Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Days from partial government shutdown deadline, here’s where things stand

by March 10, 2025
March 10, 2025

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is gearing up for a vote on Tuesday on a bill, which, if approved, will avert a partial government shutdown during the first 100 days of President Donald Trump’s term.

Given the lack of support from Democrats, Johnson is betting Republicans can muscle through largely by themselves on  the 99-page piece of legislation that would keep federal agencies funded until Sept. 30. 

Congress must act to avoid a partial government shutdown by Friday, March 14. Despite dozens of conservative defections on continuing resolutions over the past two years, Trump on Saturday called for Republicans to unite to support the bill. 

‘The House and Senate have put together, under the circumstances, a very good funding Bill (‘CR’)! All Republicans should vote (Please!) YES next week,’ Trump wrote on TRUTHSocial. ‘Great things are coming for America, and I am asking you all to give us a few months to get us through to September so we can continue to put the Country’s ‘financial house’ in order. Democrats will do anything they can to shut down our Government, and we can’t let that happen.’ 

‘We have to remain UNITED — NO DISSENT — Fight for another day when the timing is right,’ Trump added. ‘VERY IMPORTANT. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!’ 

Still, some Republicans have already signaled they would not support the CR. 

‘I’m not voting for the Continuing Resolution budget (cut-copy-paste omnibus) this week,’ Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., posted to X on Sunday. ‘Why would I vote to continue the waste fraud and abuse DOGE has found? We were told the CR in December would get us to March when we would fight. Here we are in March, punting again! WTFO.’ 

Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., meanwhile, said he has never voted for a continuing resolution, but he is on board with Johnson’s effort. He says he has confidence in Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Elon Musk, to make a difference on the nation’s debt. ‘I don’t like CRs,’ Norman said. ‘But what’s the alternative? Negotiate with Democrats? No.’

In a call with reporters on Saturday, House Republican leadership aides outlined how the bill provides for $892.5 billion in discretionary federal defense spending, and $708 billion in non-defense discretionary spending.

The aides emphasized that the bill was ‘closely coordinated’ with the White House – while stopping short of saying Trump backed the measure completely, noting he has not reviewed the specific pages yet.

It includes an additional $8 billion in defense dollars in an apparent bid to ease national security hawks’ concerns, while non-defense spending that Congress annually appropriates would decrease by about $13 billion.

There is  also an added $6 billion for healthcare for veterans.

The White House has requested additional spending in areas that were not present in the last government funding extension, known as ‘anomalies.’ Among the anomalies requested by Trump and being fulfilled by the bill is added funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Aides said the funding is meant to meet ‘an operations shortfall that goes back to the Biden administration.’

‘That money, most of that, has already been obligated prior to the start of this administration. So that request reflects an existing hole,’ a source said.

The bill also ensures that spending caps placed under a prior bipartisan agreement, the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA), are followed. The FRA mandated no more than a 1% federal spending increase in FY 2025. 

Cuts to non-defense discretionary spending would be found by eliminating some ‘side deals’ made during FRA negotiations, House GOP leadership aides said. Lawmakers would also not be given an opportunity to request funding for special pet projects in their districts known as earmarks, another area that Republicans are classifying as savings.

The bill does not cover the majority of government spending, including Social Security and Medicare. Funding for those two programs is on autopilot and not regularly reviewed by Congress. Still, Democratic leadership issued a statement Saturday saying they were troubled the bill does not take steps to protect those programs and Medicaid, which Republicans are eying to help pay for extending tax cuts passed in Trump’s first term.

‘We are voting no,’ a trio of House Democratic leaders, including House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said. 

The top Democrats on the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro and Washington Sen. Patty Murray, both issued statements blasting the legislation.

Murray said the legislation would ‘give Donald Trump and Elon Musk more power over federal spending — and more power to pick winners and losers, which threatens families in blue and red states alike.’ DeLauro, in an X post, called the CR ‘a power grab for the White House.’

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who heads the Senate Appropriations Committee, said the focus must be on preventing a shutdown because closures have negative consequences all across government.

‘They require certain essential government employees, such as Border Patrol agents, members of our military and Coast Guard, TSA screeners, and air traffic controllers, to report to work with no certainty on when they will receive their next paycheck,’ Collins said. ‘We cannot allow that to occur.’

Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
The Drug War Is Failing, So Let’s Try… Tariffs?
next post
Lithuanian defense minister: Only way to negotiate with Russia is with a ‘gun on the table’

You may also like

Iowa lawmakers meet for special session focused exclusively...

July 11, 2023

Battleground Democrats leave Biden high and dry after...

June 29, 2024

Failed VP candidate Tim Walz skewered after hinting...

March 4, 2025

Skyrocketing antisemitism in Canada sparks concern for country’s...

April 20, 2025

Biden, Harris advisers irked by Newsom’s plan to...

August 28, 2023

ATTENTION ALL PATRIOTS: January 6th Solidarity Truth Rally...

September 20, 2022

Gaetz and Rogers weren’t the first: Here are...

January 8, 2023

Court lets Texas keep floating border buoys in...

September 8, 2023

Ex-Obama official predicts Harris will seek new Iran...

August 27, 2024

Top Dems planning meeting about Biden’s future despite...

July 6, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s tax hike proposal is ‘déjà vu’ of George H. W. Bush’s ‘read my lips’ moment, experts say

      May 9, 2025
    • Pope Francis-era deal with Chinese Communist Party again under scrutiny as Pope Leo takes the reins

      May 9, 2025
    • Friday Feature: MCP Academy

      May 9, 2025
    • Vance says India-Pakistan conflict ‘none of our business’ as Trump offers US help

      May 9, 2025
    • Trump pushes tax hikes for wealthy as ‘big, beautiful bill’ deadline looms

      May 9, 2025
    • Luna Introduces PATRIOT Act Repeal Bill

      May 9, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (7,932)
    • Investing (1,945)
    • Politics (15,160)
    • Stocks (3,067)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved