Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Does Higher Education Need “Saving”?

by March 22, 2025
March 22, 2025
Does Higher Education Need “Saving”?

Erec Smith

Since my first immersion into academia in graduate school, I’ve noticed a systemic “fight the power” attitude in the humanities, especially English studies, which includes my field of rhetoric and composition. The unquestioned assumption was that the world needed saving, and we were the ones to do it.

What makes this different from the typical heroism and elitism of intellectuals—especially youthful intellectuals—is that English studies sought to save the world from itself by at least mitigating the effects of Western civilization and its concomitant capitalistic framework. No one ever came close to asking, “Is Western Civilization so bad?” or “Why is Western Civilization such a salient target of academic criticism?” Its detriments were assumed and often unarticulated.

However, in some places, we may be moving beyond those questions and starting to settle on the idea that Western civilization is not simply worth salvaging but worth celebrating. Higher education should focus on that celebration by helping students understand and navigate Western Civilization successfully.

This means taking a machete to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and slashing federal funding and student aid that does more harm than good. However, legislators like those in Utah are taking a more targeted approach by trying to prescribe a general higher education focused on the intellectual building blocks of Western Civilization, including the rise and influence of Christianity. Utah State legislators tacitly frame this bill as a rescue mission for higher education, saving it from the illiberal grip of anti-Western sentiment. But is it really an improvement?

Utah’s Republican Sen. John Johnson seems to think so. His bill, SB334, establishes a new Center for Civic Excellence at Utah State University. This center will be responsible for hiring and training faculty to teach in the school’s general education program, which Harrison Kleiner, the school’s vice provost for general education, says is currently fragmented, incoherent, and “broken.” According to Johnson, the Center for Civil Excellence will be charged with “engaging students in civil and rigorous intellectual inquiry, across ideological differences, with a commitment to intellectual freedom in the pursuit of truth.”

With that in mind, SB334 will mandate the following: six credits in written and oral communication combined with three humanities credits; three three-credit humanities courses focusing on foundational texts predominantly from Western Civilization, covering intellectual contributions from ancient Israel, Greece, Rome, the rise of Christianity, medieval Europe, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, and post-Enlightenment periods; and one three-credit course in American institutions that explores the development of the United States’ republican form of government, emphasizing founding principles such as natural rights, liberty, equality, constitutional self-government, and market systems.

Proponents of the bill say it will better ensure that students are prepared for successful participation in Western society. I agree, adding that the taint of illiberalism seemingly systemic in American higher education will be mitigated substantially by a civic and more pragmatic curriculum. That said, some opponents of the bill argue that there is potential for government overreach, an infringement of First Amendment rights, and the wresting of university governance from the faculty, the group that should be running colleges and universities.

Shane Graham, a professor in USU’s English department, says the bill “feels like an attack on our expertise and our academic freedom.” As I see it, the latter target of this attack, academic freedom, should be taken seriously. However, based on national trends in the humanities, the attack on “expertise” is understandable.

Let’s take my field of rhetoric and composition. Like in other humanistic disciplines, in rhetoric and composition, Anti-Western sentiment is not an aberration; it is the norm. Anti-capitalist writing pedagogy—which is as nonsensical as it sounds—along with a brazen embrace of Marxist notions are just some of the anti-American stances. But if the job of a faculty is to prepare students for a successful and fulfilling life in American society, having professors who openly hate American society is inherently contradictory. What could possibly go wrong?

Regarding the attack on academic freedom, I understand Graham’s concern. This bill aligns with the anti-DEI legislation put forth by the Trump administration. Still, like that legislation, the bill ironically sounds like an infringement on academic freedom and free expression. With DEI, the problem was never discussion about Critical Race Theory or Critical Gender Studies; it was the compelling of students and faculty to embrace such ideologies as truth and the moral high ground. Yet, the legislation’s lack of specificity and clarity opens the door for all discussion of things related to race and sexual orientation, which would be a disservice to all students’ ability to acquire a well-rounded education in Western Civilization.

For example, any discussion of American history without a sufficient treatment of race relations would be like trying to understand European history without mentioning religious contention. SB 334 is similar, potentially throwing out the baby with the bathwater by jettisoning free speech and free inquiry about certain topics. Although the bill cites Lao Tzu and Chinua Achebe—authors considered marginal to the traditional Western Canon—as ideal texts, more non-Western authors and themes should also be included.

Ultimately, I do not like government intervention in spaces traditionally run by non-government actors. However, as a former academic and target of illiberal intolerance, higher education reform is needed direly. If other states follow suit, I hope, at the very least, that they do so in a way that promotes a classically liberal education while exposing students to some non-Western ideas as well.

After all, education should teach students how to think, not what to think. I would like to see the illiberal sentiment I’ve experienced in academia defanged, but not at the expense of a truly holistic education.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Law Firm Paul, Weiss Capitulates
next post
The Long-Term Reputational Costs of Trumpian Protectionism

You may also like

Is Driving in California Subsidized?

July 16, 2024

Let’s Fix the Quorum Quandary at FERC

February 15, 2024

Considering Safe Banking for the Cannabis Industry

May 23, 2024

Universal School Choice in Arizona: Not a Giveaway...

August 8, 2024

Pushed Out and Underserved? Examining Alternative Education Campuses

November 9, 2023

That’s Not How the BRAC Commission Worked: No...

November 28, 2023

Biden‐​McCarthy Deal a Modest Start

May 31, 2023

New Oversight Board Decision Raises New Opportunities, and...

March 25, 2024

How the World Trade Organization Can Get Its...

May 30, 2023

DC Purple Line Cost Overruns and Delays Continue

March 11, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • HMRC inheritance tax investigations surge 37% as treasury seeks to plug revenue gap

      June 9, 2025
    • Believ secures £300m to roll out 30,000 public EV charge points across the UK

      June 9, 2025
    • US and China hold London talks to ease trade war tensions

      June 9, 2025
    • British fathers urged to join landmark ‘dad strike’ over poor paternity leave

      June 9, 2025
    • IVF parents should have right to paid fertility leave, says GMB union

      June 9, 2025
    • Reform UK clashes with Bank of England over interest payments to lenders

      June 9, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,158)
    • Investing (2,019)
    • Politics (15,571)
    • Stocks (3,136)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved