Future Retirement Success
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stocks

Future Retirement Success

Investing

Federal Judge: President Trump Can’t Unilaterally Rewrite Election Law

by April 25, 2025
April 25, 2025
Federal Judge: President Trump Can’t Unilaterally Rewrite Election Law

Stephen Richer

“Our Constitution entrusts Congress and the States—not the President—with the authority to regulate federal elections.” —Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, United States District Judge

On April 24, US District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly blocked the highest profile part of President Trump’s March 25 executive order on election administration. That part, Section 2(a), directed the United States Election Assistance Commission to change the federal voter registration to require documented proof of citizenship.

I’ve written before that I agree with the president’s aspiration to require documented proof of citizenship for all American voters. Currently, federal law only requires legal attestation of citizenship.

But, as Walter Olson wrote previously for this blog, “Of the various components of the order, there are some that I might agree would be good ideas .… But the substantive merits shouldn’t be at center stage here. New laws should be passed by lawmakers, not by decree.”

Judge Kollar-Kotelly agreed with Olson; the executive order is procedurally and legally deficient. The president does not have unilateral authority to shape election policy.

This should have been obvious to the president. After all, the Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act in 1993, and that major piece of federal election law specifically assessed proof of citizenship: “The Conference Committee on the bill that became the NVRA considered and rejected an amendment proposed … to require presentation of documentation relating to citizenship of an applicant for voter registration.”

More obviously, the US Senate is currently considering the much-discussed SAVE Act, which proposes to do the very thing the president wants—require proof of citizenship for voters. Congress wouldn’t go to the trouble of drafting, negotiating, and politicking the bill if it could simply be done by the president with one signature.

In addition to ignoring the Congress, President Trump’s Executive Order also forgets that states possess “the power to regulate the time, place, and manner” of elections. As summarized by Judge Kollar-Kotelly, “the States have initial authority to regulate elections. Congress has supervisory authority over those regulations. The President does not feature at all.”

There is wisdom to this diffusion of election authority. As one of the Constitution drafters, Theophilus Parsons, wrote, the distribution of election administration power guards against “the influence of ambitious or popular characters, or in times of popular commotion, and when faction and party spirit run high.”

This now resonates with many Democrats and liberal nonprofits. Though they spent much of the past four years trying to federalize election administration through the “For the People Act (HR 1),” they now embrace federalism and limitations on the executive. Welcome, I suppose, to the Cato Institute.

It remains to be seen if the president will appeal the injunctive order. Judge Kollar-Kotelly allowed other parts of the executive order to survive an injunctive pause and proceed down the civil litigation process.

This case encompassed lawsuits filed by various nonprofit groups, as well as national Democratic organizations. There are two other lawsuits challenging the legality of the president’s executive order—one filed in Massachusetts by Democratic attorneys general from 19 states and one by the states of Oregon and Washington.

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump’s goodwill tested as Putin ignores peace efforts during Witkoff’s visit
next post
S&P 500 Rises From Bearish to Neutral, But Will It Last?

You may also like

To Reduce Teen Marijuana Consumption, Legalize It for...

August 7, 2024

More Evidence Debunking Nurse Practitioners’ Critics

October 24, 2023

Ezra Klein’s Conversion to Libertarianism Proceeds Apace

December 26, 2024

Steve Ballmer’s New Public Sector 10‑K Report Illustrates...

April 20, 2023

Should States Run Lotteries?

November 22, 2024

New CBO Report on Growth and Tax Cuts...

December 10, 2024

Green Energy Subsidies Not So Green

December 3, 2024

The First Step Act Applies to Resentenced Defendants

May 6, 2024

Freedom to Offend Under Threat Across Europe

February 6, 2025

New Data Show Migrants Were More Likely to...

November 2, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Recent Posts

    • DAVID MARCUS: Why nobody wants to cut the national debt despite everyone saying they should

      May 28, 2025
    • Senate Republican campaign committee ‘grills’ Chuck Schumer on National Hamburger Day

      May 28, 2025
    • Trump confirms he told Netanyahu to back off Iran strikes amid nuclear talks

      May 28, 2025
    • Obama-nominated judge allows lawsuit targeting Musk’s role with DOGE to proceed, drops claims against Trump

      May 28, 2025
    • White House sending $9.4B DOGE cuts package to Congress next week

      May 28, 2025
    • Jeanine Pirro sworn in as interim US attorney, pledging ‘no more mercy for criminals’

      May 28, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (8,082)
    • Investing (1,992)
    • Politics (15,400)
    • Stocks (3,113)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: futureretirementsuccess.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 futureretirementsuccess.com | All Rights Reserved