Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

A US Sovereign Wealth Fund and Tariffs

by March 12, 2025
March 12, 2025
A US Sovereign Wealth Fund and Tariffs

Tad DeHaven

As the economic damage from the president’s tariff fanaticism continues, the Trump administration is reportedly considering using tariff revenue to finance a planned US Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF). The federal government having an investment fund is a bad idea, and financing it with tax increases on American businesses and consumers would add insult to injury. Moreover, tariff revenue can’t remotely pay for everything the administration claims it can. 

A US SWF makes no fiscal or economic sense (see here and here for more).

Beyond that, an SWF raises political concerns. Government-controlled investments would invite corruption, cronyism, and political interference. It could become a slush fund, vulnerable to manipulation by the current and future administrations. Trump’s record of bullying businesses is well established, and Democrats could later use it to push a progressive agenda.

Taxing American businesses and consumers via tariffs to fund an SWF would transfer resources and returns from the private sector to the government. That’s bad enough, but the administration suffers from the delusion that tariffs are a magic bullet capable of achieving multiple ends. 

Speaking at a recent event, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent brought up the administration’s three-legged tariff stool:

One, [tariffs are] a good source of revenues. Two, it protects our important industries and their employees. And three, [Trump has] added a third leg to the stool and uses it for negotiating.

How can tariffs be a good source of revenue if they’re a negotiating tool? One day, Trump says tariffs are being imposed. The next day, he says they’re not. The day after that, he says some are, and some aren’t. Unpredictability begets revenue instability—not to mention economic instability.

Similarly, how can tariffs be a good source of revenue if the goal is also to protect domestic industries? US industries will receive protection if tariffs drive up the price of goods from foreign competitors, causing Americans to switch to domestic producers. But, in that event, the reduction in imports would reduce the government’s tariff revenues. 

This is, as Scott Lincicome and Adam Michel explain in more depth, “economic schizophrenia.”

Tariffs are regressive; thus, mass tariff hikes would hit lower-income families the hardest. Bessent claims price increases would be mitigated by using tariff revenues to pay for income tax cuts benefitting the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett likewise claims that “everybody can be better off” by replacing income tax revenue with tariff revenue. 

The best that can be said here is that the administration is at least admitting tariffs will result in higher prices for Americans. Otherwise, the notion that tariff revenue can replace income tax revenue is a fantasy. (For a detailed evisceration, see here.) The bottom line is that even if the math did add up (it doesn’t), the consequences would make the past three weeks look like an economic boom. 

Only in an alternate reality can tariffs fund a sovereign wealth fund, replace income tax revenue, reduce the federal debt, lower the price of groceries, combat inflation, etc. In the real world, the Trump administration’s confused, incoherent approach to economic policy is proving to be the equivalent of shooting oneself in the foot.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Cato FOIA Win: Justice Department Inspector General Releases Data on HEMISPHERE Surveillance Program
next post
Utah’s Fluoride Ban: A Win for Medical Autonomy

You may also like

Reforming the 1974 Budget Act’s Definition of Tax...

July 27, 2023

Why the Chevron Victory Won’t End the Administrative...

July 18, 2024

Efficient, Timely and Reliable: A Framework for Election...

March 5, 2024

Obama, Biden Have Mislead More Health Insurance Purchasers...

July 31, 2023

Friday Feature: Kind Academy

July 7, 2023

Biden White House: FISA Good, Warrants Bad

February 15, 2024

Making Medicine Cost More Won’t Make America Healthy...

April 14, 2025

The Government Can’t Revoke a Visa Because of...

April 30, 2025

The New Deal and Recovery, Part 20, Appendix:...

August 11, 2022

Congress Might Make Election Law an Early Priority

January 10, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved