Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

School Choice Madness: How I Picked My Teams

by March 21, 2025
March 21, 2025
School Choice Madness: How I Picked My Teams

Colleen Hroncich

Try as I might, I’ve never been able to get into March Madness. The closest I came was when I had a March baby in 2006, and there wasn’t much else to watch on the hospital TV. So when a Cato colleague invited everyone to fill in a bracket—with only bragging rights on the line, no money—I had to figure out a way to pick my teams. No one in my family was surprised that I picked based on the school choice policies in each team’s state.

The school choice approach is a little tricky since more than 30 states have school choice—meaning it’s often a head-to-head matchup of two states with school choice programs. I try to use the reach of a program as my tiebreaker, although sometimes I have to just make a selection based on other considerations.

The school choice approach means I’ve had to pick some long shots at different levels. No. 3 seed Kentucky was knocked out in my first round since there are no school choice programs in the state, whereas its opponent, Troy University, is in Alabama—home to the CHOOSE Act education savings account. Similarly, I picked No. 15 Omaha over No. 2 St. John’s since Nebraska has a voucher while New York has no private school choice. (As an aside, it’s oddly hard to figure out where some schools are located when the name doesn’t include the city or state. It would be helpful if the brackets included that information.)

While Texas currently doesn’t have any school choice programs, I gave Texas teams the benefit of the doubt in my selections and advanced them as if one of the universal plans currently being debated in the legislature has been passed. But that can only go so far. I advanced Texas A&M over Yale and Michigan in the early rounds. But in the Sweet 16, I went with No. 16 Alabama St. over No. 4 Texas A&M since Alabama’s program has already been passed.

Without me even trying, my championship matchup was Florida vs. Arizona, which lines up with the current school choice champions. As anyone who ranks school choice programs can attest, which state lands on top depends on which factors you consider. My tiebreaker for this one was having a friend who’s a proud Florida Gator and works at Step Up for Students, the main scholarship organization in Florida.

Last year was my first time using the school choice approach to a sports bracket, and I can’t say it was very successful. But with more states creating and expanding programs, my basis for selecting teams has also expanded. Perhaps this will give me a better chance this year. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Top 5 Reasons to End the US Department of Education
next post
The Islamic Moses in the Times of Israel

You may also like

The FTC Event that Wasn’t: The Attention Economy...

June 3, 2025

Debunking Protectionist Claims About Tariffs and Industrial Expansion

May 22, 2025

How the Organized Bar Banned Competition from Auto...

April 5, 2024

New Defending Globalization Content: US Trade Agreements and...

August 27, 2024

Cato Report for the Department of Government Efficiency...

December 11, 2024

When Does Speech Threaten Officials? From Washington, a...

February 21, 2025

Dear Biden Administration: Please Do Not Take Health...

September 19, 2023

Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics: A Misleading Study...

January 2, 2024

Bipartisan Bill Seeks to Safeguard Americans from the...

December 12, 2024

Six Ways to Understand DOGE and Predict Its...

March 17, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Rescissions: A Small but Welcome Step Toward Spending Discipline

      June 5, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Why Navy ships should not be named for gay rights icons

      June 5, 2025
    • GREGG JARRETT: Biden, the ‘marionette president; and the case of the runaway autopen

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump Practically Bans Travel and Immigration from 12 Countries with Flimsy Security Justifications

      June 5, 2025
    • ‘He’s not a big factor’: Trump’s Senate allies dismiss Elon Musk’s calls to ‘kill the bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Fears grow that Tata Steel could be excluded from Starmer-Trump trade deal

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,523)
    • Stocks (3,127)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved