Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

If Student Loans Are Removed From the Department of Education, Where Should They Go?

by April 1, 2025
April 1, 2025
If Student Loans Are Removed From the Department of Education, Where Should They Go?

Andrew Gillen

As momentum for closing the US Department of Education gains steam, questions about the transition are starting to surface, with the biggest ones concerning student loans. While we have argued for the privatization of student loans (full report or blog summary), which would eliminate the need for a new home for student loans, most of the current discussion revolves around keeping the existing loan programs but moving them to another department or agency, with the Department of the Treasury and the Small Business Administration (SBA) being the most discussed new homes. Treasury is the better choice for three reasons.

First, just under 40 percent of students are repaying through an income-driven repayment (IDR) plan, which requires information on income, information that the Treasury already has but SBA does not. Under IDR plans, payments are a set percentage of income (typically 10 percent) each month. With monthly payments varying, the length of the loan varies too, with high earners repaying their loans more quickly. Since the Treasury already collects income information (through the Internal Revenue Service) needed for IDR, it is better positioned to manage IDR plans than the SBA.

Second, the Treasury already has systems set up and running to deal with troublesome loans. For example, the Treasury Offset Program is used to collect unpaid taxes and student loans from borrowers who default by garnishing their tax refunds and other government payments. The SBA would have to set up its own system or outsource the task to Treasury.

Third, SBA’s experience facilitating loans is irrelevant for student loans. One of the main things the SBA does is provide loan guarantees to private lenders, which means it has considerable experience evaluating the quality of loans (often called underwriting). But student loans do not go through underwriting as eligibility and loan terms are all set by Congress, which renders SBA’s greater experience in underwriting irrelevant. Relatedly, SBA’s experience with loan guarantees is likewise irrelevant, because student loans should not have loan guarantees.

Overall, if student loans are moved, the Department of the Treasury would be a better choice than the Small Business Administration. 

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump pick for Joint Chiefs chair tells Senate element of surprise ‘likely lost’ amid Signal chat leak
next post
AU Surges Above Resistance: Here’s How to Take Action

You may also like

Money Is Not a Public Good

December 8, 2023

A Small City’s Financial Crisis Leaves Virginia at...

July 24, 2023

A Good Start: Congress Cuts Funding for USAID...

July 31, 2025

The State of Student Loan Forgiveness: June 2024

June 3, 2024

EPA’s New Power Plant Emissions Rule Relies on...

May 22, 2024

Colorado Supreme Court Rules Trump Off Ballot

December 20, 2023

Governor Tim Walz’s Fiscal Record

August 9, 2024

More than Just a Tax Cut: the Case...

October 30, 2024

Defuse the Culture War with Liberated Education

June 29, 2023

Friday Feature: Refine KC

October 6, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • States Should Recognize Other States’ Physician Licenses

      August 13, 2025
    • House Democrat presses DOJ on Ghislaine Maxwell prison transfer, meeting with top official

      August 13, 2025
    • Vance to visit US troops during high-stakes UK trip ahead of Trump’s Putin meeting

      August 13, 2025
    • Ben Roper’s Rise in REITs: From Leasing to Leading Deals

      August 13, 2025
    • Reeves appoints senior business leaders to treasury board – but SME’s call for their own voice

      August 13, 2025
    • Former Navy SEAL Rep. Eli Crane fires off message for ex-President Obama: ‘Probably best to sit this one out’

      August 13, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,770)
    • Investing (2,202)
    • Politics (16,380)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved