Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

A Prelude to New FTC Scrutiny of Occupational Licensing?

by March 4, 2025
March 4, 2025
A Prelude to New FTC Scrutiny of Occupational Licensing?

Stephen Slivinski

Last week, the new Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson created a task force that, among other things, lists “harmful occupational licensing requirements” among its list of top concerns.

All indications suggest that the FTC under President Trump is likely to be just as activist as the Biden FTC in equally bad ways but against different targets (like social media companies). The envisioned task force is largely aimed at a number of private-sector business practices—like non-compete agreements, for instance—that may not really be a problem or, if so, may not require a government-forced remedy. 

Despite the fever dreams of occupational licensing geeks like me, it was probably just a coincidence that this task force was announced a day after the tenth anniversary of the SCOTUS decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners vs FTC that slapped the state licensing board for basically acting as enforcers for the dental industry cartel of incumbent practitioners when they declared war on non-dentist teeth-whitening businesses. (For more about that decision and what liberty-minded policy reformers can take away from it, have a listen to our recent webinar or a look at this blogpost.) 

If the task force is looking for inspiration, they could do far worse than look to that decision, particularly as it showcases one useful thing the FTC has done to push back on actual anti-competitive practices that harm American workers and consumers. 

Licensing reform, to be sure, fundamentally requires state-based reforms because they are state-based laws. But if the enforcement mechanism of those laws violates federal statutes—via quasi-governmental licensing boards that strive to protect their turf, not consumers—there is at least some defensible claim for the federal government to get involved. The renewed scrutiny might even spur state legislators to make long-overdue reductions to licensing barriers, a leashing of anticompetitive boards, or (hopefully) both. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump urged by ‘fiscal responsibility’ group to show he’s ‘serious’ about $36T debt
next post
Corporate Welfare Spending

You may also like

Harvard and UNC Should Be Treated Differently

July 5, 2023

Friday Feature: A One-Room Schoolhouse

July 5, 2024

President Biden’s Magical Thinking in the Middle East

June 10, 2024

Friday Feature: Classic Learning Test

September 6, 2024

How to Upgrade House Stablecoin Bill 2.0 to...

May 17, 2023

Javier Milei at Cato Conference: “I’m a Liberal...

September 27, 2024

Come Back with a Warrant

February 24, 2025

DOGE Recommendations: Federal Health Spending

December 11, 2024

Farm Bill 2023: Crop Insurance Subsidies

July 18, 2023

Open Primaries Versus a Nonpartisan Universal Primary

October 11, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Week Ahead: NIFTY’s Behavior Against This Level Crucial As The Index Looks At Potential Resumption Of An Upmove

      June 7, 2025
    • FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here’s where they said they would

      June 7, 2025
    • ‘Right down the line’: Medicaid reform in ‘big, beautiful bill’ divides lawmakers by party

      June 7, 2025
    • FAST distribution and IA

      June 7, 2025
    • Why Independent Digital Platforms Are Gaining Ground Among UK Entrepreneurs

      June 7, 2025
    • Is Decentralisation the Future of Online Services in the UK?

      June 7, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,152)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,560)
    • Stocks (3,135)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved