Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

New Essay: Public Health as If People Mattered

by March 18, 2025
March 18, 2025
New Essay: Public Health as If People Mattered

Michael F. Cannon

Five years ago this month, the world shut down due to COVID-19. “Paris, Milan, London, New York, San Francisco, and even Delhi—even India, the entire country—locked down in the most dramatic deprivation of freedom, which we couldn’t have even imagined.” Government responses dramatically reduced the threat of COVID-19 but also eroded trust in public health officials. An ongoing measles outbreak in Texas and surrounding states and the threat of H5 bird flu are again raising the question of what steps the government may legitimately take to stop the spread of contagious diseases.

In a new essay, I offer a framework for answering that question: government public health interventions are legitimate only to the extent they minimize the amount of violence in society.

Nonconsensual transmission of dangerous pathogens is an inherently violent act. A virus or bacterium can be as deadly as a bullet or a blade. Government exists to prevent and to provide remedies to violence. Government may therefore intervene in public health for the same reasons it may justly act in other areas.

But only up to a point. Government public health efforts themselves introduce violence. Government achieves its ends through coercion—i.e., threats and the use of physical violence. Some public health measures are themselves coercive. Even taxes that fund otherwise noncoercive public health measures involve coercion. Government may legitimately intervene only if a given public health intervention would minimize the net amount of violence in society.

This approach allows significant scope for government public health activities. The successful campaign to eradicate smallpox passes the violence-minimization test with flying colors. New York State’s imprisonment of alleged typhoid spreader Mary Mallon does not. Some actions that governments took during COVID-19, notably subsidizing vaccines, pass the test. Many others, like slamming young men to the sidewalk for not masking, do not. Some interventions that initially passed the test failed it when effective vaccines became available. 

Violence minimization is a more egalitarian and welfare-enhancing goal for public health officials than maximizing economic efficiency or even saving lives. It can also improve government public health efforts. To the extent government public health activities disregard autonomy, they can engender distrust and even resistance among civilians who see their own government as denying their equality by robbing them of autonomy. Prioritizing saving lives over autonomy can thus cause—and has caused—government public health efforts to backfire.

The essay, “Public Health as If People Mattered,” appears in the current issue of Social Philosophy & Policy (Cambridge University Press).

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Answering Frequently Asked Questions about the Inflation Reduction Act’s Energy Subsidies
next post
Land-Use Regulations Make Housing Less Affordable

You may also like

New Poll: Only 16% of Americans Support the...

May 31, 2023

Yard-Sign Libertarianism and Kamalamania

August 20, 2024

DOGE Recommendations: Emergency Spending

December 17, 2024

The US Tax and Transfer System Has Become...

March 7, 2025

The State of President Joe Biden’s Inflation Analysis

March 5, 2024

New IRS Estimate of the Tax Gap

October 13, 2023

Congress Should Fix the Nanny Tax

January 18, 2024

Did Anyone Ask Farmers About Revoking PNTR?

March 8, 2024

The State of Student Loan Forgiveness: July 2024

July 1, 2024

Getting Taiwan’s Self-Defense Right, Right Now

November 14, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Three Stocks in Focus: One Old Favorite, One Mag Name, and a Dow Comeback Story

      July 18, 2025
    • Don’t Hate the Player, Hate the Income Tax for Wrecking Health Care

      July 18, 2025
    • State Department says 59,000 tons of food assistance are in motion after reports of incinerated aid

      July 18, 2025
    • Pentagon to probe Microsoft’s use of Chinese engineers on sensitive defense systems, Hegseth says

      July 18, 2025
    • GOP senator reveals the ‘dirty’ secret to Trump’s Make America Healthy Again movement

      July 18, 2025
    • Russia says NATO threatens WWIII in latest deterrence plan that could take down Kaliningrad ‘faster than ever’

      July 18, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,524)
    • Investing (2,134)
    • Politics (16,112)
    • Stocks (3,218)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved