Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

by February 12, 2025
February 12, 2025
Should the US Government Privatize the Post Office?

Jeffrey Miron

President Donald Trump has reportedly shown a strong interest in privatizing the US Postal Service (USPS). Proponents of the USPS applaud its mandate to provide mail service to every American at uniform rates; critics claim it is less efficient than private competitors and no longer financially viable (if it ever was).

From its inception, the USPS was intended to be a public good, not a profit-making entity. Indeed, in 1958, federal law declared it “clearly not a business enterprise conducted for profit.” But non-profits should not be financial black holes, and universal service should not require billions in annual losses, as demonstrated by private providers.

At present, the USPS is a failing monopoly. Title 39 of the US Code hinders private carriers’ ability to compete by requiring weight minimums and USPS approval for packages. Additionally, only USPS may use mailboxes. The USPS also receives substantial financial aid from taxpayers: $120 billion since 2020. Despite this legal and fiscal aid, USPS has run a deficit every year since 2007, accumulating a total loss of $108 billion. And service quality continues to decline—between 2022 and 2024, the percentage of packages delivered on time fell substantially.

A possible response to these financial difficulties is the removal of rules that make the USPS less profitable. The USPS must offer reduced postage rates for certain users, such as non-profits, and its uniform rate requirement means serving remote areas at the same price as cities. Repealing these restrictions would allow USPS to be more competitive.

An even better response is to privatize the USPS. This would eliminate its uniform price and service mandate and allow it to close unprofitable locations. Privatizing would also eliminate restrictions on private carriers’ activity, enhancing their efficiency.

A key aspect of this privatization is that it must be complete, or nearly so. Since Britain sold a majority stake in its national postal service, the share price has fallen about 25 percent. But Royal Mail failed to eliminate the barriers that made it unprofitable, such as uniform pricing. Mail services such as FedEx and UPS show that private mail couriers can function effectively.

Ultimately, the case for privatization is one of efficiency, competition, and fiscal responsibility. By privatizing the USPS, the US could foster a competitive, market-driven postal industry that better serves consumers and taxpayers alike.

This article appeared on Substack on February 13, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Tulsi Gabbard confirmation vote kicks off Wednesday morning after snowstorm thwarts midnight session
next post
Economic Growth Won’t Save Social Security: New Paper Release

You may also like

Nine Examples of Waste in the New Markets...

August 6, 2025

3.8 Million Middle Eastern or North Africans in...

September 27, 2023

List of 120+ Biden Actions to Help Try...

February 23, 2024

2023 Was a Record Year for Public Schooling...

January 3, 2024

Brookings Paper Is Not Concrete Evidence That a...

June 1, 2023

Six Questions on Donald Trump’s Conviction

June 18, 2024

The Nvidia/AMD-Trump Deal: Legal Questions, Crony Capitalism, and...

August 13, 2025

Preventing and Reversing FCC Interference in Telecom and...

January 7, 2025

The CBO Budget and Economic Outlook: Debt Projected...

February 8, 2024

Nigeria’s CBDC Was Not Chosen. It Was Forced

May 15, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • NATO defense chiefs stress commitment to Ukraine, discuss security guarantees during virtual summit

      August 21, 2025
    • Russian drone crashes in Polish field; Warsaw protests airspace violation and plans formal complaint

      August 21, 2025
    • Gabbard launches ‘ODNI 2.0,’ with plan to cut workforce by 40%

      August 20, 2025
    • How to set up a smart home on a budget after graduation

      August 20, 2025
    • A Retired Warfighter’s Perspective on the Protectionist BOOTS Act

      August 20, 2025
    • Preserving Educational Choice: Isolated Cases of Misuse Shouldn’t Derail ESA Progress

      August 20, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,838)
    • Investing (2,227)
    • Politics (16,450)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved