Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

The FDA Finally Removes a Huge Barrier to an Effective Schizophrenia Medicine

by March 7, 2025
March 7, 2025
The FDA Finally Removes a Huge Barrier to an Effective Schizophrenia Medicine

Jeffrey A. Singer

As Josh Bloom and I wrote last November, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) imposed onerous requirements on health care providers prescribing the effective drug clozapine to patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. 

Clozapine is an “atypical” antipsychotic drug. Atypical antipsychotic drugs have fewer movement-related side effects—like tardive dyskinesia, tremors, and stiffness—than “typical” psychotic drugs. The FDA approved clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in 1990, and in 2002, the agency announced that clozapine reduced the incidence of suicide in people with schizophrenia and other mental illnesses. A 2024 study by Brazilian researchers found that people prescribed atypical antipsychotics other than clozapine had a 21 percent greater chance of death than those prescribed clozapine. The World Health Organization includes clozapine on its List of Essential Medicines.

Up to 20 percent of homeless people have schizophrenia, and clozapine might help them turn their lives around. Unfortunately, the FDA has required clinicians, pharmacists, and patients to comply with onerous, one-size-fits-all rules. These rules help explain why, with an estimated 30 percent of schizophrenic patients not responding to first-line antipsychotic drugs, clozapine is only prescribed to 4 percent of schizophrenic patients in the US.

The reason behind the FDA prescribing restrictions has to do with a clozapine side-effect occurring in less than three percent of patients: agranulocytosis, a reversible but life-threatening drop in the white blood cell count. The risk of agranulocytosis drops sharply within months of beginning treatment. Research shows that, within a year, the risk of blood abnormalities caused by clozapine is similar to that of other antipsychotic drugs for which the FDA does not impose onerous prescribing regulations.

When the FDA approved clozapine, it required prescribers to conduct weekly blood tests to screen for agranulocytosis. In 2007, the FDA established the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program to ensure safety measures for drugs with specific side effects. In 2015, the FDA included clozapine in the REMS program. The Clozapine REMS program mandates that patients undergo routine lab tests, which prescribers and pharmacies must review before approving a limited seven-day supply. These stringent requirements, challenging even for healthy individuals, have made doctors hesitant to prescribe, pharmacies reluctant to dispense, and patients less likely to obtain clozapine.

The REMS program is a rigid, cookie-cutter system that prevents physicians from using their clinical judgment in collaboration with patients’ informed consent. Government-mandated REMS programs are unnecessary. Once the FDA approves a drug, manufacturers already track it for unforeseen long-term risks, driven by both regulatory requirements and concerns over reputation and liability. Likewise, doctors routinely monitor patients when prescribing medications with potentially serious side effects—failing to do so would be malpractice.

Statins, though commonly prescribed, can occasionally cause liver issues. Physicians typically check for this, especially in new patients, and adjust monitoring as needed. Many other medications, including antipsychotics like Seroquel, also carry risks of severe blood abnormalities. Yet, unlike clozapine, Seroquel is not subject to a rigid, bureaucratic oversight program that complicates access to treatment.

The FDA’s REMS program exemplifies government overreach, restricting adults’ autonomy and right to self-medicate—a topic I explore in my forthcoming book, Your Body, Your Health Care.

Angry Moms, an activist group representing caregivers to patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, has been calling on the FDA to remove the Clozapine REMS for years.

Finally, on February 24, 2025, the FDA announced:

Beginning today, FDA does not expect prescribers, pharmacies, and patients to participate in the risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) program for clozapine or to report results of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) blood tests before pharmacies dispense clozapine. FDA still recommends that prescribers monitor patients’ ANC according to the monitoring frequencies described in the prescribing information. Information about severe neutropenia will remain in the prescribing information for all clozapine medicines, including in the existing Boxed Warnings. 

Although the risk of severe neutropenia with clozapine still exists, FDA has determined that the REMS program for clozapine is no longer necessary to ensure the benefits of the medicine outweigh that risk. Eliminating the REMS is expected to decrease the burden on the health care delivery system and improve access to clozapine. FDA has notified the manufacturers that the clozapine REMS must be eliminated. FDA has instructed the clozapine manufacturers to formally submit a modification to eliminate the Clozapine REMS and to update the prescribing information, including removing mandatory reporting of ANC blood tests to the REMS program. 

In the coming months, FDA will work with the clozapine manufacturers to update the prescribing information and eliminate the Clozapine REMS.

This decision should make it easier for clinicians to treat their patients with a drug with a 35-year track record of effectiveness. Hopefully, many more patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia will now get help.

Next, the FDA should eliminate the REMS program altogether and allow patients to make their own health care choices in consultation with their chosen clinicians.

Register here to attend a Cato book forum for Your Body, Your Health Care, online or in person, on April 10.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
US continues to share data to protect Ukrainians against Russian strikes, despite intel pause: sources
next post
Friday Feature: Education Collaboration Network

You may also like

Will Incumbents Block Innovations in Veterinary Health Care...

July 29, 2024

Spending Cuts for 2025

November 19, 2024

Friday Feature: Log Cabin Schoolhouse

June 7, 2024

Congress Should Embrace the Cuts in Trump’s Skinny...

May 2, 2025

Trade in Real Life: Sorry Charlie (and Senator...

June 12, 2023

Tax Policy: Missing in Action

August 24, 2023

Pharmaceutical Pricing Around the World

May 14, 2025

Interstate Migration of High Earners and Retirees

July 30, 2024

Moving Fast, Breaking Things, and the Oath of...

February 5, 2025

Weak Income Tax Collections Pose Challenges for Some...

August 7, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump talks with Putin, spars with South African leader, threatens EU tariff hike in 18th week in office

      May 24, 2025
    • 4 Best Assignment Writing Services Reviewed by University Students

      May 24, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Tax-free overtime could be midterm magic for GOP

      May 24, 2025
    • SCOOP: House Republicans request ban on federally funded ‘transgender animal’ experiments in 2026 budget

      May 24, 2025
    • WATCH: GOP senators rail against staggering $4.7 trillion in untraceable Treasury payments

      May 24, 2025
    • Trump unleashes US nuclear renaissance with bold executive orders

      May 24, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,038)
    • Investing (1,986)
    • Politics (15,367)
    • Stocks (3,106)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved