Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Business

UK marketplace sellers brace for ‘second Brexit’ as Trump’s new US import rules loom

by February 18, 2025
February 18, 2025
UK marketplace sellers brace for ‘second Brexit’ as Trump’s new US import rules loom

British companies selling via online marketplaces could be hit hard by Donald Trump’s forthcoming import regulations, with industry experts warning of a “second Brexit” in terms of disruption to trade.

The changes, introduced in early February but now paused, demand that goods originating from China and sold to the US pay standard import duty—of up to 15% for fashion items—plus an additional 10% tariff. The measures may significantly affect independent UK sellers on platforms such as eBay and Amazon, as well as online retailers like Asos and Boohoo that manufacture in China and rely on US sales.

Originally intended to curb a surge in cut-price imports from Chinese e-commerce giants such as Shein and Temu, the new requirements led to a massive uptick in parcels needing customs checks, overwhelming US border authorities. Implementation has been put on hold, yet many industry insiders believe it is only a matter of time before the policy takes effect. Observers add that the “de minimis” rule, which had previously exempted parcels under $800 (£635) from import duties and checks, looks set to be scrapped. Last year, more than a billion parcels benefiting from these rules reached the US, often containing items made in China or Hong Kong.

For British sellers, the prospect of higher fees and stricter checks presents a considerable barrier. According to Brad Ashton of consultancy firm RSM, such measures will increase shipping costs between $30 to $50 per consignment, squeezing margins and deterring smaller operators from accessing the vast American market. Some experts believe the impact could rival the upheaval caused by Brexit, especially for independent traders who lack the resources to absorb extra customs duties or reorganise supply chains.

“There’s a real risk the UK becomes uncompetitive overnight,” Ashton says. “If it costs too much to send goods stateside, many sellers may have to scale back or even exit the market.”

Although Asos and Boohoo already have global supply networks, the widespread use of Chinese factories means these larger brands also fall under the new regime. In theory, any product with even a small Chinese component could trigger US import duty, adding time and expense. John Stevenson, a retail analyst at Peel Hunt, points out that while the costs might not be “business-critical” for these fast-fashion giants, they will still need to reassess prices and shipping times if the tax regime tightens.

Critics of the move highlight that it may end up driving up prices for American consumers, while causing headaches for UK exporters navigating unexpected fees. Chris White of logistics firm Fulfilmentcrowd recalls that, when Trump’s rules briefly took effect in early February, nearly one-third of parcels shipped from the UK to the US were flagged for extra duties. The resulting confusion, including varying charges levied by local customs officials, harmed consumer confidence and posed additional challenges for e-tailers.

The removal of de minimis status for Chinese goods also raises questions about “British” or “European” branding, particularly for labels that rely heavily on Chinese production. With the possibility of origin checks and disclosure, some fear damage to brand reputations if goods touted as British are uncovered to be manufactured offshore. Longer term, UK companies might consider establishing US warehouses or shifting supply chains away from China to minimise disruption. Boohoo recently closed its American facility, and Asos plans to do the same this autumn, but a policy reversal could see them rethink such decisions.

It is still unclear when the policy might be reinstated. Trump’s administration must bolster the capacity of US Customs and Border Protection to handle the increased workload, a process that could take weeks or months. While there is a chance of yet another shift in stance—particularly as the US has backed down in past trade disputes—analysts say no British business can rely on changing political winds.

In the meantime, many UK marketplace sellers are left in limbo, preparing contingencies reminiscent of the Brexit period. For small players without the clout of major brands, that could mean anything from reduced margins to giving up on the lucrative American market altogether.

Read more:
UK marketplace sellers brace for ‘second Brexit’ as Trump’s new US import rules loom

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
UK pay growth accelerates as real wages climb, fuelling BOE concerns
next post
RFK Jr’s health agenda gains popularity among state lawmakers

You may also like

UK SMEs remain optimistic, with growth plans driven...

September 23, 2024

Demystifying the Differences Between RTLS and RFID

February 5, 2024

Which Suitcase Components Provide The Most Value When...

May 7, 2024

UK Recruiters warn Bank of England of permanent...

December 8, 2023

Top 8 Applications of Custom Gears in Manufacturing

April 1, 2025

A Happy New Year for UK’s optimistic SMEs,...

January 4, 2023

Turn empty London offices into nightlife hotspots, says...

July 14, 2025

Creating a Foolproof Holiday Budget: The Role of...

December 14, 2023

Santander to close nearly 100 branches, putting 750...

March 19, 2025

British butchers see sales boost as plant-based alternatives...

July 4, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Schumer says century-old law forces Trump DOJ, FBI to release Jeffrey Epstein files by August deadline

      July 30, 2025
    • Agent’s alleged attempt to smuggle wife on Trump’s Scotland trip being probed in latest Secret Service fiasco

      July 30, 2025
    • Grassley rebukes Trump’s pressure to ‘have the courage’ to speed up nominations

      July 30, 2025
    • Who is Steve Ricchetti, the longtime Biden confidante questioned in Comer’s cover-up probe?

      July 30, 2025
    • Trump says his Aug 1 tariff deadline ‘will not be extended’ – here are the countries that might not make it

      July 30, 2025
    • The Future of Immersive Gaming: So What Is a VR Casino, Really?

      July 30, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,618)
    • Investing (2,158)
    • Politics (16,246)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved