and fiscal responsibility. By privatizing the USPS, the US could foster a competitive, market-driven postal industry that better serves consumers and taxpayers alike.

This article appeared on Substack on February 13, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Tulsi Gabbard confirmation vote kicks off Wednesday morning after snowstorm thwarts midnight session
next post
Economic Growth Won’t Save Social Security: New Paper Release

You may also like

Industrial Policy, Whether Republican or Democrat, is Anti-Liberty

January 3, 2025

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to...

September 11, 2024

Washington Post Global Social Security Comparison Misses the...

September 5, 2024

Friday Feature: St. Ambrose Academy

September 20, 2024

Postal Reforms Abroad

April 10, 2025

Access to Methadone Treatment Is Pathetically Low

June 28, 2024

Friday Feature: A One-Room Schoolhouse

July 5, 2024

Will the Added IRS Funding Create Value?

May 9, 2023

Parsing the Factual Errors in the Montana Climate...

August 18, 2023

Trends in Base Erosion and Profit Shifting

August 25, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Israel launches sweeping strike on Iran while Trump administration seeks diplomatic solution

      June 13, 2025
    • ‘Killed off Elmo’: Jeffries brings along stuffed friend for stunt on House floor

      June 13, 2025
    • RRG Update: Is Tech Ready to Break Out?

      June 13, 2025
    • ‘Fully justified’: Graham plows ahead with Trump border funding despite Paul’s objections

      June 12, 2025
    • Mike Lawler tells NY Dem to ‘f— off’ after chaos ignites on House floor

      June 12, 2025
    • White House takes interest in proposed Russian sanctions as Ukraine War peace talks drag on

      June 12, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,200)
    • Investing (2,031)
    • Politics (15,625)
    • Stocks (3,144)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved