Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Top 5 Reasons to End the US Department of Education

by March 21, 2025
March 21, 2025
Top 5 Reasons to End the US Department of Education

Neal McCluskey

The US Department of Education is in the Trump administration’s crosshairs. Here are five major reasons it should be:

It’s unconstitutional: Education is nowhere among the specific, enumerated powers given to the federal government. That means the feds have no authority to govern in education. Even the big-government administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew that. In 1943, the US Constitution Sesquicentennial Commission, which Roosevelt chaired, published a document that included the following: “Q. Where, in the Constitution, is there mention of education? A. There is none; education is a matter reserved for the states.”
It’s ineffective: As indicated by the chart below, in K–12 education there is no meaningful evidence that the department, or federal spending generally, has improved education outcomes. While federal spending has risen, National Assessment of Educational Progress outcomes have largely stagnated. Of course, standardized test scores might not be a great barometer of how well the education system is working, but it is the feds that elevated them under the No Child Left Behind Act, Race to the Top, and Common Core. So by Washington’s own measure, it has not been very effective.

3. It’s incompetent: US ED’s biggest job is to administer federal student aid programs, especially student loans. But as the Government Accountability Office recently reported, US ED has failed at basic functions like tracking repayments for years. Heck, it could not even simplify the form to apply for aid without creating havoc.

4. It’s unnecessary: We had been educating kids for centuries before the department launched in 1980 and leading the world economically, technologically, and more. And US ED’s own mission statement is full of words such as “promote” and “supplement,” not “control” or “run.” Because states, districts, families, and educators are responsible for education, not Washington.

5. It’s expensive: Until recently, the department employed nearly 4,200 people and cost about $2.8 billion for salaries and expenses. And that’s setting aside all of the money it distributes and programs it runs, which are not about the department itself but tally hundreds of billions of dollars a year, depending on how you account for the huge, murky, unconstitutional student loan programs.

An unconstitutional, ineffective, incompetent, unnecessary, and expensive federal department is not a benefit to the country. It’s a mistake that must go away.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
How Much Does It Cost to Build a Mobile Application in 2025?
next post
School Choice Madness: How I Picked My Teams

You may also like

Democracies, Autocracies, and Same‐​Sex Unions

May 3, 2023

Social Security Benefits Are Growing Too Fast

September 21, 2023

A Pro-Expression and Innovation Agenda for the New...

December 3, 2024

Increased Medicaid Coverage Is Not Improving Low Birth...

June 13, 2023

The Senate Plan Is a Trap—House Lawmakers Shouldn’t...

April 8, 2025

One Year of Javier Milei

December 11, 2024

How Large Is the Federal Debt?

October 10, 2023

One Year of Sounding the Debt Alarm at...

August 17, 2023

The Untouchables: How Prosecutorial Immunity Breeds Injustice

March 11, 2025

Efficient, Timely and Reliable: A Framework for Election...

March 5, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • White House pushes back forcefully on Epstein file criticism: ‘Asinine suggestion’

      July 17, 2025
    • ‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for more partisan spending process

      July 17, 2025
    • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ

      July 17, 2025
    • Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between judges, climate activists, raising ethical concerns

      July 17, 2025
    • Not ‘honest’ news organizations: White House defends yanking $9B ‘worth of crap’ in rescissions package

      July 17, 2025
    • Cato’s David Bier Testifies Before House Hearing on Immigration Parole and Deportation

      July 17, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,510)
    • Investing (2,128)
    • Politics (16,097)
    • Stocks (3,217)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved