Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Conservative justices ‘stunned’ by Supreme Court’s USAID decision, lambaste majority in scathing dissent

by March 5, 2025
March 5, 2025

Four conservative Supreme Court justices penned a blistering dissent Wednesday after the court majority rejected the Trump administration’s request to continue a temporary freeze on foreign aid payments. 

​​Justice Samuel Alito excoriated the high court majority for allowing a lower court judge to single-handedly determine the timeline for the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 million in payments for previously completed foreign aid projects – an order he called ‘too extreme.’ 

In a scathing eight-page dissent, Alito called the decision an ‘unfortunate misstep’ and one he said ‘rewards an act of judicial hubris’ by U.S. District Judge Amir Ali.

‘Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars? The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise,’ Alito wrote.

‘I am stunned.’

He was joined in the dissent by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. 

While Alito and the other dissenting justices acknowledged Wednesday that the plaintiffs raised ‘serious concerns about nonpayment’ for their completed work, they argued that Ali’s repayment order and time frame was ‘too extreme,’ as it gave the administration just two weeks to comply.

‘The District Court has made plain its frustration with the Government, and respondents raise serious concerns about nonpayment for completed work,’ they said in their dissent. ‘But the relief ordered is, quite simply, too extreme a response.’

The 5-4 Supreme Court decision remands the case back to the D.C. federal court – and Judge Ali – to hash out the specifics of what must be paid, and when.

At issue in the case was how quickly the Trump administration needed to pay the nearly $2 billion owed to aid groups and contractors for completed projects funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), at a time when the administration has issued a blanket freeze on all foreign spending in the name of government ‘efficiency’ and eliminating waste.

The funds had been frozen as part of the administration’s block on all foreign aid, prompting international groups and contractors to file a lawsuit last month, prompting the Trump administration to file an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court.

Chief Justice John Roberts intervened, agreeing to pause the timeline to allow the full court to consider the case.

Acting U.S. Solicitor General Sarah Harris argued that while the plaintiffs’ claims were likely ‘legitimate,’ the time set by Ali was ‘impossible’ and ‘not logistically or technically feasible.’

Ali, for his part, moved quickly Wednesday to take action on the unpaid foreign aid case – setting a new court hearing Thursday afternoon to consider the matter.

In a minute order, the court said lawyers for both parties should come prepared to discuss a proposed schedule for the Trump administration to comply with the outstanding payments.

Fox News’ Jake Gibson contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Fired NLRB commissioner asks federal judge for reinstatement
next post
New Section 232 Investigation on Timber and Lumber Will Raise Prices for Homebuilders … and More Legal Questions

You may also like

China mocks Biden for knocking down balloons with...

February 12, 2023

Steve Cortes on the War Room – Biden’s...

November 25, 2022

Army Investigating Officers For Wearing Fetish “Pup” Masks...

December 15, 2022

McCarthy has US Capitol flags lowered half-staff, honors...

August 27, 2023

CNN Head Confirms Layoffs at the Network as...

November 17, 2022

Iranian president calls for negotiation and dialogue as...

May 19, 2025

Harris campaign breaking fundraising records in race against...

July 23, 2024

‘Progressive Policing’ In Action – Criminals in Washington...

October 11, 2022

Twitter Co-Founder and Former CEO Jack Dorsey Responds...

December 14, 2022

Federal judge strikes down California’s ‘fee-shifting’ gun control...

December 20, 2022

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Homeless people can be removed from streets by cities, states in new Trump executive order

      July 24, 2025
    • US pulls team from ceasefire talks in Qatar after Israel does the same, claiming Hamas is acting in bad faith

      July 24, 2025
    • US and Israel urgently need to replenish weapons stockpiles after 12-day war, defense analysts warn

      July 24, 2025
    • Ron Klain dodges reporters after marathon grilling in Biden cover-up probe

      July 24, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Newly declassified documents destroy Russian collusion hoax

      July 24, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      July 24, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,568)
    • Investing (2,145)
    • Politics (16,192)
    • Stocks (3,227)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved