Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

A Prelude to New FTC Scrutiny of Occupational Licensing?

by March 4, 2025
March 4, 2025
A Prelude to New FTC Scrutiny of Occupational Licensing?

Stephen Slivinski

Last week, the new Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson created a task force that, among other things, lists “harmful occupational licensing requirements” among its list of top concerns.

All indications suggest that the FTC under President Trump is likely to be just as activist as the Biden FTC in equally bad ways but against different targets (like social media companies). The envisioned task force is largely aimed at a number of private-sector business practices—like non-compete agreements, for instance—that may not really be a problem or, if so, may not require a government-forced remedy. 

Despite the fever dreams of occupational licensing geeks like me, it was probably just a coincidence that this task force was announced a day after the tenth anniversary of the SCOTUS decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners vs FTC that slapped the state licensing board for basically acting as enforcers for the dental industry cartel of incumbent practitioners when they declared war on non-dentist teeth-whitening businesses. (For more about that decision and what liberty-minded policy reformers can take away from it, have a listen to our recent webinar or a look at this blogpost.) 

If the task force is looking for inspiration, they could do far worse than look to that decision, particularly as it showcases one useful thing the FTC has done to push back on actual anti-competitive practices that harm American workers and consumers. 

Licensing reform, to be sure, fundamentally requires state-based reforms because they are state-based laws. But if the enforcement mechanism of those laws violates federal statutes—via quasi-governmental licensing boards that strive to protect their turf, not consumers—there is at least some defensible claim for the federal government to get involved. The renewed scrutiny might even spur state legislators to make long-overdue reductions to licensing barriers, a leashing of anticompetitive boards, or (hopefully) both. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump urged by ‘fiscal responsibility’ group to show he’s ‘serious’ about $36T debt
next post
Corporate Welfare Spending

You may also like

Reflections on My Visit to Fudan University After...

October 28, 2024

FTC Gets 2/3 of the Infant Formula Crisis...

March 25, 2024

The Supreme Court Should Save TikTok

January 7, 2025

Tariffs, Uncertainty, and Small Businesses

March 14, 2025

Australia Withdraws One Bad Online Speech Bill as...

November 27, 2024

More on Free Trade’s “Pro-Poor Bias”

March 29, 2024

Energy Department Not Interested In Government Transparency

August 14, 2025

Friday Feature: Bramblewood Learning Community

August 18, 2023

Inflation News Is Still Exaggerated by Dubious Shelter...

July 11, 2024

‘De-Globalization’ Still Isn’t Happening (At Least Not Yet)

February 6, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • CDC Director Susan Monarez refuses to be fired as other officials call it quits

      August 28, 2025
    • Bill Gates met with Trump to talk ‘importance of US global health programs and health research’: spox

      August 28, 2025
    • Trump asks SCOTUS to uphold freeze on billions in USAID payments

      August 27, 2025
    • Three Years of Sounding the Debt Alarm at Cato and on the Debt Dispatch

      August 27, 2025
    • Trump Administration Rightly Attacks EU Tech Regulations but Tariffs and Censorship at Home Harm Americans 

      August 27, 2025
    • White House demands all Gaza hostages return home ‘this week’ amid stalled talks

      August 27, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,897)
    • Investing (2,246)
    • Politics (16,503)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved