Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Presidents Can’t Overhaul Election Law by Decree

by March 26, 2025
March 26, 2025
Presidents Can’t Overhaul Election Law by Decree

Walter Olson

On March 25, President Donald Trump published an executive order purporting to overhaul the nation’s election system. Among its contents: requiring voters who use the federal registration form to furnish documentary proof of citizenship, preparing the way for decertifying commonly used voting equipment, and nullifying state laws that accept as valid some military and other mailed ballots that arrive after Election Day. It directs the Department of Homeland Security, in tandem with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), to use subpoenas if necessary to gain access to state voter registration lists and list maintenance methods and scrutinize each “for consistency with Federal requirements.” States would also be told to hand over what information they had about election law violations to the feds for use by the latter. Funding cutoffs are contemplated for states that don’t cooperate. 

We’ll see what the Constitution and the courts have to say about this. 

Under our American system, voting and voter registration are predominantly responsibilities of the states, with Congress constitutionally empowered to add some overlays through legislation of general applicability. A president cannot change those basics by putting out an executive order, nor may he commandeer the states, through funding blackmail or otherwise, into acting as instruments of his pleasure.

The so-called SAVE Act, which I wrote about last August, is a bill in Congress that would impose national standards of documentary proof of citizenship. While it has been a Republican priority, it’s widely agreed that the prospect of a Democratic filibuster makes it unlikely to pass Congress any time soon. It appears that Trump has decided he can achieve much of the same effect—together with that of other controversial measures with poor prospects in Congress—by simple decree. 

Of the various components of the order, there are some that I might agree would be good ideas if enacted by the appropriate authority, whether a state legislature or Congress, as the case may be. Others, not so much. But the substantive merits shouldn’t be at center stage here. 

New laws should be passed by lawmakers, not by decree, and across much of the order Trump is trying to usurp power not rightfully his. Moreover, the Supreme Court’s Spending Clause jurisprudence provides serious limits on Washington’s power to make states dance to its tune by attaching conditions to funding. Congress must have provided clear notice of the strings in question; the condition must be related to the underlying purpose of the spending (no cutting off grants for fighting street crime or wildfires to extract policy changes on, say, voter ID); the level of funding threat must not be serious enough to “coerce” the state; states and their agencies must not wind up “commandeered”; and so forth. Trump and his administration often act as if they had never heard of these constitutional constraints. 

The Framers took care to leave the administration of federal elections in state hands. There were no doubt several reasons why, but one was that they feared a strongman figure would try to seize general nationwide control over this vital power and subsequently keep himself and his followers in office. That’s one reason the federal government should be kept as much as possible at a distance from election administration and by no means allowed to insert itself deep into its workings by presidential decree. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Business reaction to Reeves’s spring statement: confidence remains fragile as costs rise and support lags
next post
Three Growth Stocks Testing the Ultimate Trend Barometer

You may also like

OECD’s Pillar One: A Step Towards Chaos Rather...

October 30, 2023

Commercial-to-Residential Zoning Reform Gains Steam

November 10, 2023

Libertarianism and Government Shutdowns

October 4, 2023

Assessing JD Vance: Votes Not Vibes

August 8, 2024

Only 45 Percent of Employment-Based Green Cards Went...

December 11, 2023

South Carolina School Choice Law Benefits the Public

February 13, 2024

Biden Proposal to Raise the Corporate Tax Rate

March 7, 2024

1.8 Million in Employment-Based Green Card Backlog

August 29, 2023

China’s Economic System Isn’t ‘Incompatible’ with WTO Rules

December 13, 2023

50th Anniversary of Hayek’s Nobel

October 9, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Blue state Republicans threaten rebellion if Senate changes key provision in Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Ricketts, Fetterman team up for crackdown on China’s attempts to purchase US farmland

      June 5, 2025
    • Hamas working to ‘sabotage’ Trump-backed aid group with ‘fake news’: Israeli official

      June 5, 2025
    • Longtime Trump loyalist flips on GOP’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      June 5, 2025
    • Supreme Court rules Wisconsin unconstitutionally discriminated against Christian charity

      June 5, 2025
    • Trump touts ‘very positive’ breakthrough with Xi after slamming China for trade violation

      June 5, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,147)
    • Investing (2,008)
    • Politics (15,529)
    • Stocks (3,128)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved