Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump’s “Liberation Day” Tariffs

by April 15, 2025
April 15, 2025
Lawsuit Filed Challenging Trump’s “Liberation Day” Tariffs

Ilya Somin

This commentary was originally published in The Volokh Conspiracy at Rea​son​.com. 

On April 14, the Liberty Justice Center and I filed a lawsuit in the US Court of International Trade challenging the legality of Donald Trump’s gargantuan “Liberation Day” tariffs, on behalf of five US businesses that import goods from many of the countries targeted by the tariffs. The case is entitled VOS Selections, Inc. v. Trump.

In previous posts, I previewed our key arguments and explained why Trump’s partial pause of the tariffs does not end the madness or obviate the need to challenge this usurpation of legislative power in court.

To briefly summarize, we argue that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) doesn’t authorize tariffs at all, that even if it does the bilateral trade deficits targeted by the “Liberation Day” tariffs do not qualify as an “emergency” or as an “unusual and extraordinary threat” (both prerequsites to invoking IEEPA), that Trump’s use of IEEPA for this purpose runs afoul of the “major questions” doctrine, and that—if these actions are authorized by IEEPA—it would violate constitutional limits on delegation of legislative power to the executive. If we prevail on any one of these points, we win the case.

The complaint is available here.

Here is an excerpt from the Liberty Justice Center press release announcing the case:

On April 14, the Liberty Justice Center filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s authority to unilaterally issue the “Liberation Day” tariffs, which are devastating small businesses across the country. The lawsuit argues that the Administration has no authority to issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs without congressional approval.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, highlights the unprecedented nature of the tariffs, including a global 10% tariff on nearly all imports, with additional higher tariffs targeting dozens of countries based on dubious calculations of foreign trade barriers.

The President invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the “Liberation Day” tariffs, as well as the tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China. But under that law, the President may invoke emergency economic powers only after declaring a national emergency in response to an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to national security, foreign policy, or the U.S. economy originating outside of the United States. The lawsuit argues that the Administration’s justification— a trade deficit in goods—is neither an emergency nor an unusual or extraordinary threat. Trade deficits have existed for decades, and do not constitute a national emergency or threat to security. Moreover, the Administration imposed tariffs even on countries with which the U.S. does not have a trade deficit, further undermining the administration’s justification.

And as the Complaint explains, IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose across-the-board tariffs—it does not even authorize tariffs at all; and even if the IEEPA did extend such power to the President, that would be an unconstitutional delegation of Congress’s power to impose tariffs.

“No one person should have the power to impose taxes that have such vast global economic consequences,” said Jeffrey Schwab, Senior Counsel at the Liberty Justice Center. “The Constitution gives the power to set tax rates—including tariffs—to Congress, not the President.”

“If starting the biggest trade war since the Great Depression based on a law that doesn’t even mention tariffs is not an unconstitutional usurpation of legislative power, I don’t know what is,” said Ilya Somin, co-counsel, law professor, Scalia Law School, George Mason University.

The case is filed on behalf of five owner-operated businesses who have been severely harmed by the tariffs and highlights the human and economic toll of unchecked executive power….

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Bill Maher’s Embrace of Civil Discourse Is No Laughing Matter
next post
Schumer calls on Leland Dudek, acting commissioner of SSA, to resign

You may also like

Arrest of Telegram CEO Yet Another Threat to...

August 27, 2024

Rand Paul’s Bill Taking a New Look at...

December 7, 2023

America’s Third Founding: May 24, 1924, the Immigration...

May 24, 2024

Governor DeSantis Tells Residents of the “Free State...

May 3, 2024

Trump Proposes to Socialize IVF

August 30, 2024

Cato Tax Bootcamp: Tax Code 101

January 14, 2025

Trump’s Energy Emergency Widens the Arc of the...

January 24, 2025

Update: DOJ Jumps the Shark

February 14, 2025

Congress Can’t Delegate Away Its Power to Define...

April 29, 2024

Courts Should Affirm First Amendment Rights of Youths...

April 1, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Netflix accused of copying show idea by ‘Queen of bling’ Celia Sawyer

      May 30, 2025
    • Reform UK becomes first British political party to accept Bitcoin donations, says Farage

      May 30, 2025
    • UK business confidence jumps to nine-month high as trade tensions ease

      May 30, 2025
    • Bailey urges Starmer to deepen EU ties to soften Brexit blow and counter Trump tariffs

      May 30, 2025
    • Royal family’s wine merchant to open first US store in Washington

      May 30, 2025
    • Starlink set to expand UK footprint as Ofcom greenlights new spectrum licences

      May 30, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,104)
    • Investing (1,996)
    • Politics (15,434)
    • Stocks (3,115)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved