Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Politics

Trump’s executive order on voting blocked by federal judge amid flurry of legal setbacks

by April 24, 2025
April 24, 2025
Trump’s executive order on voting blocked by federal judge amid flurry of legal setbacks

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Thursday blocked a portion of President Donald Trump’s executive order on election integrity, specifically provisions related to providing documentary proof of citizenship before being allowed to register to vote.

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia handed down the order in response to lawsuits filed by three separate groups of plaintiffs over five different provisions in a March 25 Trump executive order relating to election integrity. While Kollar-Kotelly dismissed requests to block three of the provisions, requests to block two other provisions pertaining to a proof of citizenship requirement for voters were granted. 

The first blocked provision sought to compel the Election Assistance Commission to amend standardized national voter registration forms to require documentary proof of citizenship. The second sought to require federal agencies offering voter registration to people on public assistance to ‘assess’ the individual’s citizenship status before doing so.

‘Our Constitution entrusts Congress and the States – not the President – with the authority to regulate federal elections. Consistent with that allocation of power, Congress is currently debating legislation that would effect many of the changes the President purports to order,’ Kollar-Kotelly, a Clinton-appointee, wrote in her order. ‘No statutory delegation of authority to the Executive Branch permits the President to short-circuit Congress’s deliberative process by executive order.’

Kollar-Kotelly said she would not block the other provisions that the groups sought to challenge, which cover mail-in ballots and data collection on citizenship status, calling the challenges ‘premature’ and indicating they would be best challenged at the state level.

Earlier this month, the Republican-led House of Representatives passed a bill requiring proof-of-citizenship to vote in federal elections. The measure still must pass the Senate, however, before the president can sign it into law. 

Meanwhile, 25 states are considering some form of proof-of-citizenship legislation, according to the Voting Rights Lab, which is tracking such legislation. In total, 15 state constitutions have explicit prohibitions against non-citizen voting.

In addition to Trump’s proof-of-citizenship orders getting shot down, two other federal judges from Maryland and New Hampshire also shot down additional orders from the president related to ending diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in K-12 public schools on Thursday.

The rulings followed lawsuits filed by the National Education Association, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Maryland chapter of the American Federation of Teachers. The groups argued that making federal funding contingent on whether educators squash their DEI programs violates First Amendment rights granted by the Constitution.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on this article but did not receive a response in time for publication. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
SCOOP: Inside progressives’ plan to have ‘thousands’ protest vulnerable Republican’s town hall
next post
WATCH: An American Small Business-Owner Explains Why President Trump’s China Tariffs Are Catastrophic . . . Even If Cut in Half

You may also like

Matt Gaetz, House Judiciary Subcommittee continue hearing today...

July 14, 2023

Trump Wins: “Sexual Assault” Accuser’s Defamation Case Thrown...

September 29, 2022

Pompeo slams White House after report about Iran’s...

July 31, 2024

Former Los Angeles City Council President Nury Martinez...

October 11, 2022

EXCLUSIVE: Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano’s Message to Catholic...

October 21, 2022

Schumer forces reading of Trump’s entire ‘big, beautiful...

June 29, 2025

Senate GOP blows through 2nd hurdle of the...

July 16, 2025

Wisconsin Representative Janel Brandtjen and Thomas More Society...

November 7, 2022

Rep Moulton says fellow Dems ‘privately’ agree with...

November 15, 2024

Dem Rep. Dingell admits she is ‘worried’ American...

April 24, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Debanking Order Calls for Investigation, Something Tennessee Should Have Done

      August 10, 2025
    • Summertime and the living is uneasy on Capitol Hill

      August 10, 2025
    • Putin ally warns ‘titanic efforts’ are underway to sink Trump summit over Ukraine war

      August 10, 2025
    • Farage faces rising tension with younger Reform voters over net zero stance

      August 10, 2025
    • The Role of Automation in Streamlining Customer Communication

      August 10, 2025
    • Trump media to stream GB news on Truth+ in global expansion deal

      August 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,742)
    • Investing (2,191)
    • Politics (16,354)
    • Stocks (3,228)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved