Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Come Back with a Warrant

by February 24, 2025
February 24, 2025
Come Back with a Warrant

Clark Neily

On February 10, Cato filed an amicus brief in the Fifth Circuit supporting a challenge to Texas’s “Right to Examine” statute, which grants the state attorney general authority to demand immediate access to any corporate records without a warrant or prior judicial review. The brief argues that the statute is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment based on the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. Patel (2015), which struck down a law requiring hotel owners to share information about guests upon demand.

The Fourth Amendment was designed specifically to prevent the type of unchecked executive power authorized by the Right to Examine statute. In Patel, the Supreme Court held that laws penalizing regulated parties for declining to turn over records without offering any opportunity for “precompliance review” by a neutral decisionmaker violate the Fourth Amendment. The Right to Examine statute fails this test, as it requires corporations to “immediately permit” inspection of records under threat of criminal penalties and loss of the right to do business in Texas.

Texas argues that the statute’s century-old existence protects it from constitutional scrutiny. However, when Texas enacted the Right to Examine statute in 1907, the Fourth Amendment hadn’t yet been incorporated against the states. The state also incorrectly claims “visitorial powers” over corporations exempt it from Fourth Amendment constraints.

The Texas attorney general’s broad interpretation of the statute is particularly troubling given the facts of this case. The AG demanded documents related to out-of-state manufacturing and diversity practices from Spirit Aerosystems—a Delaware corporation headquartered in Kansas with no relevant Texas operations—in areas where the AG lacks clear investigative authority.

The statute also creates a chilling effect on businesses. Without proper judicial safeguards, corporations face the risk of politically motivated investigations and harassment. This uncertainty discourages business growth and threatens Texas’s economic competitiveness at a time when the state already faces increasing regulatory pressure.

For these reasons, we urge the Fifth Circuit to affirm the district court’s ruling that Texas’s Right to Examine statute violates the Fourth Amendment.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump rescinds Biden order protecting gender clinics from investigation, signals new whistleblower protections
next post
‘Overwhelmingly popular’: Elon Musk touts Americans’ DOGE support

You may also like

Wagyu Farmer in Congress Wants Tariffs on Australian...

May 15, 2025

The Cult of the Presidency: 2024 Edition

September 16, 2024

Spending Cuts for 2025

November 19, 2024

Iron Law of Prohibition: Nicotine Edition

May 30, 2024

Friday Feature: Path of Life Learning

March 1, 2024

Has the Overdose Death Rate Peaked? Insights from...

November 19, 2024

Grow the Economic Pie, Don’t Reallocate It

October 28, 2024

Juries as a Bulwark Against Oppression

January 13, 2025

How Much Does School Quality Vary?

October 16, 2024

Comparing California and Florida FY 2023–24 Budgets

July 3, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump ally stands firm against ‘big, beautiful bill’ despite pressure: ‘It’ll completely backfire’

      June 8, 2025
    • Rubio condemns assassination attempt on Colombian presidential candidate Miguel Uribe

      June 8, 2025
    • Obama WH physician says Biden doc should have performed cognitive test

      June 8, 2025
    • Trump warns of ‘serious consequences’ if Elon Musk funds Democrats

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff’s praise

      June 7, 2025
    • Musk deletes explosive posts about Trump and Epstein files

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,571)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved