Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Benjamin Anderson (1949): The Crowning Financial Folly of the Hawley-Smoot Tariff

by April 8, 2025
April 8, 2025
Benjamin Anderson (1949): The Crowning Financial Folly of the Hawley-Smoot Tariff

Alan Reynolds

(Photo: his​to​ry​on​thenet​.com)

Benjamin M. Anderson was a legendary Austrian economist at Chase National Bank from 1929 to 1939, then a UCLA economist until his death in 1949, the publication year of this remarkable insider’s analysis of US financial and economic history as it happened.

Benjamin M. Anderson, Economics and the Public Welfare: A Financial and Economic History of the United States, 1924–46 (2nd edition, Liberty Press, Indianapolis 1979, pp. 229–30):

“There came another folly of government intervention in 1930 transcending all the rest in its significance and in its baleful consequences. In a world staggering under a load of international debt, which could be carried only if countries under pressure could produce goods and export them to the creditors, we, the greatest creditor nation of the world, with tariffs already far too high, raised our tariffs again. The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act of June 1930 was the crowning financial folly of the whole period from 1920 to 1933…

“Once we raised our tariffs, an irresistible movement all over the world to raise tariffs and to erect other trade barriers, including quotas, began. Protectionism ran wild over the world. Markets were cut off. Trade lines were narrowed. Unemployment in the export industries all over the world grew with great rapidity, and the prices of export commodities, notably farm commodities in the United States, dropped with ominous rapidity. Farm prices in the United States dropped sharply through the whole of 1930, but the most rapid rate of decline came following the passage of the trade bill.

“The dangers of this measure were so well understood in financial circles that, up to the very last, the New York financial district retained hope that President Hoover would veto the tariff bill. But late on January 15, it was announced that he would sign the bill. This was headline news Monday morning. The stock market dropped 12 points in the New York Times averages that day, and the industrials broke nearly twenty points. The market, not the President, was right.”

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Your Body Is Not Government Property
next post
Trump-backed bill to rein in federal judges gets House-wide vote

You may also like

You Say You Want Fintech Competition, You Better...

November 26, 2024

Did the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Pay...

July 31, 2024

The End of Net Neutrality

January 7, 2025

Taiwan Arms Backlog, April 2024 Update

May 2, 2024

New Poll: Only 16% of Americans Support the...

May 31, 2023

The Political Economy of EPA’s Updated Social Cost...

February 28, 2024

On Transgender Athletes and the Federal Government

February 6, 2025

More Bank Lending Won’t Cure China’s Ills

January 31, 2024

Should Muslims Really Welcome Denmark’s Proposed Anti-Blasphemy Law?

August 29, 2023

Cato Scholars React to Supreme Court Student Loan...

June 30, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Here’s What’s Fueling the Moves in Bitcoin, Gaming, and Metals

      July 12, 2025
    • Inside longtime Biden aide’s marathon closed-door grilling in House GOP cover-up probe

      July 12, 2025
    • David Gergen, trusted White House advisor to 4 US presidents across decades, dies at 83

      July 11, 2025
    • 3 Stocks Seasoned Investors Should Watch

      July 11, 2025
    • What Happens Next for the S&P 500? Pick Your Path!

      July 11, 2025
    • The First Amendment Protects Ideologically Based Ad Boycotts

      July 11, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,454)
    • Investing (2,118)
    • Politics (16,011)
    • Stocks (3,205)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved